IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/devpol/v44y2026i3ne70069.html

The benefits of US foreign aid in rural US communities: The case of northwestern North Carolina

Author

Listed:
  • Jesse Lutabingwa
  • Renee Scherlen

Abstract

Motivation This study analyses the underexplored domestic benefits of US foreign aid by evaluating the long‐term impacts of two strategic international exchange programmes—the Fulbright Teaching Excellence and Achievement (TEA) Program and the Mandela Washington Fellowship for Young African Leaders—that were implemented over a decade through Appalachian State University in rural northwestern North Carolina. Purpose Most evaluations of US foreign aid focus on external critiques that ignore the positive impacts that programmes can have domestically in the United States. Addressing these literature gaps is crucial in enhancing the efficacy and public understanding of US foreign aid. Approach and Methods The research uses retrospective impact evaluation and mixed methods content analysis. The evaluation fundamentally emphasized causal inference. Although the original programmes focused primarily on international participants, this study used existing data to concurrently explore the broader impacts of these programmes on local communities of the northwestern North Carolina region. Findings The findings identify significant contributions across three domains: educational, cultural, and social. Key findings show that the programmes fostered global awareness, offered professional development opportunities to US participants, and promoted mutual understanding. Policy Implications Ultimately, this research demonstrates the reciprocal value and strategic potential of foreign aid as a domestic development tool in underserved US regions, thereby challenging the prevailing critiques that prioritize foreign over domestic needs. Policy‐makers should, therefore, consider these substantial, multifaceted domestic returns when evaluating the strategic value of international exchange programmes within the US foreign aid portfolio.

Suggested Citation

  • Jesse Lutabingwa & Renee Scherlen, 2026. "The benefits of US foreign aid in rural US communities: The case of northwestern North Carolina," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 44(3), May.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:devpol:v:44:y:2026:i:3:n:e70069
    DOI: 10.1111/dpr.70069
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/dpr.70069
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/dpr.70069?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Macdonald, David, 2025. "Trust in government and American public opinion toward foreign aid," Political Science Research and Methods, Cambridge University Press, vol. 13(2), pages 245-263, April.
    2. Helen Milner & Dustin Tingley, 2013. "The choice for multilateralism: Foreign aid and American foreign policy," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 8(3), pages 313-341, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Michael M. Bechtel & Kenneth F. Scheve & Elisabeth Lieshout, 2022. "Improving public support for climate action through multilateralism," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-9, December.
    2. Bernhard Reinsberg & Martin C. Steinwand, 2025. "Lead or Follow? Participation Decisions in Collective Development Initiatives," Economics and Politics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(2), pages 811-825, July.
    3. Reinsberg,Bernhard Wilfried & Michaelowa,Katharina & Knack,Stephen, 2015. "Which donors, which funds ? the choice of multilateral funds by bilateral donors at the World Bank," Policy Research Working Paper Series 7441, The World Bank.
    4. Danny Kurban & Niklas Potrafke, 2013. "Zum Einfluss von Regierungsideologie in Geberländern auf die Verteilung von Entwicklungshilfe," ifo Schnelldienst, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 66(14), pages 30-34, July.
    5. Kadir Aden & Sadik Aden Dirir, 2025. "Refugee nexus eco-capacity: examining refugee-environment dynamics and sustainable integration pathways in Djibouti," Sustainability Nexus Forum, Springer, vol. 33(1), pages 1-21, December.
    6. Emmanuelle Auriol & Josepa Miquel-Florensa, 2019. "Taxing fragmented aid to improve aid efficiency," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 14(3), pages 453-477, September.
    7. Terrence L. Chapman & Huimin Li, 2023. "Can IOs influence attitudes about regulating “Big Tech”?," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 18(4), pages 725-751, October.
    8. Ziyoda Asatullaeva & Reza Fathollah Zadeh Aghdam & Nisar Ahmad & Laylo Tashpulatova, 2021. "The impact of foreign aid on economic development: A systematic literature review and content analysis of the top 50 most influential papers," Journal of International Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 33(4), pages 717-751, May.
    9. Juan David Gómez-Quintero & Pilar Gargallo Valero & Jesús Miguel Álvarez, 2019. "Who Supports International Development Cooperation in Times of Crisis? Public Opinion in Rural Spain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-17, April.
    10. Inken Borzyskowski & Felicity Vabulas, 2024. "Public support for withdrawal from international organizations: Experimental evidence from the US," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 19(4), pages 809-845, October.
    11. Prather, Lauren, 2024. "Ideology at the Water’s Edge: Explaining Variation in Public Support for Foreign Aid," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    12. Sarah Kreps & Sarah Maxey, 2018. "Mechanisms of Morality," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 62(8), pages 1814-1842, September.
    13. Balázs Szent-Iványi & Bernhard Reinsberg & Simon Lightfoot, 2019. "Small Donors in World Politics: The Role of Trust Funds in the Foreign Aid Policies of Central and Eastern European Donors," The European Journal of Development Research, Palgrave Macmillan;European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI), vol. 31(3), pages 663-683, July.
    14. Axel Dreher & Jenny Simon & Justin Valasek, 2021. "Optimal decision rules in multilateral aid funds," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 16(3), pages 689-719, July.
    15. Dreher, Axel & Simon, Jenny & Valasek, Justin, 2018. "The Political Economy of Multilateral Aid Funds," CEPR Discussion Papers 13297, Centre for Economic Policy Research.
    16. Gorm Rye Olsen, 2022. "Twenty-First Century Military Multilateralism: “Messy” and With Unintended Consequences," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 10(2), pages 15-24.
    17. Axel Dreher & Katharina Michaelowa, 2008. "The political economy of international organizations," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 3(4), pages 331-334, December.
    18. Axel Dreher & Jan-Egbert Sturm & James Raymond Vreeland, 2015. "Politics and IMF Conditionality," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 59(1), pages 120-148, February.
    19. Chi Him Lee & Brian Tse & Nathaniel Lai & William Goggins & Larry Baum & E Anthony S Nelson, 2018. "Hong Kong’s role in global health: Public opinion of official development assistance," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(12), pages 1-13, December.
    20. Marchal, Léa & Naiditch, Claire & Simsek, Betül, 2021. "Managing Migration Flows Through Foreign Aid," ILE Working Paper Series 46, University of Hamburg, Institute of Law and Economics.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:devpol:v:44:y:2026:i:3:n:e70069. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/odioruk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.