IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/ausact/v16y2006i39p49-59.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Over-Complexity in Accounting Standards and the Emerging Duopoly of US GAAP AND IFRS

Author

Listed:
  • STEPHEN HASWELL

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Stephen Haswell, 2006. "Over-Complexity in Accounting Standards and the Emerging Duopoly of US GAAP AND IFRS," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 16(39), pages 49-59, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:ausact:v:16:y:2006:i:39:p:49-59
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1111/j.1835-2561.2006.tb00359.x
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Willmott, Hugh, 1986. "Organising the profession: A theoretical and historical examination of the development of the major accountancy bodies in the U.K," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 11(6), pages 555-580, October.
    2. Fogarty, Timothy J., 1992. "Financial accounting standard setting as an institutionalized action field: Constraints, opportunities and dilemmas," Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, Elsevier, vol. 11(4), pages 331-355.
    3. David Alexander, 1999. "A benchmark for the adequacy of published financial statements," Accounting and Business Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(3), pages 239-253.
    4. Sunder, Shyam, 2002. "Regulatory competition for low cost-of-capital accounting rules," Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, Elsevier, vol. 21(2), pages 147-149.
    5. Stephen Haswell & Jill Mckinnon, 2003. "IASB Standards for Australia by 2005: Catapult or Trojan Horse?," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 13(29), pages 8-16, March.
    6. Benston, George J. & Hartgraves, Al L., 2002. "Enron: what happened and what we can learn from it," Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, Elsevier, vol. 21(2), pages 105-127.
    7. Bealing, William Jr & Dirsmith, Mark W. & Fogarty, Timothy, 1996. "Early regulatory actions by the SEC: An institutional theory perspective on the dramaturgy of political exchanges," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 21(4), pages 317-338, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Stephen Haswell & Ian Langfield-Smith, 2008. "Fifty-Seven Serious Defects in ‘Australian’ IFRS," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 18(1), pages 46-62, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Brendan O'Connell & Laurie Webb & Henry R. Schwarzbach, 2005. "Batten Down The Hatches! U. S. Accounting Scandals and Lessons for Australia," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 15(36), pages 52-67, July.
    2. Napier, Christopher J., 2006. "Accounts of change: 30 years of historical accounting research," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 31(4-5), pages 445-507.
    3. Richard Lane & Brendan T. O'Connell, 2009. "The changing face of regulators' investigations into financial statement fraud," Accounting Research Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 22(2), pages 118-143, September.
    4. Funnell, Warwick & Wade, Margaret, 2012. "Negotiating the credibility of performance auditing," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 23(6), pages 434-450.
    5. Doadrio, Leopoldo & Alvarado, María & Carrera, Nieves, 2015. "Reforma de la normativa contable española: análisis de su entramado institucional," Revista de Contabilidad - Spanish Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 18(2), pages 200-216.
    6. Mataira, Kelvin & Van Peursem, Karen A., 2010. "An examination of disciplinary culture: Two professional accounting associations in New Zealand," Accounting forum, Elsevier, vol. 34(2), pages 109-122.
    7. Elbannan, Mohamed & McKinley, William, 2006. "A theory of the corporate decision to resist FASB standards: An organization theory perspective," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 31(7), pages 601-622, October.
    8. Churyk, Natalie Tatiana & Stenka, Renata, 2014. "Accounting for complex investment transactions," Journal of Accounting Education, Elsevier, vol. 32(4), pages 58-70.
    9. Everett, Jeff & Shiraz Rahaman, Abu & Neu, Dean & Saxton, Gregory, 2024. "Letters to the editor, institutional experimentation, and the public accounting professional," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    10. repec:dau:papers:123456789/3505 is not listed on IDEAS
    11. Shyam Sunder, 2003. "Rethinking the Structure of Accounting and Auditing," Yale School of Management Working Papers ysm382, Yale School of Management.
    12. Wally Smieliauskas & Kathryn Bewley & Ulfert Gronewold & Ulrich Menzefricke, 2018. "Misleading Forecasts in Accounting Estimates: A Form of Ethical Blindness in Accounting Standards?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 152(2), pages 437-457, October.
    13. Francesco De Luca & Jenice Prather-Kinsey, 2018. "Legitimacy theory may explain the failure of global adoption of IFRS: the case of Europe and the U.S," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 22(3), pages 501-534, September.
    14. Keryn Chalmers & Greg Clinch & Jayne M Godfrey, 2011. "Changes in value relevance of accounting information upon IFRS adoption: Evidence from Australia," Australian Journal of Management, Australian School of Business, vol. 36(2), pages 151-173, August.
    15. Kaouthar Lajili, 2009. "Corporate Risk Disclosure and Corporate Governance," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 2(1), pages 1-24, December.
    16. Mary Canning & Brendan O'Dwyer, 2006. "The influence of the “organisation” on the logics of action-pervading disciplinary decision making: The case of the Institute of Chartered Accountants in Ireland (ICAI)," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing, vol. 19(1), pages 17-46, January.
    17. Jeanjean, Thomas & Stolowy, Hervé, 2009. "Determinants of board members' financial expertise -- Empirical evidence from France," The International Journal of Accounting, Elsevier, vol. 44(4), pages 378-402, December.
    18. repec:dau:papers:123456789/3499 is not listed on IDEAS
    19. Bhimani, Alnoor & Dai, Narisa Tianjing & Sivabalan, Prabhu & Tang, Guliang, 2017. "How do enterprises respond to a managerial accounting performance measure mandated by the state?," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 83687, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    20. Wally Smieliauskas, 2008. "A Framework for Identifying (and Avoiding) Fraudulent Financial Reporting," Accounting Perspectives, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 7(3), pages 189-226, August.
    21. Hottegindre, Géraldine & Loison, Marie-Claire & Belze, Loïc, 2024. "Dynamics of influence within the audit regulatory space: Role-playing and the rise of cynicism," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 100(C).
    22. Nurunnabi, Mohammad, 2014. "‘Does accounting regulation matter?’: An experience of international financial reporting standards implementation in an emerging country," Research in Accounting Regulation, Elsevier, vol. 26(2), pages 230-238.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:ausact:v:16:y:2006:i:39:p:49-59. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=1035-6908 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.