IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/deveco/v63y2025i1p9-46.html

Uncovering Xi Jinping's Policy Agenda: Text As Data Approach

Author

Listed:
  • Jaehwan Lim
  • Asei Ito
  • Hongyong Zhang

Abstract

How many agendas has Xi Jinping put forth and promoted since taking office in 2012, and what are the types of agendas? How much of political attention has each agenda received, and how has the allocation of attention changed over time? We utilize a dataset of presidential statements, speeches, and reports from 2012 to 2022 and employed automated text analysis to identify major topics and terms associated with each topic. Our analysis reveals the identification of about 25 distinct policy agendas across diverse policy domains, with remarkable temporal variations between agendas in terms of the amount of leadership attention. Particularly, we find a significant shift in both the substance and relative weight of policy agendas between the first and second terms of Xi's tenure, indicating his adaptation and responses to changing domestic and foreign policy environments.

Suggested Citation

  • Jaehwan Lim & Asei Ito & Hongyong Zhang, 2025. "Uncovering Xi Jinping's Policy Agenda: Text As Data Approach," The Developing Economies, Institute of Developing Economies, vol. 63(1), pages 9-46, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:deveco:v:63:y:2025:i:1:p:9-46
    DOI: 10.1111/deve.12418
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/deve.12418
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/deve.12418?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Joseph D. Piotroski & T. J. Wong & Tianyu Zhang, 2017. "Political Bias in Corporate News: The Role of Conglomeration Reform in China," Journal of Law and Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 60(1), pages 173-207.
    2. Ying, Luwei & Montgomery, Jacob M. & Stewart, Brandon M., 2022. "Topics, Concepts, and Measurement: A Crowdsourced Procedure for Validating Topics as Measures," Political Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 30(4), pages 570-589, October.
    3. Grimmer, Justin & Stewart, Brandon M., 2013. "Text as Data: The Promise and Pitfalls of Automatic Content Analysis Methods for Political Texts," Political Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 21(3), pages 267-297, July.
    4. Xu, Gang & Yano, Go, 2017. "How does anti-corruption affect corporate innovation? Evidence from recent anti-corruption efforts in China," Journal of Comparative Economics, Elsevier, vol. 45(3), pages 498-519.
    5. Aidt, Toke S. & Hillman, Arye L. & Qijun, LIU, 2020. "Who takes bribes and how much? Evidence from the China Corruption Conviction Databank," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 133(C).
    6. Lucas, Christopher & Nielsen, Richard A. & Roberts, Margaret E. & Stewart, Brandon M. & Storer, Alex & Tingley, Dustin, 2015. "Computer-Assisted Text Analysis for Comparative Politics," Political Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 23(2), pages 254-277, April.
    7. Xiaolei Qin & Jing Huang, 2024. "Policy punctuations and agenda diversity in China: a national level analysis from 1980 to 2019," Policy Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 45(1), pages 21-41, January.
    8. Jidong Chen & Jennifer Pan & Yiqing Xu, 2016. "Sources of Authoritarian Responsiveness: A Field Experiment in China," American Journal of Political Science, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 60(2), pages 383-400, April.
    9. Wang, Yuhua & Dickson, Bruce J., 2022. "How corruption investigations undermine regime support: evidence from China," Political Science Research and Methods, Cambridge University Press, vol. 10(1), pages 33-48, January.
    10. Kevin M. Quinn & Burt L. Monroe & Michael Colaresi & Michael H. Crespin & Dragomir R. Radev, 2010. "How to Analyze Political Attention with Minimal Assumptions and Costs," American Journal of Political Science, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 54(1), pages 209-228, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Tao Ren, 2026. "Transforming the Northwest frontier: development discourse in Republican China through computational analysis of the historical press," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 13(1), pages 1-17, December.
    2. Hirokazu Kikuchi & Keiichi Kubo, 2025. "Introduction to the Special Issue on “Text as Data in the Study of Politics in Developing Countries”," The Developing Economies, Institute of Developing Economies, vol. 63(1), pages 3-8, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jaehwan LIM & Asei ITO & Hongyong ZHANG, 2023. "Policy Agenda and Trajectory of the Xi Jinping Administration: Textual Evidence from 2012 to 2022," Policy Discussion Papers 23008, Research Institute of Economy, Trade and Industry (RIETI).
    2. Dehler-Holland, Joris & Schumacher, Kira & Fichtner, Wolf, 2021. "Topic Modeling Uncovers Shifts in Media Framing of the German Renewable Energy Act," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 2(1).
    3. Mohamed M. Mostafa, 2023. "A one-hundred-year structural topic modeling analysis of the knowledge structure of international management research," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 57(4), pages 3905-3935, August.
    4. repec:osf:socarx:yfzsh_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. Dehler-Holland, Joris & Okoh, Marvin & Keles, Dogan, 2022. "Assessing technology legitimacy with topic models and sentiment analysis – The case of wind power in Germany," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).
    6. repec:osf:osfxxx:ghxj8_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    7. Greene, Zac & Ceron, Andrea & Schumacher, Gijs & Fazekas, Zoltan, 2016. "The Nuts and Bolts of Automated Text Analysis. Comparing Different Document Pre-Processing Techniques in Four Countries," OSF Preprints ghxj8, Center for Open Science.
    8. Karell, Daniel & Freedman, Michael Raphael, 2019. "Rhetorics of Radicalism," SocArXiv yfzsh, Center for Open Science.
    9. Sara Kahn-Nisser, 2019. "When the targets are members and donors: Analyzing inter-governmental organizations’ human rights shaming," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 14(3), pages 431-451, September.
    10. Valentina A. Bali & Devin Higgins, 2023. "More than Meets the Eye? Using Text Analytic Techniques to Unpack School Mission Statements," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(4), pages 21582440231, December.
    11. Michal Ovádek & Nicolas Lampach & Arthur Dyevre, 2020. "What’s the talk in Brussels? Leveraging daily news coverage to measure issue attention in the European Union," European Union Politics, , vol. 21(2), pages 204-232, June.
    12. Maschke, Andreas, 2024. "Talking exports: The representation of Germany's current account in newspaper media," MPIfG Discussion Paper 24/1, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies.
    13. Cheyenne A. Black, 2026. "Astro-nots Bezos, Branson, and Musk compared to NASA: promises and pitfalls of using sentiment analysis to assess differences between commercial, government, and public–private space missions," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 60(1), pages 355-381, February.
    14. Zhang, Han, 2021. "How Using Machine Learning Classification as a Variable in Regression Leads to Attenuation Bias and What to Do About It," SocArXiv 453jk, Center for Open Science.
    15. Sebők, Miklós & Proksch, Sven-Oliver & Rauh, Christian & Visnovitz, Péter & Balázs, Gergő & Schwalbach, Jan, 2025. "Comparative European legislative research in the age of large-scale computational text analysis: A review article," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 46(1), pages 18-39.
    16. Ferrara, Federico M. & Masciandaro, Donato & Moschella, Manuela & Romelli, Davide, 2022. "Political voice on monetary policy: Evidence from the parliamentary hearings of the European Central Bank," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    17. Yang Bao & Anindya Datta, 2014. "Simultaneously Discovering and Quantifying Risk Types from Textual Risk Disclosures," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 60(6), pages 1371-1391, June.
    18. Chen, Yuyu & Fang, Ming & Wang, Xuan, 2026. "(Mis)use of power in the ivory tower: Evidence from deans in Chinese universities," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 242(C).
    19. Anselm Hager & Hanno Hilbig, 2020. "Does Public Opinion Affect Political Speech?," American Journal of Political Science, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 64(4), pages 921-937, October.
    20. Xu, Zhengang, 2025. "Assessing the efficacy of China's anti-corruption drive: Insights from consumer expenditure patterns," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    21. Carlos Mendez & Fernando Mendez & Vasiliki Triga & Juan Miguel Carrascosa, 2020. "EU Cohesion Policy under the Media Spotlight: Exploring Territorial and Temporal Patterns in News Coverage and Tone," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 58(4), pages 1034-1055, July.
    22. Ulrich Fritsche & Johannes Puckelwald, 2018. "Deciphering Professional Forecasters’ Stories - Analyzing a Corpus of Textual Predictions for the German Economy," Macroeconomics and Finance Series 201804, University of Hamburg, Department of Socioeconomics.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:deveco:v:63:y:2025:i:1:p:9-46. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/idegvjp.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.