IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/ecopol/v38y2026i2p357-377.html

Does the Popularity of the Incumbent Mayor Matter for Investment Activity? Evidence From Polish Municipalities

Author

Listed:
  • Monika Banaszewska

Abstract

This paper investigates whether the intensity of the political budget cycle in investment expenditures depends on the incumbent mayor's popularity in the preceding elections. Using a panel of 2479 Polish municipalities over the period 2004–2020 and data from six municipal elections, the analysis employs fixed‐effects estimations to identify the relationship between electoral incentives and budget behavior. The results show that increases in overall investment expenditures during pre‐election and election years are negatively associated with the incumbent mayor's previous vote share. This effect also holds for specific categories of investment expenditures, particularly transport and communication as well as public utilities. The findings are robust across a range of sensitivity checks and suggest that incumbents with weaker prior electoral mandates engage more actively in pre‐electoral investment cycles.

Suggested Citation

  • Monika Banaszewska, 2026. "Does the Popularity of the Incumbent Mayor Matter for Investment Activity? Evidence From Polish Municipalities," Economics and Politics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(2), pages 357-377, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:ecopol:v:38:y:2026:i:2:p:357-377
    DOI: 10.1111/ecpo.70027
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/ecpo.70027
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/ecpo.70027?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:ecopol:v:38:y:2026:i:2:p:357-377. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0954-1985 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.