IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jomstd/v35y1998i6p699-717.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Organizational Learning Activities in High‐hazard Industries: The Logics Underlying Self‐Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • John S. Carroll

Abstract

Organizational learning takes place through activities performed by individuals, groups, and organizations as they gather and digest information, imagine and plan new actions, and implement change. I examine the learning practices of companies in two industries – nuclear power plants and chemical process plants – that must manage safety as a major component of operations, and therefore must learn from precursors and near‐misses rather than exclusively by trial‐and‐error. Specifically, I analyse the linked assumptions or logics underlying incident reviews, root cause analysis teams, and self‐analysis programmes. These logics arise from occupational and hierarchical groups that work on different problems in different ways – for example, anticipation and resilience, fixing and learning, concrete and abstract. In organizations with fragmentary, myopic and disparate understandings of how the work is accomplished, there are likely to be more failures to learn from operating experience, recurrent problems, and cyclical crises. Enhanced learning requires ways to broaden and bring together disparate logics.

Suggested Citation

  • John S. Carroll, 1998. "Organizational Learning Activities in High‐hazard Industries: The Logics Underlying Self‐Analysis," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 35(6), pages 699-717, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:jomstd:v:35:y:1998:i:6:p:699-717
    DOI: 10.1111/1467-6486.00116
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6486.00116
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/1467-6486.00116?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zhaleh Abdi & Hamid Ravaghi, 2017. "Implementing root cause analysis in Iranian hospitals: challenges and benefits," International Journal of Health Planning and Management, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(2), pages 147-162, April.
    2. Zvi Stern & Tal Katz-Navon & Eitan Naveh, 2008. "The Influence of Situational Learning Orientation, Autonomy, and Voice on Error Making: The Case of Resident Physicians," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 54(9), pages 1553-1564, September.
    3. Nicolini, Davide & Waring, Justin & Mengis, Jeanne, 2011. "Policy and practice in the use of root cause analysis to investigate clinical adverse events: Mind the gap," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 73(2), pages 217-225, July.
    4. Mavis Agyemang Opoku & Suk Bong Choi & Seung-Wan Kang, 2019. "Psychological Safety in Ghana: Empirical Analyses of Antecedents and Consequences," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(1), pages 1-20, December.
    5. Hung-Chung Su, 2017. "The impact of mindful organizing on operational performance: An explorative study," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 10(3), pages 148-157, December.
    6. Manisaligil, Alperen & Gölgeci, İsmail & Bakker, Arnold B. & Faruk Aysan, Ahmet & Babacan, Mehmet & Gür, Nurullah, 2023. "Understanding change in disruptive contexts: The role of the time paradox and locus of control," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
    7. Catherine H. Tinsley & Robin L. Dillon & Matthew A. Cronin, 2012. "How Near-Miss Events Amplify or Attenuate Risky Decision Making," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 58(9), pages 1596-1613, September.
    8. Homsma, Gert J. & Van Dyck, Cathy & De Gilder, Dick & Koopman, Paul L. & Elfring, Tom, 2009. "Learning from error: The influence of error incident characteristics," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 62(1), pages 115-122, January.
    9. Corinne Bieder, 2018. "Safety Culture in a Complex Mix of Safety Models: Are We Missing the Point?," Post-Print hal-02116122, HAL.
    10. Agulles, Remei & Prats, Mª Julia, 2011. "Learning in practice: What organizational and management literature can contribute to professional and occupational development," IESE Research Papers D/938, IESE Business School.
    11. Carroll, John S. & Rudolph, Jenny W. & Hatakenaka, Sachi, 2002. "Problem Investigation in High-Hazard Industries: Creating and Negotiational Learning," Working papers 4360-02, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Sloan School of Management.
    12. Rudolph, Jenny & Hatakenaka, Sachi & Carroll, John S., 2002. "Organizational Learning from Experience in High-Hazard Industries: Problem Investigation as Off-Line Reflective Practice," Working papers 4359-02, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Sloan School of Management.
    13. Deborah Dougherty, 2001. "Reimagining the Differentiation and Integration of Work for Sustained Product Innovation," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 12(5), pages 612-631, October.
    14. Hatakenaka, Sachi & Rudolph, Jenny & Carroll, John S., 2002. "Problem Investigation in High-Hazard Industries: Creating and Negotiational Learning," Working papers 4360-02, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Sloan School of Management.
    15. Peter M. Madsen, 2009. "These Lives Will Not Be Lost in Vain: Organizational Learning from Disaster in U.S. Coal Mining," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 20(5), pages 861-875, October.
    16. Gabriel Szulanski & Rossella Cappetta & Robert J. Jensen, 2004. "When and How Trustworthiness Matters: Knowledge Transfer and the Moderating Effect of Causal Ambiguity," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 15(5), pages 600-613, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jomstd:v:35:y:1998:i:6:p:699-717. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0022-2380 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.