IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/indrel/v57y2026i2p140-149.html

Tracks of Solidarity: Public Opinion and Railway Worker Strikes

Author

Listed:
  • Steven David Pickering
  • Martin Ejnar Hansen

Abstract

This study investigates the factors influencing public support for railway worker strikes in the United Kingdom. Using a seven‐wave survey conducted from December 2022 to October 2023, the paper explores the relationship between public opinion and strike action in the context of British railways. Our analysis considers socioeconomic, political, and geographical factors. Key findings indicate significant variation in support based on political alignment, with right‐leaning individuals and those who voted Conservative in the 2019 General Election showing less support for strikes. Surprisingly, proximity to railway stations and income levels did not significantly impact public support. Regional analysis reveals the North East of England, an area with lower rail usage, exhibits higher support for strikes. Furthermore, we find higher levels of support for strikes among ethnic minority groups. This paper contributes to understanding public sentiments on transport strikes, highlighting the complexity of public opinion shaped by political and regional factors. These insights are useful for policymakers and trades unions in addressing the challenges of public transport strikes and their broader societal impacts.

Suggested Citation

  • Steven David Pickering & Martin Ejnar Hansen, 2026. "Tracks of Solidarity: Public Opinion and Railway Worker Strikes," Industrial Relations Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 57(2), pages 140-149, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:indrel:v:57:y:2026:i:2:p:140-149
    DOI: 10.1111/irj.70021
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/irj.70021
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/irj.70021?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:indrel:v:57:y:2026:i:2:p:140-149. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0019-8692 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.