IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/ausecr/v59y2026i1p105-108.html

Rethinking Healthcare Co‐Payments to Improve Efficiency and Equity

Author

Listed:
  • Kees van Gool
  • Philip Haywood
  • Jane Hall

Abstract

Australia's healthcare system relies heavily on patient co‐payments, which account for around 16% of national health expenditure. Although this percentage is in line with the OECD average, the design of co‐payments is a major source of inequity and inefficiency. Current arrangements contribute to pro‐rich utilisation of specialist care, regressivity in household financing, geographic variation in access and distorted incentives that discourage efficient care. These problems will be amplified by demographic ageing and rising inequality. This opinion piece synthesises the empirical evidence on the consequences of Australia's current co‐payment structure and proposes reforms to improve consistency and predictability of financial signals across programmes as well as incorporate notions of capacity to pay. These reforms aim to reduce the harm imposed by current co‐payments and deliver a more equitable and efficient health system.

Suggested Citation

  • Kees van Gool & Philip Haywood & Jane Hall, 2026. "Rethinking Healthcare Co‐Payments to Improve Efficiency and Equity," Australian Economic Review, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research, vol. 59(1), pages 105-108, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:ausecr:v:59:y:2026:i:1:p:105-108
    DOI: 10.1111/1467-8462.70044
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8462.70044
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/1467-8462.70044?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:ausecr:v:59:y:2026:i:1:p:105-108. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/mimelau.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.