IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/ehsrev/v79y2026i2p471-495.html

Segmentation and gender wage disparities in the early industrial workforce: Insights from Arkwright's Lumford Mill, 1786–1811

Author

Listed:
  • Alexander Tertzakian

Abstract

This article examines the gender wage gap and wage setting in the early cotton spinning factories of the industrial revolution, with a specific focus on Richard Arkwright's Lumford Mill in Bakewell, Derbyshire. The research links workers from the mill's wage books with parish baptism records to estimate ages and construct age–wage profiles in the spinning department. Findings show a significant gender wage gap emerging in adulthood, with women's wages stagnating while men advanced to higher‐paying roles such as overseers, indicating limited advancement for women. However, there is little evidence of gender wage discrimination among child workers. The gendered segmentation of the spinning workforce towards adulthood was the main cause of the wage gap. The analysis also reveals that weekly wage rates for children increased annually until adulthood. In rural mills such as Arkwright's, attracting labour was crucial. Yearly wage increases incentivized loyalty and ensured workforce stability, despite potential mismatches between wages and worker productivity.

Suggested Citation

  • Alexander Tertzakian, 2026. "Segmentation and gender wage disparities in the early industrial workforce: Insights from Arkwright's Lumford Mill, 1786–1811," Economic History Review, Economic History Society, vol. 79(2), pages 471-495, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:ehsrev:v:79:y:2026:i:2:p:471-495
    DOI: 10.1111/ehr.70019
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/ehr.70019
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/ehr.70019?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:ehsrev:v:79:y:2026:i:2:p:471-495. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ehsukea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.