IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jinfst/v72y2021i10p1295-1305.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Understanding information: Adding a non‐individualistic lens

Author

Listed:
  • Yuanye Ma

Abstract

The individualistic lens refers to the understanding of problematic information as something that is clearly identifiable, with objective criteria of measurement. This article argues for adding a non‐individualistic lens for understanding information. The necessity for adding a non‐individualistic lens grows from that the existing individualistic lens appears inadequate to make sense of information phenomenon, in particular when it comes to understanding problematic information. Non‐individualistic is proposed as a complementary perspective, which needs to be further developed conceptually. To begin such development, this article directs information professionals' attention to the promising concept of information ecology. More specifically, this article pulls resources from philosophy of information (Floridi's infosphere) and information ethics (Capurro's Angeletics) to illustrate existing conceptualizations of information ecology. Information ecology appears to align with this sociotechnical view that information researchers have started to develop in the most recent years, though arguably information ecology may have an even broader scope. Lastly, this article also points out that the conceptualization of information ecology needs to be aware of, and cautious of the philosophical assumption that is relied on for understanding information.

Suggested Citation

  • Yuanye Ma, 2021. "Understanding information: Adding a non‐individualistic lens," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 72(10), pages 1295-1305, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:jinfst:v:72:y:2021:i:10:p:1295-1305
    DOI: 10.1002/asi.24441
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.24441
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/asi.24441?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Michael K. Buckland, 1991. "Information as thing," Journal of the American Society for Information Science, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 42(5), pages 351-360, June.
    2. Nicholas J. Belkin & Stephen E. Robertson, 1976. "Information science and the phenomenon of information," Journal of the American Society for Information Science, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 27(4), pages 197-204, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. António Madureira & Nico Baken & Harry Bouwman, 2011. "Value of digital information networks: a holonic framework," Netnomics, Springer, vol. 12(1), pages 1-30, April.
    2. Isto Huvila, 2022. "Making and taking information," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 73(4), pages 528-541, April.
    3. David Bawden & Lyn Robinson, 2015. "“Waiting for Carnot”: Information and complexity," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 66(11), pages 2177-2186, November.
    4. Florentin Smarandache & Stefan Vladutescu, 2014. "Communicative universal convertibility Matter-Energy-Information," Social Sciences and Education Research Review, Department of Communication, Journalism and Education Sciences, University of Craiova, vol. 1(1), pages 44-62, December.
    5. Tami Oliphant, 2021. "Emerging (information) realities and epistemic injustice," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 72(8), pages 951-962, August.
    6. Darin Freeburg, 2019. "The Knowing Model: Facilitating Behaviour Change in Organisations," Journal of Information & Knowledge Management (JIKM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 18(04), pages 1-22, December.
    7. Cornelius, Kristin B., 2019. "Zombie contracts, dark patterns of design, and 'documentisation'," Internet Policy Review: Journal on Internet Regulation, Alexander von Humboldt Institute for Internet and Society (HIIG), Berlin, vol. 8(2), pages 1-25.
    8. Laura Skouvig & Jack Andersen, 2015. "Understanding information history from a genre-theoretical perspective," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 66(10), pages 2061-2070, October.
    9. Bharat Mehra, 2023. "Toward an impact‐driven framework to operationalize social justice and implement ICT4D in the field of information," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 74(12), pages 1419-1436, December.
    10. Alarape, A. A. & Adegboye M. O. & Ogunniran O. O & Omoba, F. A, 2021. "Health Information Resources and Clinical Core Skills as Predictors of Medical Doctors Clinical Decision Making in Obafemi Awolowo University Teaching Hospital, Ile-Ife, Nigeria," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 5(6), pages 175-184, June.
    11. Christine L. Borgman, 2012. "The conundrum of sharing research data," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 63(6), pages 1059-1078, June.
    12. Sundqvist, Anneli & Svärd, Proscovia, 2016. "Information culture and records management: a suitable match? Conceptualizations of information culture and their application on records management," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 36(1), pages 9-15.
    13. Lauri Wessel & Martin Gersch & Erik Harloff, 2017. "Talking Past Each Other," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 59(1), pages 23-40, February.
    14. Isto Huvila, 2020. "Use-Oriented Information and Knowledge Management: Information Production and Use Practices as an Element of the Value and Impact of Information," Journal of Information & Knowledge Management (JIKM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 18(04), pages 1-25, January.
    15. Ian Ruthven, 2024. "Information sculpting," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 75(4), pages 483-495, April.
    16. Hannah Augustin & Martin Sudmanns & Dirk Tiede & Stefan Lang & Andrea Baraldi, 2019. "Semantic Earth Observation Data Cubes," Data, MDPI, vol. 4(3), pages 1-19, July.
    17. Darrin Baines & Robert J R Elliott, 2020. "Defining misinformation, disinformation and malinformation: An urgent need for clarity during the COVID-19 infodemic," Discussion Papers 20-06, Department of Economics, University of Birmingham.
    18. Sasvari, Peter, 2012. "The Effects of Technology and Innovation on Society," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 5(1), pages 1-10.
    19. Wayne de Fremery & Michael K. Buckland, 2022. "Copy theory," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 73(3), pages 407-418, March.
    20. Gonçalo Jorge Morais Costa & Nuno Sotero Alves Silva, 2010. "Knowledge versus content in e-learning: A philosophical discussion," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 12(4), pages 399-413, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jinfst:v:72:y:2021:i:10:p:1295-1305. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.asis.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.