IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/ijurrs/v48y2024i1p94-110.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

UNHOMING, TRAUMA AND WAITING: The Post‐Grenfell Building Safety Crisis in England

Author

Listed:
  • Jenny Preece
  • John Flint

Abstract

In this article we seek to advance our understanding of unhoming in a population not previously perceived to be vulnerable to such processes. We examine the particular forms of trauma in an emergent space of urban marginality, which has arisen through the fracturing of longstanding citizen–state relations and the rupturing of habitual orientations to home in a world that had hitherto been knowable and predictable. In this article we highlight the centrality of waiting in experiences of unhoming, which act as a mechanism of domination over a group newly subject to a specific manifestation of marginality; this mechanism has particular significance for understanding the differentiated dynamics of urban displacement. In this article we utilize interviews with 31 residents of residential flats in England living in buildings affected by fire safety defects, identified following the 2017 Grenfell Tower fire disaster in London in which 72 individuals died. We argue that research on urban dispossession needs to be attentive to distinctive processes and consequences of—and resistance to—unhoming. The experiences of newly affected populations unmask the underpinning precarity and unequal power relations of housing‐based urban citizenship.

Suggested Citation

  • Jenny Preece & John Flint, 2024. "UNHOMING, TRAUMA AND WAITING: The Post‐Grenfell Building Safety Crisis in England," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 48(1), pages 94-110, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:ijurrs:v:48:y:2024:i:1:p:94-110
    DOI: 10.1111/1468-2427.13213
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.13213
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/1468-2427.13213?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:ijurrs:v:48:y:2024:i:1:p:94-110. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0309-1317 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.