IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jomstd/v42y2005i4p705-735.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Management, Theology and Moral Points of View: Towards an Alternative to the Conventional Materialist‐Individualist Ideal‐Type of Management

Author

Listed:
  • Bruno Dyck
  • David Schroeder

Abstract

abstract Weber's (1958) argument suggests that there are four ideal‐types of management, and that conventional management is underpinned by a moral‐point‐of‐view associated with a secularized Protestant Ethic, which can be characterized by its relatively high emphasis on materialism (e.g. productivity, efficiency and profitability) and individualism (e.g. competitiveness). Weber calls on management scholars and practitioners to become aware of their own moral‐points‐of‐view, and to develop management theory and practice that de‐emphasizes materialism and individualism. Our paper responds to this challenge, as we draw from an Anabaptist‐Mennonite moral‐point‐of‐view to develop a radical ideal‐type of management that is characterized by its emphasis on servant leadership, stakeholding, job crafting and sustaincentrism. Implications for management theory and practice are discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Bruno Dyck & David Schroeder, 2005. "Management, Theology and Moral Points of View: Towards an Alternative to the Conventional Materialist‐Individualist Ideal‐Type of Management," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 42(4), pages 705-735, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:jomstd:v:42:y:2005:i:4:p:705-735
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2005.00516.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2005.00516.x
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2005.00516.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. L. Metcalf & S. Benn, 2012. "The Corporation is Ailing Social Technology: Creating a ‘Fit for Purpose’ Design for Sustainability," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 111(2), pages 195-210, December.
    2. Alvaro Plinio Pureza & Ki‐Hoon Lee, 2020. "Corporate social responsibility leadership for sustainable development: An institutional logics perspective in Brazil," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(3), pages 1410-1424, May.
    3. David McPherson, 2013. "Vocational Virtue Ethics: Prospects for a Virtue Ethic Approach to Business," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 116(2), pages 283-296, August.
    4. Smith, Brett R. & McMullen, Jeffery S. & Cardon, Melissa S., 2021. "Toward a theological turn in entrepreneurship: How religion could enable transformative research in our field," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 36(5).
    5. Taylor, Steven S. & Ladkin, Donna, 2014. "Leading as craft-work: The role of studio practices in developing artful leaders," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 30(1), pages 95-103.
    6. Fabien Martinez & Ken Peattie & Diego Vazquez‐Brust, 2019. "Beyond win–win: A syncretic theory on corporate stakeholder engagement in sustainable development," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(5), pages 896-908, July.
    7. Danny Miller & Isabelle Le Breton-Miller, 2021. "Family Firms: A Breed of Extremes?," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 45(4), pages 663-681, July.
    8. Anselmo Vasconcelos, 2010. "Spiritual Development in Organizations: A Religious-based Approach," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 93(4), pages 607-622, June.
    9. Throstur Sigurjonsson & Audur Arnardottir & Vlad Vaiman & Pall Rikhardsson, 2015. "Managers’ Views on Ethics Education in Business Schools: An Empirical Study," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 130(1), pages 1-13, August.
    10. Mladen Djuric & Jovan Filipovic & Stefan Komazec, 2020. "Reshaping the Future of Social Metrology: Utilizing Quality Indicators to Develop Complexity-Based Scientific Human and Social Capital Measurement Model," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 148(2), pages 535-567, April.
    11. Onnolee Nordstrom & Jennifer E. Jennings, 2018. "Looking in the Other Direction: An Ethnographic Analysis of How Family Businesses Can Be Operated to Enhance Familial Well-Being," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 42(2), pages 317-339, March.
    12. Başak Uçanok Tan, 2023. "Effects of Materialist Values and Work Centrality on Organizational Citizenship Behaviors," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(4), pages 21582440231, December.
    13. Isabelle Le Breton-Miller & Danny Miller, 2020. "Ideals-Based Accountability and Reputation in Select Family Firms," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 163(2), pages 183-196, May.
    14. Adam R. Szromek, 2020. "The Importance of Spiritual Values in the Process of Managerial Decision-Making in the Enterprise," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(13), pages 1-15, July.
    15. Jesús Unanue & Xavier Oriol & Juan Carlos Oyanedel & Andrés Rubio & Wenceslao Unanue, 2021. "Gratitude at Work Prospectively Predicts Lower Workplace Materialism: A Three-Wave Longitudinal Study in Chile," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(7), pages 1-17, April.
    16. Bruno Dyck & Rajesh V. Manchanda, 2021. "Sustainable marketing based on virtue ethics: addressing socio-ecological challenges facing humankind," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 11(1), pages 115-132, June.
    17. Fabien Martinez & Ken Peattie & Diego Vazquez‐brust & Diego Vazquez-Brust, 2019. "Beyond win–win: A syncretic theory on corporate stakeholder engagement in sustainable development," Post-Print hal-02887685, HAL.
    18. Stefan Schaltegger & Roger Burritt, 2018. "Business Cases and Corporate Engagement with Sustainability: Differentiating Ethical Motivations," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 147(2), pages 241-259, January.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jomstd:v:42:y:2005:i:4:p:705-735. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0022-2380 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.