IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/bstrat/v35y2026i3p4256-4276.html

Nature at Risk, Finance at Stake: A Systematic Literature Review of Biodiversity Risk in Finance Research

Author

Listed:
  • Thang Ngoc Dang
  • Monomita Nandy
  • Suman Lodh
  • Khaled Hussainey

Abstract

Biodiversity‐related financial risk is increasingly recognized not only as a market concern but as an ethical and systemic imperative for businesses and financial institutions. This systematic literature review synthesizes 103 peer‐reviewed studies to examine how biodiversity risk is conceptualized, measured, and integrated within financial research. While awareness of biodiversity as a systemic financial risk is expanding, the field remains theoretically fragmented and methodologically uneven. Four dominant themes emerge: financial materiality, visibility and recognition, governance and accountability, and levels of analysis. Building on these findings, the review introduces an eco‐financial transmission framework that connects biodiversity loss to financial exposure through valuation, governance, and disclosure channels. It further underscores the moral responsibility of financial actors to embed biodiversity into investment practices, ESG strategies, and regulatory design. By integrating ecological economics with ethical finance, this review advances a conceptual foundation for a financial system that not only mitigates biodiversity risk but also supports long‐term ecological resilience.

Suggested Citation

  • Thang Ngoc Dang & Monomita Nandy & Suman Lodh & Khaled Hussainey, 2026. "Nature at Risk, Finance at Stake: A Systematic Literature Review of Biodiversity Risk in Finance Research," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 35(3), pages 4256-4276, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:35:y:2026:i:3:p:4256-4276
    DOI: 10.1002/bse.70398
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.70398
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/bse.70398?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:35:y:2026:i:3:p:4256-4276. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1099-0836 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.