IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/gender/v33y2026i3p1117-1136.html

The Fables of the Academic Zoo: De‐Legitimizing Dominant Micro‐Practices Through Storytelling and Caring

Author

Listed:
  • Christa Sathish
  • Anne‐Wil Harzing

Abstract

Contemporary academia is like a zoo where academics, like caged animals, are confined by dominant micro‐practices, creating an individualistic, competitive, and output‐driven neoliberal ecosystem. Although prior research highlights these practices, little is known about how to dismantle them, and rewrite the academic script. In this article, we unveil how to collectively de‐legitimize our dominant micro‐practices, transcending traditional writing by telling the fables of the Academic Zoo and creating a radically imaginative theory. We foster a reflexive recognition of our dominant micro‐practices, revealing their hidden logics, and challenging their illusion of inevitability. Through our fables and their associated morals, we construct a three‐phased process model of recognition, disruption, and transformation—embedded in our conceptual foundation of narrative theory and the ethics‐of‐care—in which academics collectively weaken the legitimacy of dominant micro‐practices and create opportunities for alternative ways of organizing. We call on academics to C.A.R.E—create awareness of our dominant narratives, alter the naturalized perception of these narratives through questioning and deconstruction, redistribute responsibility for disruptive counter‐action, and establish and embed care‐full alternatives—supporting the creation of a more inclusive and humane academic ecosystem where “Together We Can Make a Difference”!

Suggested Citation

  • Christa Sathish & Anne‐Wil Harzing, 2026. "The Fables of the Academic Zoo: De‐Legitimizing Dominant Micro‐Practices Through Storytelling and Caring," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(3), pages 1117-1136, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:gender:v:33:y:2026:i:3:p:1117-1136
    DOI: 10.1111/gwao.70088
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/gwao.70088
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/gwao.70088?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Marieke Brink & Yvonne Benschop, 2014. "Gender in Academic Networking: The Role of Gatekeepers in Professorial Recruitment," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 51(3), pages 460-492, May.
    2. Richard Watermeyer, 2024. "The gendered minoritisation of public engagement with research," Chapters, in: Alis Oancea & Gemma E. Derrick & Nuzha Nuseibeh & Xin Xu (ed.), Handbook of Meta-Research, chapter 28, pages 356-364, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    3. Anke Strauβ & Ilaria Boncori, 2020. "Foreign women in academia: Double‐strangers between productivity, marginalization and resistance," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(6), pages 1004-1019, November.
    4. André Spicer & Mats Alvesson, 2025. "Critical Management Studies: A Critical Review," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 62(1), pages 446-483, January.
    5. Ajnesh Prasad, 2025. "Transcending Boundaries: Reimagining the Possibilities of Scholarship," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(5), pages 1677-1680, September.
    6. Andrew D. Brown, 1998. "Narrative, Politics and Legitimacy in an IT Implementation," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 35(1), pages 35-58, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Andrew J. Setterstrom, 2023. "Grasping for Intraorganizational Power: A Multi-Case Study Analysis of Dysfunctional Functional Behaviours by Information Technology Personnel," International Journal of Management Science and Business Administration, Inovatus Services Ltd., vol. 10(1), pages 36-41, November.
    2. Samia Chreim, 2005. "The Continuity–Change Duality in Narrative Texts of Organizational Identity," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 42(3), pages 567-593, May.
    3. Christopher Marquis & Cuili Qian, 2014. "Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting in China: Symbol or Substance?," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 25(1), pages 127-148, February.
    4. Brown, Andrew D., 2018. "Making sense of the war in Afghanistan," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 43-56.
    5. Jolanta Maj & Aneta Hamza‐Orlinska & Inessa Sytnik & Artem Stopochkin & Mustafa Özbilgin, 2025. "Misrecognition and labor market inclusion of refugee mothers," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(2), pages 653-672, March.
    6. Esther Chan & Di Di & Elaine Howard Ecklund, 2024. "Scientists explain the underrepresentation of women in physics compared to biology in four national contexts," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(2), pages 399-418, March.
    7. Vanda Papafilippou & Susan Durbin & Hazel Conley, 2022. "Women's formal networking: The relationship between networking activities and power," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(5), pages 1712-1741, September.
    8. Zhou, Dan & Kautonen, Mika & Dai, Weiqi & Zhang, Hui, 2021. "Exploring how digitalization influences incumbents in financial services: The role of entrepreneurial orientation, firm assets, and organizational legitimacy," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    9. Lucia Cervi & David Knights, 2022. "Organizing male infertility: Masculinities and fertility treatment," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(4), pages 1113-1131, July.
    10. Abramo, Giovanni & D’Angelo, Ciriaco Andrea, 2026. "Sex bias in peer review and citation practices: Implications for research evaluation," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 20(1).
    11. Cruz-Suarez, Ana & Prado-Román, Alberto & Prado-Román, Miguel, 2014. "Cognitive legitimacy, resource access, and organizational outcomes," RAE - Revista de Administração de Empresas, FGV-EAESP Escola de Administração de Empresas de São Paulo (Brazil), vol. 54(5), September.
    12. Faulconbridge, James R. & Muzio, Daniel, 2021. "Valuation devices and the dynamic legitimacy-performativity nexus: The case of PEP in the English legal profession," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    13. Asad Aman, 2019. "Managing Internal Marketing Channel Conflict: A Proposal for Narrative Epistemology," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 20(4), pages 901-916, August.
    14. Melissa Carr, 2026. "Bring Your Whole Self to Work: Boundary Conditions of Subjectivity in Diversity and Inclusion Discourse on Investment Bank Websites," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 203(3), pages 489-505, January.
    15. Francisco Díez-Martín & Alicia Blanco-González & Camilo Prado-Román, 2021. "The intellectual structure of organizational legitimacy research: a co-citation analysis in business journals," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 15(4), pages 1007-1043, May.
    16. Yogesh K. Dwivedi & David Wastell & Sven Laumer & Helle Zinner Henriksen & Michael D. Myers & Deborah Bunker & Amany Elbanna & M. N. Ravishankar & Shirish C. Srivastava, 2015. "Research on information systems failures and successes: Status update and future directions," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 17(1), pages 143-157, February.
    17. Jianhong Zhang & David L. Deephouse & Désirée van Gorp & Haico Ebbers, 2022. "Individuals’ Perceptions of the Legitimacy of Emerging Market Multinationals: Ethical Foundations and Construct Validation," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 176(4), pages 801-825, April.
    18. Shoshana Grossbard & Tansel Yilmazer & Lingrui Zhang, 2018. "The Gender Gap in Citations: Lessons from Demographic Economics Journals," Working Papers 2018-078, Human Capital and Economic Opportunity Working Group.
    19. Margaretha Järvinen & Nanna Mik-Meyer, 2025. "Turning Social Capital into Scientific Capital: Men’s Networking in Academia," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 39(1), pages 24-42, February.
    20. Pipiet Larasatie & Dagmar Karisch-Gierer & Alice Ludvig, 2022. "Women’s Woodland Owner Network: A Comparative Case Study of Oregon (the United States) and Austria," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-14, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:gender:v:33:y:2026:i:3:p:1117-1136. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0968-6673 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.