IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/ajecsc/v69y2010i1p398-430.html

Thomas Hobbes's Influence on David Hume: The Emergence of a Public Choice Tradition

Author

Listed:
  • Laurence S. Moss

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Laurence S. Moss, 2010. "Thomas Hobbes's Influence on David Hume: The Emergence of a Public Choice Tradition," American Journal of Economics and Sociology, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 69(1), pages 398-430, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:ajecsc:v:69:y:2010:i:1:p:398-430
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1536-7150.2009.00685.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1536-7150.2009.00685.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1536-7150.2009.00685.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Diamond, Peter & Rothschild, Michael (ed.), 1978. "Uncertainty in Economics," Elsevier Monographs, Elsevier, edition 1, number 9780122148507.
    2. Laurence S. Moss, 1977. "Some Public-Choice Aspects of Hobbes's Political Thought," History of Political Economy, Duke University Press, vol. 9(2), pages 256-272, Summer.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Olli Palm'en, 2022. "Macroeconomic Effect of Uncertainty and Financial Shocks: a non-Gaussian VAR approach," Papers 2202.10834, arXiv.org.
    2. Georges Dionne & Scott Harrington, 2017. "Insurance and Insurance Markets," Working Papers 17-2, HEC Montreal, Canada Research Chair in Risk Management.
    3. Stamm, Andreas & Dietrich, Luise & Harling, Heike & Häußler, Laura & Münch, Florian & Preiß, Jana & Siebert, Jan, 2019. "Sustainable public procurement as a tool to foster sustainable development in Costa Rica: Challenges and recommendations for policy implementation," IDOS Studies, German Institute of Development and Sustainability (IDOS), volume 100, number 100, January.
    4. Fatima, Samar & Desouza, Kevin C. & Denford, James S. & Dawson, Gregory S., 2021. "What explains governments interest in artificial intelligence? A signaling theory approach," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 238-254.
    5. Grant Fleming & Zhangxin (Frank) Liu & David Merrett & Simon Ville, 2021. "Underpricing in a developing capital market: Australian equity issuances, 1920–39†," Economic History Review, Economic History Society, vol. 74(3), pages 831-855, August.
    6. Abdui Rahim Al-Saati, 2003. "The Permissible Gharar (Risk) in Classical Islamic Jurisprudence الغرر المسموح به في الشريعة الإسلامية," Journal of King Abdulaziz University: Islamic Economics, King Abdulaziz University, Islamic Economics Institute., vol. 16(2), pages 3-19, January.
    7. Jean-Philippe Chancelier & Michel Lara & André Palma, 2009. "Risk aversion in expected intertemporal discounted utilities bandit problems," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 67(4), pages 433-440, October.
    8. Mengyuan Cheng & Guoliang Liu & Yongshun Xu & Ming Chi, 2021. "Enhancing Trust Between PPP Partners: The Role of Contractual Functions and Information Transparency," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(3), pages 21582440211, August.
    9. Mohammadhosein Bahmanpour-Khalesi & Mohammadjavad Sharifzadeh, 2024. "Public Finance or Public Choice? Scholastic Political Economy as an Essentialist Synthesis," Post-Print hal-04614845, HAL.
    10. Marcel Boyer & Georges Dionne, 1983. "Riscophobie et étalement à moyenne constante : analyse et applications," L'Actualité Economique, Société Canadienne de Science Economique, vol. 59(2), pages 208-229.
    11. Karni, Edi, 1980. "Risk Aversion in the State Preference Approach and in the Expected Utility Maximizing Approach to Decision Making Under Uncertainty," Foerder Institute for Economic Research Working Papers 275324, Tel-Aviv University > Foerder Institute for Economic Research.
    12. Kristle R. Cortes & Andrew Glover & Murat Tasci, 2022. "The Unintended Consequences of Employer Credit Check Bans for Labor Markets," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 104(5), pages 997-1009, December.
    13. Maxime Menuet & Patrick Villieu, 2021. "Reputation and the “need for enemies”," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 72(4), pages 1049-1089, November.
    14. Johannes Gettinger & Michael Filzmoser & Sabine T. Koeszegi, 2016. "Why can’t we settle again? Analysis of factors that influence agreement prospects in the post-settlement phase," Journal of Business Economics, Springer, vol. 86(4), pages 413-440, May.
    15. Vincent Martinet & Pedro Gajardo & Michel Lara, 2024. "Bargaining on monotonic social choice environments," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 96(2), pages 209-238, March.
    16. Laurence S. Moss, 2010. "Finding New Wine in Old Bottles: What Historians Must Do When Leontief Coefficients Are No Longer the Designated Drivers of Economics," American Journal of Economics and Sociology, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 69(1), pages 431-460, January.
    17. Sadia Hussain & Hamna Ahmed, 2019. "The role of bundling in promoting sustainability of health insurance: evidence from Pakistan," The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance - Issues and Practice, Palgrave Macmillan;The Geneva Association, vol. 44(3), pages 503-526, July.
    18. Beggs, A.W., 2007. "Large deviations and equilibrium selection in large populations," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 132(1), pages 383-410, January.
    19. Ullah, Subhan & Attah-Boakye, Rexford & Adams, Kweku & Zaefarian, Ghasem, 2022. "Assessing the influence of celebrity and government endorsements on bitcoin’s price volatility," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 228-239.
    20. Samir Jeddi & Dominic Lencz & Theresa Wildgrube, 2021. "Complementing carbon prices with Carbon Contracts for Difference in the presence of risk - When is it beneficial and when not?," EWI Working Papers 2021-9, Energiewirtschaftliches Institut an der Universitaet zu Koeln (EWI).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:ajecsc:v:69:y:2010:i:1:p:398-430. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0002-9246 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.