IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jinfst/v74y2023i11p1265-1281.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Information practices around genetic testing for ovarian cancer patients

Author

Listed:
  • Ciaran B. Trace
  • Yan Zhang
  • Siqi Yi
  • Marian Yvette Williams‐Brown

Abstract

Knowledge of ovarian cancer patients' information practices around cancer genetic testing (GT) is needed to inform interventions that promote patient access to GT‐related information. We interviewed 21 ovarian cancer patients and survivors who had GT as part of the treatment process and analyzed the transcripts using the qualitative content analysis method. We found that patients' information practices, manifested in their information‐seeking mode, information sources utilized, information assessment, and information use, showed three distinct styles: passive, semi‐active, and active. Patients with the passive style primarily received information from clinical sources, encountered information, or delegated information‐seeking to family members; they were not inclined to assess information themselves and seldom used it to learn or influence others. Women with semi‐active and active styles adopted more active information‐seeking modes to approach information, utilized information sources beyond clinical settings, attempted to assess the information found, and actively used it to learn, educate others, or advocate GT to family and friends. Guided by the social ecological model, we found multiple levels of influences, including personal, interpersonal, organizational, community, and societal, acting as motivators or barriers to patients' information practice. Based on these findings, we discussed strategies to promote patient access to GT‐related information.

Suggested Citation

  • Ciaran B. Trace & Yan Zhang & Siqi Yi & Marian Yvette Williams‐Brown, 2023. "Information practices around genetic testing for ovarian cancer patients," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 74(11), pages 1265-1281, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:jinfst:v:74:y:2023:i:11:p:1265-1281
    DOI: 10.1002/asi.24823
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.24823
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/asi.24823?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Reijo Savolainen & Leslie Thomson, 2022. "Assessing the theoretical potential of an expanded model for everyday information practices," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 73(4), pages 511-527, April.
    2. Wanda J. Orlikowski, 2002. "Knowing in Practice: Enacting a Collective Capability in Distributed Organizing," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 13(3), pages 249-273, June.
    3. Xiaofeng Li, 2021. "Young people's information practices in library makerspaces," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 72(6), pages 744-758, June.
    4. Kaitlin L. Costello & Tiffany C. Veinot, 2020. "A spectrum of approaches to health information interaction: From avoidance to verification," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 71(8), pages 871-886, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bertrand Pauget & Mathieu Cabrol, 2013. "The role of relational competence in the health care sector," Post-Print hal-00960124, HAL.
    2. Daniela Andreini & Cristina Bettinelli & Nicolai J. Foss & Marco Mismetti, 2022. "Business model innovation: a review of the process-based literature," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 26(4), pages 1089-1121, December.
    3. Hong, Jacky Fok Loi & Snell, Robin Stanley & Easterby-Smith, Mark, 2009. "Knowledge flow and boundary crossing at the periphery of a MNC," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 18(6), pages 539-554, December.
    4. Annie T. Chen, 2022. "Interactions between affect, cognition, and information behavior in the context of fibromyalgia," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 73(1), pages 31-44, January.
    5. Nitin Verma & Kenneth R. Fleischmann & Le Zhou & Bo Xie & Min Kyung Lee & Kate Rich & Kristina Shiroma & Chenyan Jia & Tara Zimmerman, 2022. "Trust in COVID‐19 public health information," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 73(12), pages 1776-1792, December.
    6. Zahra, Shaker A. & Neubaum, Donald O. & Larraneta, Barbara, 2007. "Knowledge sharing and technological capabilities: The moderating role of family involvement," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 60(10), pages 1070-1079, October.
    7. Verena Brinks, 2016. "Situated affect and collective meaning: A community perspective on processes of value creation and commercialization in enthusiast-driven fields," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 48(6), pages 1152-1169, June.
    8. Paul M. Leonardi & Diane E. Bailey & Casey S. Pierce, 2019. "The Coevolution of Objects and Boundaries over Time: Materiality, Affordances, and Boundary Salience," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 30(2), pages 665-686, June.
    9. Milena-Jael Silva-Morales & Sabine Carton, 2014. "L'influence des Artefacts sur l'évolution routines dans les centres de services S.I. : une étude de cas," Post-Print hal-01809617, HAL.
    10. Ferguson, J.E. & Huysman, M.H., 2009. "Between ambition and approach: towards sustainable knowledge management in development organizations," Serie Research Memoranda 0003, VU University Amsterdam, Faculty of Economics, Business Administration and Econometrics.
    11. Paul Vallance, 2011. "Relational and Dialectical Spaces of Knowing: Knowledge, Practice, and Work in Economic Geography," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 43(5), pages 1098-1117, May.
    12. Toshihiro Wakayama, 2008. "Thematic Networks: Structuring the Organization for Strategic Fit," Working Papers EMS_2008_09, Research Institute, International University of Japan.
    13. Marco Taliento, 2022. "The Triple Mission of the Modern University: Component Interplay and Performance Analysis from Italy," World, MDPI, vol. 3(3), pages 1-24, July.
    14. Haradhan Kumar MOHAJAN, 2017. "Roles Of Communities Of Practice For The Development Of The Society," Journal of Economic Development, Environment and People, Alliance of Central-Eastern European Universities, vol. 6(3), pages 27-46, September.
    15. Nugroho, Yanuar, 2011. "Opening the black box: The adoption of innovations in the voluntary sector--The case of Indonesian civil society organisations," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 40(5), pages 761-777, June.
    16. France Bélanger & Mary Beth Watson-Manheim, 2006. "Virtual Teams and Multiple Media: Structuring Media Use to Attain Strategic Goals," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 15(4), pages 299-321, July.
    17. Arne Carlsen, 2006. "Organizational Becoming as Dialogic Imagination of Practice: The Case of the Indomitable Gauls," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 17(1), pages 132-149, February.
    18. Heusinkveld, Stefan & Visscher, Klaasjan, 2012. "Practice what you preach: How consultants frame management concepts as enacted practice," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 28(4), pages 285-297.
    19. Ravenswood, Katherine, 2011. "Eisenhardt's impact on theory in case study research," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 64(7), pages 680-686, July.
    20. Lantto, Anna-Maija, 2022. "Obtaining entity-specific information and dealing with uncertainty: Financial accountants' response to their changing work of financial reporting and the role of boundary objects," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 85(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jinfst:v:74:y:2023:i:11:p:1265-1281. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.asis.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.