IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/glopol/v15y2024is4p84-96.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Contested ‘commune rurales’: Decentralisation and the (violent) struggle for public authority in the Democratic Republic of Congo

Author

Listed:
  • Karen Büscher
  • Stephanie Perazzone
  • Jeroen Cuvelier
  • Stephane Lumbu
  • Espoir Rwakira
  • Paul Bulambo
  • Chrispin Mvano Yabauma
  • Godefroid Muzalia

Abstract

This article explores how decentralisation policy and specifically the establishment of communes rurales in DR Congo turned into a profoundly destabilising juncture, shaking existing governance arrangements. In particular, we examine how this has led to a reshuffle of power and a renegotiation of public authoritiy. By analysing the impact of decentralisation on the construction of and competition over public authority in three Congolese towns – Rubaya, Minembwe and Fungurume – we demonstrate how decentralisation is deeply politicised, with conflicting governance actors mobilising their power in an attempt to secure their claim to public authority. We argue that the establishment of communes rurales in eastern and southeastern DRC should be therefore understood as a strongly destabilising moment, changing the access of governance actors to resources and repertoires from which they build and legitimise their public authority. Depending on the specific context of the local political arena and its entanglements with larger struggles for power and control, this destabilising moment bears the potential for (violent) conflict. As such, we conclude that decentralisation has failed to live up to its promises of stability and peace while generating new sets of political fault lines and a re‐activation of (violent) conflict.

Suggested Citation

  • Karen Büscher & Stephanie Perazzone & Jeroen Cuvelier & Stephane Lumbu & Espoir Rwakira & Paul Bulambo & Chrispin Mvano Yabauma & Godefroid Muzalia, 2024. "Contested ‘commune rurales’: Decentralisation and the (violent) struggle for public authority in the Democratic Republic of Congo," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 15(S4), pages 84-96, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:glopol:v:15:y:2024:i:s4:p:84-96
    DOI: 10.1111/1758-5899.13309
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.13309
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/1758-5899.13309?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:glopol:v:15:y:2024:i:s4:p:84-96. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/lsepsuk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.