Author
Listed:
- Shiyao (Camille) Peng
- Ruizhe (Vivian) Wang
- Shan Zhou
- Wei Wu
Abstract
Greenwashing has emerged as a matter of concern, prompting increased enforcement actions and calls for mechanisms, such as sustainability assurance, to address the issue. Accordingly, our study examines the extent to which current sustainability assurance practices address the greenwashing concerns of regulators. Using a sample of Australian and New Zealand listed companies using sustainability assurance in 2023, we assess the alignment between assurance and greenwashing‐related subject matters identified by regulatory guidance and sanction cases. Our findings reveal that while 49.5% of assurance engagements directly address at least one greenwashing‐related subject matter – primarily historical and quantitative disclosures such as greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions – significant gaps persist with respect to forward‐looking sustainability commitments such as net zero, end‐of‐life treatment of sold products and potential sustainability‐related fraud. Regression results further indicate that companies engaging in assurance at a reasonable level, using assurance providers with a high market share, using externally generated and not internally developed reporting criteria, and operating in industries more exposed to greenwashing risk are more likely to assure greenwashing‐related subject matters. Our study contributes to the literature on sustainability assurance and greenwashing by introducing a new dimension of sustainability assurance (i.e., the relevance of assured sustainability matters) and offering practical insights for companies, assurance providers and regulators to better address greenwashing concerns.
Suggested Citation
Shiyao (Camille) Peng & Ruizhe (Vivian) Wang & Shan Zhou & Wei Wu, 2026.
"Do Sustainability Assurance Practices Address the Greenwashing Concerns of Regulators,"
Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 66(1), pages 951-978, March.
Handle:
RePEc:bla:acctfi:v:66:y:2026:i:1:p:951-978
DOI: 10.1111/acfi.70130
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:acctfi:v:66:y:2026:i:1:p:951-978. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aaanzea.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.