IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/ijurrs/v38y2014i5p1904-1917.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Critical Urban Theory versus Critical Urban Studies: A Review Debate

Author

Listed:
  • Peter Marcuse
  • David Imbroscio
  • Simon Parker
  • Jonathan S. Davies
  • Warren Magnusson

Abstract

Critical urban theory and critical urban studies form the subject of two recent edited collections on approaches to the analysis and transformation of the contemporary capitalist city. In an exchange of commentaries by the respective editors and contributors, the introduction explains the genesis of each book and previews some of the key observations. Peter Marcuse then offers his assessment of Critical Urban Studies: New Directions, which is reciprocated by a commentary on Cities for People, Not for Profit: Critical Urban Theory and the Right to the City by Jonathan Davies, David Imbroscio and Warren Magnusson.

Suggested Citation

  • Peter Marcuse & David Imbroscio & Simon Parker & Jonathan S. Davies & Warren Magnusson, 2014. "Critical Urban Theory versus Critical Urban Studies: A Review Debate," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(5), pages 1904-1917, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:ijurrs:v:38:y:2014:i:5:p:1904-1917
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1111/1468-2427.12151
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Medearis, John, 2005. "Social Movements and Deliberative Democratic Theory," British Journal of Political Science, Cambridge University Press, vol. 35(1), pages 53-75, January.
    2. Elizabeth Frazer & Kimberly Hutchings, 2011. "Virtuous Violence and the Politics of Statecraft in Machiavelli, Clausewitz and Weber," Political Studies, Political Studies Association, vol. 59(1), pages 56-73, March.
    3. Jonathan S Davies, 2012. "Network Governance Theory: A Gramscian Critique," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 44(11), pages 2687-2704, November.
    4. Sabine Horlitz & Anne Vogelpohl, 2009. "Something Can Be Done! — A Report on the Conference ‘Right to the City. Prospects for Critical Urban Theory and Practice’, Berlin November 2008," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(4), pages 1067-1072, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Khandakar Farid Uddin & Awais Piracha, 2023. "Neoliberalism, Power, and Right to the City and the Urban Divide in Sydney, Australia," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-18, February.
    2. Sophie Gonick, 2016. "From Occupation to Recuperation: Property, Politics and Provincialization in Contemporary Madrid," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 40(4), pages 833-848, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jonathan Davies, 2014. "Rethinking urban power and the local state: Hegemony, domination and resistance in neoliberal cities," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 51(15), pages 3215-3232, November.
    2. Maria-Lluïsa Marsal-Llacuna, 2017. "Building Universal Socio-cultural Indicators for Standardizing the Safeguarding of Citizens’ Rights in Smart Cities," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 130(2), pages 563-579, January.
    3. Ana Moragues-Faus & Roberta Sonnino, 2019. "Re-assembling sustainable food cities: An exploration of translocal governance and its multiple agencies," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 56(4), pages 778-794, March.
    4. Olga Krasnyak, 2023. "The Cold War statecraft and public diplomacy: assessing US-Soviet scientific-technical exchanges," Place Branding and Public Diplomacy, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 19(1), pages 54-63, March.
    5. Jonathan S. Davies, 2007. "The Limits of Partnership: An Exit‐Action Strategy for Local Democratic Inclusion," Political Studies, Political Studies Association, vol. 55(4), pages 779-800, December.
    6. Vara-Sánchez, Isabel & Gallar-Hernández, David & García-García, Lidia & Morán Alonso, Nerea & Moragues-Faus, Ana, 2021. "The co-production of urban food policies: Exploring the emergence of new governance spaces in three Spanish cities," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    7. Mustafa Kemal Bayırbağ & Jonathan S Davies & Sybille Münch, 2017. "Interrogating urban crisis: Cities in the governance and contestation of austerity," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 54(9), pages 2023-2038, July.
    8. Nannan Zhao & Yuting Liu & June Wang, 2021. "Network Governance and the Evolving Urban Regeneration Policymaking in China: A Case Study of Insurgent Practices in Enninglu Redevelopment Project," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-18, February.
    9. Richard A. Courtney, 2018. "Network governance in the heritage ecology," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 22(3), pages 689-705, September.
    10. Jonathan S Davies & Ismael Blanco, 2017. "Austerity urbanism: Patterns of neo-liberalisation and resistance in six cities of Spain and the UK," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 49(7), pages 1517-1536, July.
    11. Yvonne Tobias-Miersch, 2017. "Beyond trust: towards a practice-based understanding of governing ‘network organizations’," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 21(2), pages 473-498, June.
    12. Mustafa Kemal Bayırbağ & Mehmet Penpecioğlu, 2017. "Urban crisis: ‘Limits to governance of alienation’," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 54(9), pages 2056-2071, July.
    13. Roel During & Kristof Van Assche & Rosalie Van Dam, 2022. "Relating Social and Ecological Resilience: Dutch Citizen’s Initiatives for Biodiversity," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-20, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:ijurrs:v:38:y:2014:i:5:p:1904-1917. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0309-1317 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.