IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jcmkts/v60y2022i3p562-579.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How Implementation Affects Revision: EU Decision‐Making on Changing the Posting of Workers Directive

Author

Listed:
  • Bernard Steunenberg

Abstract

In this paper, I focus on how national policy implementation affects policy revision at the EU level. The main argument is that when policy is implemented in a decentralized manner, it affects the current situation or status quo in member states. This affects the possibilities of any further legislative change at the EU level. The analyses suggests that heterogeneity in national preferences and homogeneity in national status quo points make it less easy to adopt a revised policy. This result is illustrated by the recent discussion on revising the Posting of Workers Directive. Having rather different views on this policy while faced with limited possibilities to shape this policy nationally, makes it difficult to change the Posting Directive. The rather long and difficult negotiations, especially among the member states, about its revision support this implication.

Suggested Citation

  • Bernard Steunenberg, 2022. "How Implementation Affects Revision: EU Decision‐Making on Changing the Posting of Workers Directive," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 60(3), pages 562-579, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:jcmkts:v:60:y:2022:i:3:p:562-579
    DOI: 10.1111/jcms.13253
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.13253
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jcms.13253?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Toshkov, Dimiter and Anne Rasmussen, 2012. "Time to Decide: The effect of early agreements on legislative duration in the EU," European Integration online Papers (EIoP), European Community Studies Association Austria (ECSA-A), vol. 16, May.
    2. Bengt Furåker & Bengt Larsson, 2020. "Trade Union Cooperation in Europe," Springer Books, Springer, number 978-3-030-38770-9, January.
    3. Haverland, Markus, 2000. "National Adaptation to European Integration: The Importance of Institutional Veto Points," Journal of Public Policy, Cambridge University Press, vol. 20(1), pages 83-103, April.
    4. repec:bla:jcmkts:v:48:y:2010:i::p:243-264 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. Dimiter Toshkov, 2010. "Taking stock: a review of quantitative studies of transposition and implementation of EU law," Working Papers of the Vienna Institute for European integration research (EIF) 1, Institute for European integration research (EIF).
    6. Antoaneta Dimitrova & Bernard Steunenberg, 2013. "Living in Parallel Universes? Implementing European Movable Cultural Heritage Policy in B ulgaria," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 51(2), pages 246-263, March.
    7. Kees Gelderman & Paul Ghijsen & Jordie Schoonen, 2010. "Explaining Non‐Compliance with European Union Procurement Directives: A Multidisciplinary Perspective," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 48(2), pages 243-264, March.
    8. Bernard Steunenberg, 2010. "Is big brother watching? Commission oversight of the national implementation of EU directives," European Union Politics, , vol. 11(3), pages 359-380, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Carlos Mendez & John Bachtler, 2017. "Financial Compliance in the European Union: A Cross-National Assessment of Financial Correction Patterns and Causes in Cohesion Policy," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 55(3), pages 569-592, May.
    2. Nora Dörrenbächer & Ellen Mastenbroek, 2019. "Passing the buck? Analyzing the delegation of discretion after transposition of European Union law," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 13(1), pages 70-85, March.
    3. Heike Klüver & Iñaki Sagarzazu, 2013. "Ideological congruency and decision-making speed: The effect of partisanship across European Union institutions," European Union Politics, , vol. 14(3), pages 388-407, September.
    4. Carsten Hefeker & Michael Neugart, 2016. "Policy deviations, uncertainty, and the European Court of Justice," European Journal of Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 42(3), pages 547-567, December.
    5. Mehmet Ugur, 2010. "Open‐Ended Membership Prospect and Commitment Credibility: Explaining the Deadlock in EU–Turkey Accession Negotiations," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 48(4), pages 967-991, September.
    6. Gijs Jan Brandsma, 2015. "Co-decision after Lisbon: The politics of informal trilogues in European Union lawmaking," European Union Politics, , vol. 16(2), pages 300-319, June.
    7. Bengt Furåker, 2020. "European trade union cooperation, union density and employee attitudes to unions," Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, , vol. 26(3), pages 345-358, August.
    8. Antoaneta Dimitrova, 2007. "Institutionalization of Imported Rules in the European Union's New Member States: Bringing Politics Back in the Research Agenda," EUI-RSCAS Working Papers 37, European University Institute (EUI), Robert Schuman Centre of Advanced Studies (RSCAS).
    9. Hatton, Timothy J., 2023. "Asylum recognition rates in Europe: Policies and performance," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
    10. Thomas König & Bernd Luig, 2014. "Ministerial gatekeeping and parliamentary involvement in the implementation process of EU directives," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 160(3), pages 501-519, September.
    11. Mühlböck, Monika and Berthold Rittberger, 2015. "The Council, the European Parliament, and the paradox of inter-institutional cooperation," European Integration online Papers (EIoP), European Community Studies Association Austria (ECSA-A), vol. 19, January.
    12. Richard Perkins & Eric Neumayer, 2007. "Implementing Multilateral Environmental Agreements: An Analysis of EU Directives," Global Environmental Politics, MIT Press, vol. 7(3), pages 13-41, August.
    13. Ugur, Mehmet, 2008. "Economic implications of Turkish EU membership: the advantages of tying one's hands," Greenwich Papers in Political Economy 3984, University of Greenwich, Greenwich Political Economy Research Centre.
    14. Daniel Finke, 2020. "At loggerheads over state aid: Why the Commission rejects aid and governments comply," European Union Politics, , vol. 21(3), pages 474-496, September.
    15. Logmani, Jacqueline & Krott, Max & Lecyk, Michal Tymoteusz & Giessen, Lukas, 2017. "Customizing elements of the International Forest Regime Complex in Poland? Non-implementation of a National Forest Programme and redefined transposition of NATURA 2000 in Bialowieza Forest," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 81-90.
    16. Tanja Börzel & Thomas Risse, 2000. "International Relations Theory and European Integration," EUI-RSCAS Working Papers 56, European University Institute (EUI), Robert Schuman Centre of Advanced Studies (RSCAS).
    17. Karen M. Anderson & Michael Kaeding, 2015. "European Integration and Pension Policy Change: Variable Patterns of Europeanization in Italy, the Netherlands and Belgium," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 53(2), pages 231-253, June.
    18. Molenaers, Nadia & Dellepiane, Sebastian & Faust, Jorg, 2015. "Political Conditionality and Foreign Aid," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 2-12.
    19. Irene Dingeldey & Ilana Nussbaum Bitran, 2024. "The European Minimum Wage Directive – and why it is a challenge to trade unions’ but not employers’ unity," Economic and Industrial Democracy, Department of Economic History, Uppsala University, Sweden, vol. 45(2), pages 489-510, May.
    20. Vibeke Wøien Hansen, 2014. "Incomplete information and bargaining in the EU: An explanation of first-reading non-agreements," European Union Politics, , vol. 15(4), pages 472-495, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jcmkts:v:60:y:2022:i:3:p:562-579. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0021-9886 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.