IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/ecanth/v10y2023i1p112-121.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Distributed fiscal relations and their imaginaries: Metaphors of redistribution and reciprocity in struggles about distributive justice in Austria

Author

Listed:
  • Andreas Streinzer

Abstract

The article analyzes struggles about distributive justice in Austria, one of the wealthiest countries globally, and proposes a reinforced focus on how metaphors of redistribution and reciprocity create fiscal imaginaries. It analyzes how politicians, lobbyists, and activists strategically mobilize these metaphors in corporate and wealth taxation debates. Campaigns against wealth taxation portray wealth taxation as negative reciprocity and a threat to an imagined middle class. Those arguing in favor of them create images of unjustly appropriated value that needs to be redistributed. The article analyzes those shifts between notions of redistribution and reciprocity and the fiscal imaginaries created through these debates. Notably, the article argues for the necessity to embed discursive analysis within an understanding of contemporary capitalisms. It contrasts the fiscal imaginaries with challenges of fiscal relations, most importantly the distributed character of capital accumulation and the dilemma of the tax state, as governments orchestrate accumulation to capture parts of its value generated via taxation.

Suggested Citation

  • Andreas Streinzer, 2023. "Distributed fiscal relations and their imaginaries: Metaphors of redistribution and reciprocity in struggles about distributive justice in Austria," Economic Anthropology, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 10(1), pages 112-121, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:ecanth:v:10:y:2023:i:1:p:112-121
    DOI: 10.1002/sea2.12266
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/sea2.12266
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/sea2.12266?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Matthias Schmidl & Margit Schratzenstaller, 2011. "Steuern auf Vermögen und Vermögenserträge: Probleme und Gestaltungsmöglichkeiten für Österreich," Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft - WuG, Kammer für Arbeiter und Angestellte für Wien, Abteilung Wirtschaftswissenschaft und Statistik, vol. 37(3), pages 403-434.
    2. Zucman, Gabriel & Fagan, Teresa Lavender & Piketty, Thomas, 2016. "The Hidden Wealth of Nations," University of Chicago Press Economics Books, University of Chicago Press, number 9780226422640, September.
    3. Liebig, Stefan & Mau, Steffen, 2005. "Wann ist ein Steuersystem gerecht? Einstellungen zu allgemeinen Prinzipien der Besteuerung und zur Gerechtigkeit der eigenen Steuerlast," Duisburger Beiträge zur soziologischen Forschung 1/2005, University of Duisburg-Essen, Institute of Sociology.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Andreas Fagereng & Luigi Guiso & Davide Malacrino & Luigi Pistaferri, 2020. "Heterogeneity and Persistence in Returns to Wealth," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 88(1), pages 115-170, January.
    2. Katrin Auspurg & Annette Jäckle, 2017. "First Equals Most Important? Order Effects in Vignette-Based Measurement," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 46(3), pages 490-539, August.
    3. Nora Lustig, 2020. "The ``missing rich'' in household surveys: causes and correction approaches," Working Papers 520, ECINEQ, Society for the Study of Economic Inequality.
    4. Dov Fischer & Hershey Friedman, 2021. "Family Business in the #MeToo Era: Lessons from Ruth on Tone at the Top," Humanistic Management Journal, Springer, vol. 6(1), pages 37-55, April.
    5. Ali Ahmed & Chris Jones & Yama Temouri, . "The relationship between MNE tax haven use and FDI into developing economies characterized by capital flight," UNCTAD Transnational Corporations Journal, United Nations Conference on Trade and Development.
    6. Christina Neeß, 2015. "Worauf achten Arbeitgeber im Auswahlprozess von Absolventen wirtschaftswissenschaftlicher Studiengänge? Ergebnisse eines faktoriellen Surveys [What do employers look for during the selection proces," Journal for Labour Market Research, Springer;Institute for Employment Research/ Institut für Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung (IAB), vol. 48(4), pages 305-323, December.
    7. Philipp Gerhartinger, 2013. "Aktuelle Trends in der Besteuerung von Vermögen. Österreich im internationalen Vergleich," Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft - WuG, Kammer für Arbeiter und Angestellte für Wien, Abteilung Wirtschaftswissenschaft und Statistik, vol. 39(2), pages 233-245.
    8. Nora Lustig, 2019. "The “Missing Rich” in Household Surveys: Causes and Correction Approaches," Commitment to Equity (CEQ) Working Paper Series 75, Tulane University, Department of Economics.
    9. Sandra E. Black & Paul J. Devereux & Fanny Landaud & Kjell G. Salvanes, 2022. "The (Un)Importance of Inheritance," CESifo Working Paper Series 9566, CESifo.
    10. Hinton, Jennifer B., 2022. "Limits to Profit? A conceptual framework for understanding profit and sustainability," Working Paper Series 02/2022, Post-Growth Economics Network (PEN).
    11. Sebastian E. Spiegel & Alexandra Kloss, 2017. "Determinants of Tax Fairness Perception and the Role of Self-Interest - Results from Two German Surveys," Eurasian Journal of Economics and Finance, Eurasian Publications, vol. 5(4), pages 50-75.
    12. Margit Schratzenstaller, 2013. "Besteuerung höherer Einkommen und Vermögen: internationale Entwicklungstendenzen, Möglichkeiten und Grenzen," Vierteljahrshefte zur Wirtschaftsforschung / Quarterly Journal of Economic Research, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research, vol. 82(1), pages 13-34.
    13. Dov Fischer & Hershey H. Friedman, 2019. "Tone-at-the-Top Lessons from Abrahamic Justice," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 156(1), pages 209-225, April.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:ecanth:v:10:y:2023:i:1:p:112-121. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=2330-4847 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.