IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/biomet/v64y2008i4p1256-1262.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Statistical Power and Sample Size Requirements for Three Level Hierarchical Cluster Randomized Trials

Author

Listed:
  • Moonseong Heo
  • Andrew C. Leon

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Moonseong Heo & Andrew C. Leon, 2008. "Statistical Power and Sample Size Requirements for Three Level Hierarchical Cluster Randomized Trials," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 64(4), pages 1256-1262, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:biomet:v:64:y:2008:i:4:p:1256-1262
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1111/j.1541-0420.2008.00993.x
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Donner, A. & Klar, N., 2004. "Pitfalls of and Controversies in Cluster Randomization Trials," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 94(3), pages 416-422.
    2. Anindya Roy & Dulal K. Bhaumik & Subhash Aryal & Robert D. Gibbons, 2007. "Sample Size Determination for Hierarchical Longitudinal Designs with Differential Attrition Rates," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 63(3), pages 699-707, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Steven Teerenstra & Bing Lu & John S. Preisser & Theo van Achterberg & George F. Borm, 2010. "Sample Size Considerations for GEE Analyses of Three-Level Cluster Randomized Trials," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 66(4), pages 1230-1237, December.
    2. Satoshi Usami, 2017. "Generalized SAMPLE SIZE Determination Formulas for Investigating Contextual Effects by a Three-Level Random Intercept Model," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 82(1), pages 133-157, March.
    3. Kari Tokola & Andreas Lundell & Jaakko Nevalainen & Hannu Oja, 2014. "Design and cost optimization for hierarchical data," Statistica Neerlandica, Netherlands Society for Statistics and Operations Research, vol. 68(2), pages 130-148, May.
    4. Kendra Davis‐Plourde & Monica Taljaard & Fan Li, 2023. "Sample size considerations for stepped wedge designs with subclusters," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 79(1), pages 98-112, March.
    5. Heo, Moonseong & Xue, Xiaonan & Kim, Mimi Y., 2013. "Sample size requirements to detect an intervention by time interaction in longitudinal cluster randomized clinical trials with random slopes," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 169-178.
    6. Tokola, K. & Larocque, D. & Nevalainen, J. & Oja, H., 2011. "Power, sample size and sampling costs for clustered data," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 81(7), pages 852-860, July.
    7. Mirjam Moerbeek & Maryam Safarkhani, 2018. "The Design of Cluster Randomized Trials With Random Cross-Classifications," Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, , vol. 43(2), pages 159-181, April.
    8. S.P. Singh & S. Mukhopadhyay & A. Roy, 2015. "Comparison of three-level cluster randomized trials using quantile dispersion graphs," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 42(8), pages 1792-1812, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Siyun Yang & Mirjam Moerbeek & Monica Taljaard & Fan Li, 2023. "Power analysis for cluster randomized trials with continuous coprimary endpoints," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 79(2), pages 1293-1305, June.
    2. Sophie Song and Katsushi S. Imai, 2018. "Does the Hunger Safety Net Programme Reduce Multidimensional Poverty? Evidence from Kenya," OPHI Working Papers ophiwp124.pdf, Queen Elizabeth House, University of Oxford.
    3. Benjamin F. Arnold & Francois Rerolle & Christine Tedijanto & Sammy M. Njenga & Mahbubur Rahman & Ayse Ercumen & Andrew Mertens & Amy J. Pickering & Audrie Lin & Charles D. Arnold & Kishor Das & Chris, 2024. "Geographic pair matching in large-scale cluster randomized trials," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-15, December.
    4. Anup Amatya & Dulal K. Bhaumik, 2018. "Sample size determination for multilevel hierarchical designs using generalized linear mixed models," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 74(2), pages 673-684, June.
    5. Stefanie Behncke, 2012. "How Do Shocks to Non-Cognitive Skills Affect Test Scores?," Annals of Economics and Statistics, GENES, issue 107-108, pages 155-173.
    6. Vivek F. Farias & Andrew A. Li & Tianyi Peng & Andrew Zheng, 2022. "Markovian Interference in Experiments," Papers 2206.02371, arXiv.org, revised Jun 2022.
    7. Keenan A. Pituch & Laura M. Stapleton, 2012. "Distinguishing Between Cross- and Cluster-Level Mediation Processes in the Cluster Randomized Trial," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 41(4), pages 630-670, November.
    8. Mira Bierbaum & Eleonora E M Nillesen, 2021. "Sustaining the integrity of the threatened self: A cluster-randomised trial among social assistance applicants in the Netherlands," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(6), pages 1-21, June.
    9. Heo, Moonseong & Xue, Xiaonan & Kim, Mimi Y., 2013. "Sample size requirements to detect an intervention by time interaction in longitudinal cluster randomized clinical trials with random slopes," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 169-178.
    10. Satoshi Usami, 2017. "Generalized SAMPLE SIZE Determination Formulas for Investigating Contextual Effects by a Three-Level Random Intercept Model," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 82(1), pages 133-157, March.
    11. William Rhodes, 2014. "Pairwise Cluster Randomization," Evaluation Review, , vol. 38(3), pages 217-250, June.
    12. Hussein R. Al-Khalidi & Yili Hong & Thomas R. Fleming & Terry M. Therneau, 2011. "Insights on the Robust Variance Estimator under Recurrent-Events Model," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 67(4), pages 1564-1572, December.
    13. Frédéric Douville & Gaston Godin & France Légaré & Marc Germain, 2014. "Implementation Intentions as a Strategy to Increase the Notification Rate of Potential Ocular Tissue Donors by Nurses: A Clustered Randomized Trial in Hospital Settings," Nursing Research and Practice, Hindawi, vol. 2014, pages 1-7, July.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:biomet:v:64:y:2008:i:4:p:1256-1262. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0006-341X .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.