IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/bstrat/v34y2025i3p2813-2834.html

Methods for Defining Climate Change Mitigation Strategies at Organisational Level Review and Outlook

Author

Listed:
  • Nicolas Desmoitier
  • Jean Roman
  • Benoit Hilloulin
  • Emmanuel Rozière
  • Alexis Laurent

Abstract

The private sector has a pivotal role in contributing to the objective of the Paris Agreement and its 1.5° target. However, there is a lack of a comprehensive framework to define and implement climate change mitigation strategies in organisations. The current study aims to fill this gap by performing a critical review of existing schemes that can make a partial contribution to the definition of such strategies. We found 25 schemes used by private sector or studied in the literature by international NGOs and academic searcher and evaluated them based on 15 criteria developed for this study in order to cover key components of an effective framework for CCMS in organisations. No scheme fulfils all the criteria, but significant differences are observed between them, ranging from 0% to 80% of the criteria met. Based on this analysis, we propose a first harmonized five‐step iterative framework to define organisational climate change mitigation strategies. Eventually, the results of the schemes review and the framework proposal draw up a research agenda to derive robust, credible and operational climate strategies at organizational levels.

Suggested Citation

  • Nicolas Desmoitier & Jean Roman & Benoit Hilloulin & Emmanuel Rozière & Alexis Laurent, 2025. "Methods for Defining Climate Change Mitigation Strategies at Organisational Level Review and Outlook," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(3), pages 2813-2834, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:34:y:2025:i:3:p:2813-2834
    DOI: 10.1002/bse.4130
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.4130
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/bse.4130?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rekker, Saphira & Ives, Matthew & Wade, Belinda & Greig, Chris & Webb, Lachlan, 2021. "The Paris-compliant company: Measuring transition performance using a strict science-based approach," INET Oxford Working Papers 2021-03, Institute for New Economic Thinking at the Oxford Martin School, University of Oxford, revised Oct 2021.
    2. S. Rekker & M. C. Ives & B. Wade & L. Webb & C. Greig, 2022. "Measuring corporate Paris Compliance using a strict science-based approach," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-11, December.
    3. Anders Bjørn & H. Damon Matthews & Maida Hadziosmanovic & Nicolas Desmoitier & Amr Addas & Shannon M. Lloyd, 2023. "Increased transparency is needed for corporate science-based targets to be effective," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 13(8), pages 756-759, August.
    4. Sander Chan & Paula Ellinger & Oscar Widerberg, 2018. "Exploring national and regional orchestration of non-state action for a," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 18(1), pages 135-152, February.
    5. Franck Aggeri & Mélodie Cartel, 2017. "Entreprises et changement climatique," Grenoble Ecole de Management (Post-Print) hal-04090138, HAL.
    6. Franck Aggeri & Mélodie Cartel, 2017. "Le changement climatique et les entreprises : enjeux, espaces d’action, régulations internationales," Post-Print hal-01609184, HAL.
    7. Jannik Giesekam & Jonathan Norman & Alice Garvey & Sam Betts-Davies, 2021. "Science-Based Targets: On Target?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-20, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Clara Privato & Matthew P. Johnson & Timo Busch, 2024. "Raising the bar: What determines the ambition level of corporate climate targets?," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 177(9), pages 1-24, September.
    2. Chaaben, Nahla & Saida, Imen & Helali, Kamel, 2026. "Analyzing the non-linear impact of carbon dioxide emissions on renewable energy in Commonwealth nations," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 227(C).
    3. Hamada Saleh & Stefano Battiston & Irene Monasterolo & Thibaud Barreau & Peter Tankov, 2026. "Estimating firms' emissions from asset level data helps revealing (mis)alignment to net zero targets," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 17(1), pages 1-12, December.
    4. Anthony Vandersteene, 2023. "Do Belgian SME Managers Put Their Money Where Their Mouth Is Regarding Climate Change?," Economic, Social and Environmental Sustainability; The Role of Technology and Political Dialogue,, ToKnowPress.
    5. Anthony Vandersteene, 2025. "Environmental Concern of Owner‐Managers and Environmental Practices of SMEs: A Typology Considering Size and Sector‐Specific Environmental Regulations," Business Ethics, the Environment & Responsibility, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 34(4), pages 2356-2372, October.
    6. Gottlieb, Uliana & Edenbrandt, Anna Kristina, 2024. "Impact investment preferences for carbon target difficulty, progress and science-based approval," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, Elsevier, vol. 43(C).
    7. Joyeeta Gupta & Aarti Gupta & Courtney Vegelin, 2022. "Equity, justice and the SDGs: lessons learnt from two decades of INEA scholarship," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 22(2), pages 393-409, June.
    8. Agni Kalfagianni & Oran R. Young, 2022. "The politics of multilateral environmental agreements lessons from 20 years of INEA," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 22(2), pages 245-262, June.
    9. Mia Heide & Mickey Gjerris, 2024. "Embedded but overlooked values: Ethical aspects of absolute environmental sustainability assessments," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 28(3), pages 386-396, June.
    10. David Bendig & Andreas Wagner & Kevin Lau, 2023. "Does it pay to be science‐based green? The impact of science‐based emission‐reduction targets on corporate financial performance," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 27(1), pages 125-140, February.
    11. Frans Sengers & Bruno Turnheim & Frans Berkhout, 2021. "Beyond experiments: Embedding outcomes in climate governance," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 39(6), pages 1148-1171, September.
    12. Maia, Rodrigo Gomes Távora & Garcia, Katia Cristina, 2023. "What they say, what they do and how they do it: An evaluation of the energy transition and GHG emissions of electricity companies," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    13. Iker Larrea & Jose Manuel Correa & Rafaella López & Lidia Giménez & Kepa Solaun, 2022. "A Multicriteria Methodology to Evaluate Climate Neutrality Claims—A Case Study with Spanish Firms," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-13, April.
    14. Maida Hadziosmanovic & Shannon M. Lloyd & Anders Bjørn & Raymond L. Paquin & Nadine Mengis & H. Damon Matthews, 2022. "Using cumulative carbon budgets and corporate carbon disclosure to inform ambitious corporate emissions targets and long‐term mitigation pathways," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 26(5), pages 1747-1759, October.
    15. Sander Chan & Thomas Hale & Andrew Deneault & Manish Shrivastava & Kennedy Mbeva & Victoria Chengo & Joanes Atela, 2022. "Assessing the effectiveness of orchestrated climate action from five years of summits," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 12(7), pages 628-633, July.
    16. Benjamin M. Abraham, 2021. "Ideology and non-state climate action: partnering and design of REDD+ projects," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 21(4), pages 669-690, December.
    17. Cameron Hepburn & Matthew C Ives & Sam Loni & Penny Mealy & Pete Barbrook-Johnson & J Doyne Farmer & Nicholas Stern & Joseph Stiglitz, 2025. "Economic models and frameworks to guide climate policy," Oxford Review of Economic Policy, Oxford University Press and Oxford Review of Economic Policy Limited, vol. 41(2), pages 616-652.
    18. Sander Chan & Idil Boran & Harro van Asselt & Paula Ellinger & Miriam Garcia & Thomas Hale & Lukas Hermwille & Kennedy Liti Mbeva & Ayşem Mert & Charles B. Roger & Amy Weinfurter & Oscar Widerberg & P, 2021. "Climate Ambition and Sustainable Development for a New Decade: A Catalytic Framework," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 12(3), pages 245-259, May.
    19. Felix Ekardt & Jutta Wieding & Anika Zorn, 2018. "Paris Agreement, Precautionary Principle and Human Rights: Zero Emissions in Two Decades?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-15, August.
    20. Timo Busch & Charles H. Cho & Andreas G. F. Hoepner & Giovanna Michelon & Joeri Rogelj, 2023. "Corporate Greenhouse Gas Emissions’ Data and the Urgent Need for a Science-Led Just Transition: Introduction to a Thematic Symposium," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 182(4), pages 897-901, February.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:34:y:2025:i:3:p:2813-2834. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1099-0836 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.