IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/ajecsc/v67y2008i5p827-857.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Solving the “Lachmann Problem”: Orientation, Individualism, and the Causal Explanation of Socioeconomic Order

Author

Listed:
  • Paul Lewis

Abstract

This article examines the question of whether social institutions should be treated as possessing the sui generis causal power to influence people's actions. It does so by means of a case study of the work of the Austrian economist Ludwig Lachmann. Lachmann's account of how social institutions facilitate intentional human agency in the face of uncertainty contains significant ambiguities and tensions, stemming from his reluctance to acknowledge the causal efficacy of social institutions. The conceptual resources required to overcome these problems are to be found in realist social philosophy and social theory. The proposed resolution comes at a price, however, for it calls into question Lachmann's self‐avowed commitment to methodological individualism.

Suggested Citation

  • Paul Lewis, 2008. "Solving the “Lachmann Problem”: Orientation, Individualism, and the Causal Explanation of Socioeconomic Order," American Journal of Economics and Sociology, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 67(5), pages 827-857, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:ajecsc:v:67:y:2008:i:5:p:827-857
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1536-7150.2008.00599.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1536-7150.2008.00599.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1536-7150.2008.00599.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Paul Lewis, 2005. "Structure, agency and causality in post-revival Austrian economics: tensions and resolutions," Review of Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(2), pages 291-316.
    2. Roger Koppl, 2002. "Big Players and the Economic Theory of Expectations," Palgrave Macmillan Books, Palgrave Macmillan, number 978-0-230-62924-0, December.
    3. Fleetwood, Steve, 1996. "Order without Equilibrium: A Critical Realist Interpretation of Hayek's Notion of Spontaneous Order," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Oxford University Press, vol. 20(6), pages 729-747, November.
    4. Steve Fleetwood, 2001. "Causal Laws, Functional Relations and Tendencies," Review of Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(2), pages 201-220.
    5. Lachmann, Ludwig M, 1976. "From Mises to Shackle: An Essay on Austrian Economics and the Kaleidic Society," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 14(1), pages 54-62, March.
    6. Robin Cowan & Mario J. Rizzo, 1996. "The Genetic‐Causal Tradition and Modern Economic Theory," Kyklos, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 49(3), pages 273-317, August.
    7. Jörg Bibow & Paul Lewis & Jochen Runde, 2005. "Uncertainty, Conventional Behavior, and Economic Sociology," American Journal of Economics and Sociology, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 64(2), pages 507-532, April.
    8. Zafirovski, Milan, 2002. "Paths of the Weberian-Austrian Interconnection," The Review of Austrian Economics, Springer;Society for the Development of Austrian Economics, vol. 15(1), pages 35-59, January.
    9. David Dequech, 2004. "Uncertainty: individuals, institutions and technology," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Oxford University Press, vol. 28(3), pages 365-378, May.
    10. Tony Lawson, 1988. "Probability and Uncertainty in Economic Analysis," Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 11(1), pages 38-65, September.
    11. David Dequech, 2003. "Uncertainty and Economic Sociology:," American Journal of Economics and Sociology, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 62(3), pages 509-532, July.
    12. von Mises, Ludwig, 1957. "Theory and History," History of Economic Thought Books, McMaster University Archive for the History of Economic Thought, edition 1, number mises1957.
    13. Lewis, Paul & Runde, Jochen, 2007. "Subjectivism, social structure and the possibility of socio-economic order: The case of Ludwig Lachmann," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 62(2), pages 167-186, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Paul Lewis, 2017. "The Ostroms and Hayek as Theorists of Complex Adaptive Systems: Commonality and Complementarity," Advances in Austrian Economics, in: The Austrian and Bloomington Schools of Political Economy, volume 22, pages 35-66, Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
    2. Virgil Henry Storr, 2019. "Ludwig Lachmann’s peculiar status within Austrian economics," The Review of Austrian Economics, Springer;Society for the Development of Austrian Economics, vol. 32(1), pages 63-75, March.
    3. Jayme S. Lemke, 2015. "An Austrian Approach to Class Structure," Advances in Austrian Economics, in: New Thinking in Austrian Political Economy, volume 19, pages 167-192, Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
    4. Jayme Lemke & Jonathan Lingenfelter, 2017. "A Practical Approach to Understanding: The Possibilities and Limitations of Applied Work in Political Economy," Advances in Austrian Economics, in: The Austrian and Bloomington Schools of Political Economy, volume 22, pages 67-88, Emerald Group Publishing Limited.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. David Dequech, 2008. "Varieties of uncertainty: a survey of the economic literature," Anais do XXXVI Encontro Nacional de Economia [Proceedings of the 36th Brazilian Economics Meeting] 200807211223070, ANPEC - Associação Nacional dos Centros de Pós-Graduação em Economia [Brazilian Association of Graduate Programs in Economics].
    2. Loïc Sauce, 2017. "Market process(es) and (un)knowledge," The Review of Austrian Economics, Springer;Society for the Development of Austrian Economics, vol. 30(3), pages 305-321, September.
    3. Paul Lewis, 2014. "Hayek: from economics as equilibrium analysis to economics as social theory," Chapters, in: Roger W. Garrison & Norman Barry (ed.), Elgar Companion to Hayekian Economics, chapter 9, pages 195-223, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    4. Lewis, Paul, 2021. "Elinor's Ostrom's ‘realist orientation’: An investigation of the ontological commitments of her analysis of the possibility of self-governance," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 189(C), pages 623-636.
    5. Lewis, Paul & Runde, Jochen, 2007. "Subjectivism, social structure and the possibility of socio-economic order: The case of Ludwig Lachmann," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 62(2), pages 167-186, February.
    6. Paul Lewis, 2005. "Structure, agency and causality in post-revival Austrian economics: tensions and resolutions," Review of Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(2), pages 291-316.
    7. Calcagno, Peter T. & Hall, Joshua C. & Lawson, Robert A., 2010. "Objectivism versus subjectivism: A market test," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 76(2), pages 445-448, November.
    8. Nicolai J. Foss & Giampaolo Garzarelli, 2007. "Institutions as knowledge capital: Ludwig M. Lachmann's interpretative institutionalism," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 31(5), pages 789-804, September.
    9. Thierry Aimar, 2008. "Self-ignorance: Towards an extension of the Austrian paradigm," The Review of Austrian Economics, Springer;Society for the Development of Austrian Economics, vol. 21(1), pages 23-43, March.
    10. Anthony M. Endres & David A. Harper, 2012. "The kinetics of capital formation and economic organisation," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Oxford University Press, vol. 36(4), pages 963-980.
    11. Muñoz, Félix & Encinar, María Isabel & Fernández-de-Pinedo, Nadia, 2014. "Intentionality and technological and institutional change: Implications for economic development," Working Papers in Economic Theory 2014/04, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid (Spain), Department of Economic Analysis (Economic Theory and Economic History).
    12. Michelle Baddeley, 2017. "Keynes’ psychology and behavioural macroeconomics: Theory and policy," The Economic and Labour Relations Review, , vol. 28(2), pages 177-196, June.
    13. Steven Horwitz, 2011. "Theory, history, and the great recession," The Review of Austrian Economics, Springer;Society for the Development of Austrian Economics, vol. 24(2), pages 171-184, June.
    14. Ramoglou, Stratos, 2021. "Knowable opportunities in an unknowable future? On the epistemological paradoxes of entrepreneurship theory," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 36(2).
    15. Paul Lewis, 2021. "Entrepreneurship, novel combinations, capital regrouping, and the structure-agency relationship: an introduction to the special issue on innovation and Austrian economics," The Review of Austrian Economics, Springer;Society for the Development of Austrian Economics, vol. 34(1), pages 1-12, March.
    16. Rothbard Murray N., 1995. "The Present State of Austrian Economics," Journal des Economistes et des Etudes Humaines, De Gruyter, vol. 6(1), pages 1-48, March.
    17. Gregor Zwirn, 2009. "Ludwig von Mises on the epistemological foundation for social sciences reconstructed," The Review of Austrian Economics, Springer;Society for the Development of Austrian Economics, vol. 22(1), pages 81-107, March.
    18. Paul Lewis, 2008. "Uncertainty, power and trust," The Review of Austrian Economics, Springer;Society for the Development of Austrian Economics, vol. 21(2), pages 183-198, September.
    19. Koppl Roger, 2002. "What is Alertness?," Journal des Economistes et des Etudes Humaines, De Gruyter, vol. 12(1), pages 1-13, March.
    20. Maria Irina Trofin (Dromereschi), 2011. "Entrepreneur: between the old and the new. Portrait of Romanian entrepreneur," Studies and Scientific Researches. Economics Edition, "Vasile Alecsandri" University of Bacau, Faculty of Economic Sciences, issue 16-17.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:ajecsc:v:67:y:2008:i:5:p:827-857. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0002-9246 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.