IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bjc/journl/v12y2025i5p1801-1816.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Between Knowledge and Power: A Review of the Research-Policy Nexus in Africa’s Social Policy

Author

Listed:
  • Odhiambo Alphonce Kasera

    (Adjunct Lecturer of Political Science and International Relations at Maseno University; Rongo University, and University of Kabianga)

  • Odhiambo Jasper Ogutu

    (Finalists in the Masters of Public Policy and Research (MRPP) Program at Maseno University)

  • Yona Mwo Wilfred

    (Finalists in the Masters of Public Policy and Research (MRPP) Program at Maseno University)

  • Oloo Bruno Charles

    (Finalists in the Undergraduate BA Program in International Relations Diplomacy with IT and very Close Mentees of the First Author.)

  • Oguna Omondi Hemolike

    (Finalists in the Undergraduate BA Program in International Relations Diplomacy with IT and very Close Mentees of the First Author.)

  • Salu Francis Odhiambo

    (Finalists in the Undergraduate BA Program in International Relations Diplomacy with IT and very Close Mentees of the First Author.)

Abstract

Evidence-based policy (EBP) has emerged as a crucial approach in shaping public policy. Originating in the health sector, EBP has tremendously expanded into various social policy domains. In contexts like Africa, the research-policy interface (RPI) should play a pivotal role in driving evidence-informed policy processes -not merely in the making of policies- for addressing the continent’s most pressing challenges such as illicit politics, poverty, and the expanding inequality. Based on critical desk review, the study assessed research-policy nexus within the social policy domains in Africa. The analysis resulted into four interrelated themes: the emergence of EBP in Africa, the nuances of the research-policy interface, the potential for enhanced research utility in social interventions, and the structural barriers impeding meaningful engagement between research outputs and policy demands. The analysis yielded three key findings. First, in the context of Africa, the significance of a strong research-policy interface is underscored as a pathway for targeted interventions and equitable resource allocation. Secondly, collaborative networks, knowledge brokering, and the establishment of national policy observatories are perceived as pivotal in bridging gaps between evidence producers and policy actors -designers, makers, evaluators etc.- thereby promoting a more substantive evidence-informed governance framework. Thirdly and most importantly, entrenched challenges persist, including political dynamics that prioritize survival, entertain poverty, and provide public goods based on patron-client models. Consequently, the paper arrives at the conclusion that the realization of a truly evidence-driven policy architecture in Africa will depend not only on the strengthening of technical capacities of supply side actors and concerted donor demands, but, even more critically, on the political will of ruling elites to prioritize public welfare over political expediency.

Suggested Citation

  • Odhiambo Alphonce Kasera & Odhiambo Jasper Ogutu & Yona Mwo Wilfred & Oloo Bruno Charles & Oguna Omondi Hemolike & Salu Francis Odhiambo, 2025. "Between Knowledge and Power: A Review of the Research-Policy Nexus in Africa’s Social Policy," International Journal of Research and Scientific Innovation, International Journal of Research and Scientific Innovation (IJRSI), vol. 12(5), pages 1801-1816, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:bjc:journl:v:12:y:2025:i:5:p:1801-1816
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.rsisinternational.org/journals/ijrsi/digital-library/volume-12-issue-5/1801-1816.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://rsisinternational.org/journals/ijrsi/articles/between-knowledge-and-power-a-review-of-the-research-policy-nexus-in-africas-social-policy/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Anthony Petrosino & Robert F. Boruch & Haluk Soydan & Lorna Duggan & Julio Sanchez-Meca, 2001. "Meeting the Challenges of Evidence-Based Policy: The Campbell Collaboration," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 578(1), pages 14-34, November.
    2. Paul Cairney & Richard Kwiatkowski, 2017. "How to communicate effectively with policymakers: combine insights from psychology and policy studies," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 3(1), pages 1-8, December.
    3. Behague, Dominique & Tawiah, Charlotte & Rosato, Mikey & Some, Télésphore & Morrison, Joanna, 2009. "Evidence-based policy-making: The implications of globally-applicable research for context-specific problem-solving in developing countries," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 69(10), pages 1539-1546, November.
    4. Odhiambo Alphonce Kasera, 2025. "Statehood Without Substance? The African State and the Crisis of Legitimacy," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 9(4), pages 3740-3754, April.
    5. Kirsty Newman & Catherine Fisher & Louise Shaxson, 2012. "Stimulating Demand for Research Evidence: What Role for Capacity‐building?," IDS Bulletin, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 43(5), pages 17-24, September.
    6. Kathryn Oliver & Annette Boaz, 2019. "Transforming evidence for policy and practice: creating space for new conversations," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 5(1), pages 1-10, December.
    7. Juma, Calestous, 2016. "Innovation and Its Enemies: Why People Resist New Technologies," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780190467036, Decembrie.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Temilade Sesan & Willie Siyanbola, 2021. "“These are the realities”: insights from facilitating researcher-policymaker engagement in Nigeria’s household energy sector," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 8(1), pages 1-11, December.
    2. Ilias Krystallis & Sarah Jasim, 2023. "Charting the path towards a long-term knowledge brokerage function: an ecosystems view," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-13, December.
    3. Diana Arnautu & Christian Dagenais, 2021. "Use and effectiveness of policy briefs as a knowledge transfer tool: a scoping review," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 8(1), pages 1-14, December.
    4. Ruth Mayne & Duncan Green & Irene Guijt & Martin Walsh & Richard English & Paul Cairney, 2018. "Using evidence to influence policy: Oxfam’s experience," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 4(1), pages 1-10, December.
    5. repec:ehl:wpaper:90534 is not listed on IDEAS
    6. Hossain, Mobarak, 2023. "Large-scale data gathering: Exploring World Bank’s influence on national learning assessments in LMICs," International Journal of Educational Development, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    7. Jonathan Breckon, 2022. "Communicating and using systematic reviews—Learning from other disciplines," Campbell Systematic Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 18(4), December.
    8. Blume, Stuart & Tump, Janneke, 2010. "Evidence and policymaking: The introduction of MMR vaccine in the Netherlands," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 71(6), pages 1049-1055, September.
    9. Lowes, Richard & Woodman, Bridget, 2020. "Disruptive and uncertain: Policy makers’ perceptions on UK heat decarbonisation," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 142(C).
    10. Philipp Aerni, 2021. "The Ethics of Farm Animal Biotechnology from an Anthropological Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-16, March.
    11. Rebecca A. Maynard, 2018. "The Role of Federal Agencies in Creating and Administering Evidence-Based Policies," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 678(1), pages 134-144, July.
    12. Micaela Gal & Alison Cooper & Natalie Joseph-Williams & Elizabeth Doe & Ruth Lewis & Rebecca Jane Law & Sally Anstey & Nathan Davies & Amy Walters & Robert Orford & Brendan Collins & Lisa Trigg & Chri, 2024. "Knowledge mobilisation of rapid evidence reviews to inform health and social care policy and practice in a public health emergency: Appraisal of the Wales COVID-19 Evidence Centre processes and impact," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(11), pages 1-29, November.
    13. Syafila Kamarudin & Lian Tang & Jusang Bolong & Nor Azura Adzharuddin, 2024. "A systematic literature review of mitigating cyber security risk," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 58(4), pages 3251-3273, August.
    14. O'Brien, Patrick, 2018. "Cosmographies for the discovery, development and diffusion of useful and reliable knowledge in pre-industrial Europe and Late imperial China: a survey and speculation," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 90534, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    15. Federica Angeli & Silvia Camporesi & Giorgia Dal Fabbro, 2021. "The COVID-19 wicked problem in public health ethics: conflicting evidence, or incommensurable values?," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 8(1), pages 1-8, December.
    16. Antonopoulou, Vivi & chadwick, paul & McGee, O & Sniehotta, Falko & Lorencatto, Fabiana & Meyer, Carly & O'Donnell, Amy & Lecouturier, Jan & Kelly, Michael P & Michie, Susan, 2021. "Research Engagement with Policy Makers: a practical guide to writing policy briefs," OSF Preprints m25qp, Center for Open Science.
    17. Mikayla Novak, 2024. "Sociologically influenced coevolutionary dynamics," Review of Evolutionary Political Economy, Springer, vol. 5(3), pages 473-493, October.
    18. David B. Wilson, 2001. "Meta-Analytic Methods for Criminology," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 578(1), pages 71-89, November.
    19. Roger W. Harris, 2016. "How ICT4D Research Fails the Poor," Information Technology for Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(1), pages 177-192, January.
    20. Jordans, M.J.D. & Tol, W.A. & Komproe, I.H., 2011. "Mental health interventions for children in adversity: Pilot-testing a research strategy for treatment selection in low-income settings," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 73(3), pages 456-466, August.
    21. Michelle Farr & Philippa Davies & Heidi Andrews & Darren Bagnall & Emer Brangan & Rosemary Davies, 2021. "Co-producing knowledge in health and social care research: reflections on the challenges and ways to enable more equal relationships," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 8(1), pages 1-7, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bjc:journl:v:12:y:2025:i:5:p:1801-1816. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dr. Renu Malsaria (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://rsisinternational.org/journals/ijrsi/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.