IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/joares/v64y2026i1p181-227.html

Amendment Thresholds and Voting Rules in Debt Contracts

Author

Listed:
  • JUDSON CASKEY
  • KANYUAN HUANG
  • DANIEL SAAVEDRA

Abstract

Most loan contracts in the United States contain a provision for lender voting rules. We study the optimal voting rule that allows lenders to waive a covenant violation. When lenders have heterogeneous preferences, lenient voting rules increase the probability of waivers that allow inefficient investments. Stringent voting rules tend to allocate the marginal vote to lenders who deny waivers after false alarms so that they can renegotiate the loan to extract value from the firm, which incurs deadweight costs. In equilibrium, the optimal voting rule balances these two forces to improve contracting efficiency. We derive and empirically test comparative statics on how the optimal voting rule varies with lenders’ preferences and the borrower's accounting properties. Our model offers a rationale for the prevalent use of voting rule clauses in syndicated loan contracts.

Suggested Citation

  • Judson Caskey & Kanyuan Huang & Daniel Saavedra, 2026. "Amendment Thresholds and Voting Rules in Debt Contracts," Journal of Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 64(1), pages 181-227, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:joares:v:64:y:2026:i:1:p:181-227
    DOI: 10.1111/1475-679X.70011
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-679X.70011
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/1475-679X.70011?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:joares:v:64:y:2026:i:1:p:181-227. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/1475679x .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.