IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/intlab/v161y2022i4p635-655.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Segmenting and equalizing narratives in the ILO's standard‐setting practice

Author

Listed:
  • Jenny HAHS
  • Ulrich MÜCKENBERGER

Abstract

In shaping the employment relationship internationally, the ILO initially reproduced the Western normative narrative of the standard employment relationship (SER). When the global South and women gained a stronger voice within the ILO, a contrasting egalitarian narrative emerged, challenging the SER hegemony and creating a layering of narratives. Combining historical institutionalism and structuration theory, the authors follow the development of these narratives and consider how the resultant legal and normative conflicts between them can be explained by focusing on the composition of ILO membership and the representation of women in International Labour Conferences over time. The authors draw a number of legal‐political conclusions from their findings.

Suggested Citation

  • Jenny HAHS & Ulrich MÜCKENBERGER, 2022. "Segmenting and equalizing narratives in the ILO's standard‐setting practice," International Labour Review, International Labour Organization, vol. 161(4), pages 635-655, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:intlab:v:161:y:2022:i:4:p:635-655
    DOI: 10.1111/ilr.12344
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/ilr.12344
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/ilr.12344?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ursula Kulke & Emmanuelle Saint‐Pierre Guilbault, 2013. "The Social Protection Floors Recommendation, 2012 (No. 202): Completing the standards to close the coverage gap," International Social Security Review, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 66(3-4), pages 87-109, July.
    2. Valerio DE STEFANO, 2021. "Not as simple as it seems: The ILO and the personal scope of international labour standards," International Labour Review, International Labour Organization, vol. 160(3), pages 387-406, September.
    3. Simon Deakin, 2013. "Addressing Labour Market Segmentation: The Role of Labour Law," Working Papers wp446, Centre for Business Research, University of Cambridge.
    4. Antonio ALOISI & Valerio DE STEFANO, 2020. "Regulation and the future of work: The employment relationship as an innovation facilitator," International Labour Review, International Labour Organization, vol. 159(1), pages 47-69, March.
    5. repec:ilo:ilowps:483448 is not listed on IDEAS
    6. Deakin, S. F., 2013. "Addressing labour market segmentation : the role of labour law," ILO Working Papers 994834483402676, International Labour Organization.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ravi Srivastava, 2019. "Emerging Dynamics of Labour Market Inequality in India: Migration, Informality, Segmentation and Social Discrimination," The Indian Journal of Labour Economics, Springer;The Indian Society of Labour Economics (ISLE), vol. 62(2), pages 147-171, June.
    2. Irene DINGELDEY & Jean‐Yves GERLITZ, 2022. "Not just black and white, but different shades of grey: Legal segmentation and its effect on labour market segmentation in Europe," International Labour Review, International Labour Organization, vol. 161(4), pages 593-613, December.
    3. World Bank Group, 2016. "Paving the Way for Women’s Economic Inclusion in the Gulf Cooperation Council," World Bank Publications - Reports 24419, The World Bank Group.
    4. Ulrich MÜCKENBERGER & Irene DINGELDEY, 2022. "Introduction: Worldwide patterns of legal segmentation in employment law," International Labour Review, International Labour Organization, vol. 161(4), pages 511-534, December.
    5. Veronica Sheen, 2017. "The implications of Australian women’s precarious employment for the later pension age," The Economic and Labour Relations Review, , vol. 28(1), pages 3-19, March.
    6. Mónica Jiménez, 2017. "La calidad del empleo y sus consecuencias para el mercado de trabajo de las medianas y grandes empresas y del sector público de argentina," Revista Economía, Fondo Editorial - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú, vol. 40(79), pages 133-180.
    7. Bjarke Refslund & Annette Thörnquist, 2016. "Intra-European labour migration and low-wage competition—comparing the Danish and Swedish experiences across three sectors," Industrial Relations Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 47(1), pages 62-78, January.
    8. Zoe Adams & Louise Bishop & Simon Deakin & Colin Fenwick & Sara Martinsson Garzelli & Giudy Rusconi & Centre for Business Research, 2018. "The Economic Significance of Laws Relating to Employment Protection & Different Forms of Employment: Analysis of a Panel of 117 Countries, 1990-2013," Working Papers wp500, Centre for Business Research, University of Cambridge.
    9. Norlander, Peter & Erickson, Christopher, 2022. "The Role of Institutions in Job Teleworkability Before and After the Covid-19 Pandemic," GLO Discussion Paper Series 1172, Global Labor Organization (GLO).
    10. Moshfique Uddin & Anup Chowdhury & Geoffrey Wood, 2022. "The resilience of the British and European goods industry: Challenge of Brexit," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 31(4), pages 934-954.
    11. Julieta Haidar, 2023. "The multidimensional configuration of platform work: A mixed-methods analysis of the Argentinian case," Economic and Industrial Democracy, Department of Economic History, Uppsala University, Sweden, vol. 44(4), pages 938-963, November.
    12. Melián-González, Santiago, 2022. "Gig economy delivery services versus professional service companies: Consumers’ perceptions of food-delivery services," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 69(C).
    13. Romanus Osabohien & Haoma Worgwu & Syed Kashif Rafi & Oluwasogo Adediran & Oluwatoyin Matthew & Busayo Aderounmu, 2022. "Impact of business innovation on future employment in Nigeria," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 43(8), pages 3795-3806, December.
    14. Fatemeh Hamedanian, 2022. "Access to the European Labor Market for Immigrant Women in the Wake of the COVID Pandemic," World, MDPI, vol. 3(4), pages 1-22, November.
    15. Douglas Amuli Ibale, 2020. "Earning structure and heterogeneity of the labor market: Evidence from DR Congo," LIDAM Discussion Papers IRES 2020037, Université catholique de Louvain, Institut de Recherches Economiques et Sociales (IRES).
    16. Bakyt Beknazarov & Roza Niyazbekova & Ussen Amirseitov & Aiganym Kokenova & Marzhan Daurbayeva & Madina Aitkazina, 2020. "Development of entrepreneurship and forms of self-employment in the innovative sectors of the economy," Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 8(2), pages 209-228, December.
    17. Julie M É Garneau & Sara Pérez-Lauzon & Christian Lévesque, 2023. "Digitalisation of work in aerospace manufacturing: expanding union frames and repertoires of action in Belgium, Canada and Denmark," Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, , vol. 29(1), pages 139-154, February.
    18. Kaltenborn Markus, 2017. "Overcoming Extreme Poverty by Social Protection Floors – Approaches to Closing the Right to Social Security Gap," The Law and Development Review, De Gruyter, vol. 10(2), pages 237-273, October.
    19. Paola Tubaro & Antonio A. Casilli & Marion Coville, 2020. "The trainer, the verifier, the imitator: Three ways in which human platform workers support artificial intelligence," Post-Print hal-02554196, HAL.
    20. Valerio DE STEFANO, 2021. "Not as simple as it seems: The ILO and the personal scope of international labour standards," International Labour Review, International Labour Organization, vol. 160(3), pages 387-406, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:intlab:v:161:y:2022:i:4:p:635-655. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ilounch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.