IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/finrev/v58y2023i4p657-661.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

For corporate finance to truly advance we need more genuinely testable models

Author

Listed:
  • Matthew Spiegel

Abstract

Corporate finance has turned into a field where researchers produce what seem like a constant flow of disconnected papers. Theories are never confirmed or refuted. At best, empirical papers confirm models without a realistic alternative to refute. The problem is that today's models are either static or have firms that never interact directly with other firms. Most industries are oligopolies. For firms in these industries the competition's actions in the product market are likely of paramount importance. If corporate finance is going to progress, we need papers with testable dynamic oligopoly models. Models where firms compete directly with each other.

Suggested Citation

  • Matthew Spiegel, 2023. "For corporate finance to truly advance we need more genuinely testable models," The Financial Review, Eastern Finance Association, vol. 58(4), pages 657-661, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:finrev:v:58:y:2023:i:4:p:657-661
    DOI: 10.1111/fire.12346
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/fire.12346
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/fire.12346?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Li, Xuelin & Liu, Tong & Taylor, Lucian A., 2023. "Common ownership and innovation efficiency," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 147(3), pages 475-497.
    2. Huang, Jingong & Xie, Taojun, 2023. "Technology centrality, bilateral knowledge spillovers and mergers and acquisitions," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    3. Natalia Lazzati & Amilcar A. Menichini, 2015. "A Dynamic Model of the Firm: Structural Explanations of Key Empirical Findings," The Financial Review, Eastern Finance Association, vol. 50(3), pages 341-361, August.
    4. Matthew Spiegel & Heather Tookes, 2013. "Dynamic Competition, Valuation, and Merger Activity," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 68(1), pages 125-172, February.
    5. Hajda, Jakub & Nikolov, Boris, 2022. "Product market strategy and corporate policies," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 146(3), pages 932-964.
    6. Matthew Spiegel & Heather Tookes, 2020. "Why Does an IPO Affect Rival Firms?," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 33(7), pages 3205-3249.
    7. Gan, Liu & Xia, Xin & Zhang, Hai, 2022. "Debt structure and debt overhang," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    8. Jordan Martel & Kenneth Mirkin & Brian Waters, 2022. "Learning by Owning in a Lemons Market," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 77(3), pages 1737-1785, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. David J. Denis, 2024. "Is corporate finance research in decline?," The Financial Review, Eastern Finance Association, vol. 59(2), pages 257-264, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Li, Jay Y. & Tang, Dragon Yongjun, 2022. "Product market competition with CDS," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 73(C).
    2. Sohail AMJED* & S.M. Amir SHAH**, 2017. "The Impact of Leverage Variances on Growth: A Longitudinal Study of Pakistan’s Corporate Sector," Pakistan Journal of Applied Economics, Applied Economics Research Centre, vol. 27(2), pages 249-266.
    3. Engelbert J. Dockner & Helmut Elsinger & Andrea Gaunersdorfer, 2018. "The Strategic Role of Dividends and Debt in Markets with Imperfect Competition," Dynamic Games and Applications, Springer, vol. 8(3), pages 601-619, September.
    4. Frank Packer & Mark M Spiegel, 2020. "Competitive effects of IPOs: evidence from Chinese listing suspensions," BIS Working Papers 888, Bank for International Settlements.
    5. Wang, Wenyu & Wu, Yufeng, 2020. "Managerial control benefits and takeover market efficiency," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 136(3), pages 857-878.
    6. Hammoudeh, Mosab & Nain, Amrita & Qian, Yiming, 2022. "The role of divestitures in horizontal mergers11We thank Jon Garfinkel, Jayant Kale, Kai Li, Gordon Philips, Anand Vijh, Thomas Wollmann, David Ravenscraft and participants at the 2016 American Financ," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    7. Wang, Shuangjin & Zhang, Xiaoqian & Cebula, Richard J. & Foley, Maggie, 2024. "Cross-shareholding, Managerial capabilities, and Strategic risk-taking in enterprises: A game or a win-win?," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 62(PB).
    8. Wang, Zongrun & Zhang, Taiyu & Ren, Xiaohang & Shi, Yukun, 2024. "AI adoption rate and corporate green innovation efficiency: Evidence from Chinese energy companies," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 132(C).
    9. Ma, Ruichen & Pan, Xiaofei & Suardi, Sandy, 2024. "The quest for green horizons: Can political turnovers drive green investments? New evidence from China," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 132(C).
    10. Fengguang Lyu & Zhiping Zhang & Guangxin Fu & Zhangxin (Frank) Liu & Sirimon Treepongkaruna, 2024. "Multiple shareholding institutional investors and green governance of heavy‐polluting industries," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(4), pages 3569-3587, May.
    11. Bo Becker & Victoria Ivashina, 2023. "Disruption and Credit Markets," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 78(1), pages 105-139, February.
    12. Aghamolla, Cyrus & Thakor, Richard T., 2022. "IPO peer effects," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 144(1), pages 206-226.
    13. Füner, Lena & Berger, Marius & Bersch, Johannes & Hottenrott, Hanna, 2023. "Local networks and new business formation," ZEW Discussion Papers 23-067, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
    14. Jing Zhang & Kai Li & Cheryl Xiaoning Long, 2024. "Institutional investors, competition and corporate innovation: Evidence from Chinese listed firms," Economics of Transition and Institutional Change, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 32(2), pages 583-615, April.
    15. Menichini, Amilcar A., 2020. "How do firm characteristics affect the corporate income tax revenue?," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 146-162.
    16. Guthrie, Graeme, 2024. "Farm debt and the over-exploitation of natural capital," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    17. Zhang, Jinjin & Chen, Huili & Zhang, Pengdong & Jiang, Min, 2022. "Product market competition and the value of corporate cash: An agency theory explanation," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
    18. Wang, Wenyu, 2018. "Bid anticipation, information revelation, and merger gains," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 128(2), pages 320-343.
    19. Tang, Xudong & Wang, Lin, 2024. "When your friend takes a fall: Spillovers of patent infringement lawsuits on firm innovation via cross-owners," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 131(C).
    20. Marco Testoni, 2022. "The market value spillovers of technological acquisitions: Evidence from patent‐text analysis," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 43(5), pages 964-985, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:finrev:v:58:y:2023:i:4:p:657-661. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/efaaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.