IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

Taxation of European Farmers

Listed author(s):
  • Berkeley Hill
  • Carmel Cahill
Registered author(s):

    summary The special treatments that farmers and landowners receive in national systems of taxation and social security are a little-studied way in which governments are involved with agriculture and provide it with support. As policy instruments they can be an alternative to programmes that involve government expenditure. A recent OECD inventory covering taxes on income, property (annual, transfers and capital gains) and inputs (such as duty on fuel) has found that special treatments of agriculture are widespread in Europe, mostly in the form of concessions relative to the arrangements applied to other industries and occupations. They represent an accumulation of responses to particular problems, many of which have receded into history. But once in place special treatments are often difficult to remove. Agricultural concessions influence the pattern of production in the short-term and the structure of the industry and its output in the longer term. The present inventory reveals inconsistency and contains conflicts with other policy aims. The lack of transparency and difficulty of establishing clearly what is a preferential treatment, together with important information gaps, suggests that further study and evaluation of tax concessions is required. Nevertheless, special treatment of agriculture is too important to be ignored. Copyright The Agricultural Ecomomics Society and the European Association of Agricultural Economists 2007.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    File Function: link to full text
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.

    Article provided by The Agricultural Economics Society in its journal EuroChoices.

    Volume (Year): 6 (2007)
    Issue (Month): 1 (April)
    Pages: 44-49

    in new window

    Handle: RePEc:bla:eurcho:v:6:y:2007:i:1:p:44-49
    Contact details of provider: Web page:

    More information through EDIRC

    Order Information: Web:

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:eurcho:v:6:y:2007:i:1:p:44-49. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Wiley-Blackwell Digital Licensing)

    or (Christopher F. Baum)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.