IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bfr/bullbf/202123405.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Le blocage de l’OMC, un révélateur de la crise du multilatéralisme ?

Author

Listed:
  • Paul Laurent,
  • Jeudy Bruno-Philippe.

Abstract

Depuis 1995, l’OMC s’était imposée comme l’institution internationale au centre du système mondial d’échanges, succès illustré par l’adhésion de la Chine en 2001 et de la Russie en 2012. Mais elle fait aujourd’hui face à une crise existentielle avec le blocage de l’organe d’appel du mécanisme de règlement des différends commerciaux (ORD). Or en l’absence d’outil efficace pour régler les différends commerciaux entre États, le fonctionnement de l’ensemble du commerce international risque d’être perturbé, dans un contexte où la pandémie de Covid-19 réduit depuis un an très fortement le volume des échanges. L’incertitude sur le rythme de la reprise des échanges renforce la nécessité d’une réponse coordonnée de l’Union européenne pour rappeler à ses partenaires commerciaux que le multilatéralisme reste la meilleure voie possible en matière d’échanges internationaux.

Suggested Citation

  • Paul Laurent, & Jeudy Bruno-Philippe., 2021. "Le blocage de l’OMC, un révélateur de la crise du multilatéralisme ?," Bulletin de la Banque de France, Banque de France, issue 234.
    • Handle: RePEc:bfr:bullbf:2021:234:05
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://publications.banque-france.fr/sites/default/files/medias/documents/bdf_234-5_blocage_omc.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bown, Chad P. & Keynes, Soumaya, 2020. "Why Trump shot the Sheriffs: The end of WTO dispute settlement 1.0," Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 42(4), pages 799-819.
    2. Anabel Gonzalez & Nicolas Veron, 2019. "EU Trade Policy amid the China-US Clash: Caught in the Cross-Fire?," Working Paper Series WP19-13, Peterson Institute for International Economics.
    3. Anabel González & Nicolas Véron, 2019. "EU trade policy amid the China-US clash- caught in the crossfire?," Working Papers 32427, Bruegel.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sebastian Santander & Antonios Vlassis, 2021. "The EU in Search of Autonomy in the Era of Chinese Expansionism and COVID‐19 Pandemic," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 12(1), pages 149-156, February.
    2. Liu, Nan, 2020. "Trade war from the Chinese trenches," MPRA Paper 103929, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    3. Liu, Nan, 2020. "Trade war from the Chinese trenches," MPRA Paper 110175, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    4. Giuseppe Zaccaria, 2022. "You’re Fired! International Courts, Re‐contracting, and the WTO Appellate Body during the Trump Presidency," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 13(3), pages 322-333, June.
    5. Jason H. Grant & Kathryn A. Boys & Chaoping Xie, 2021. "A new president in the White House: implications for Canadian agricultural trade," Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d'agroeconomie, Canadian Agricultural Economics Society/Societe canadienne d'agroeconomie, vol. 69(1), pages 45-58, March.
    6. Chad Brown & Paola Conconi & Aksel Erbahar & Lorenzo Trimarchi, 2020. "Trade Protection Along Supply Chains," Working Papers ECARES 2020-52, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
    7. Mauro Caselli & Andrea Fracasso & Stefano Schiavo, 2021. "Trade policy and firm performance: introduction to the special section," Economia Politica: Journal of Analytical and Institutional Economics, Springer;Fondazione Edison, vol. 38(1), pages 1-6, April.
    8. Bown, Chad P., 2021. "The US–China trade war and Phase One agreement," Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 43(4), pages 805-843.
    9. Bown, Chad, 2020. "Export Controls: America’s Other National Security Threat," CEPR Discussion Papers 14739, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    10. Eugene Beaulieu & Janet Whittaker, 2021. ""Two roads diverged in [soft]wood". Targeted dumping, differential pricing methodology, and zeroing: US-Canada anti-dumping in softwood lumber (WTDS534/R)," RSCAS Working Papers 2021/11, European University Institute.
    11. Ian M. Sheldon, 2022. "The United States' power‐based bargaining and the WTO: Has anything really been gained?," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 44(3), pages 1424-1439, September.
    12. Johann Robert Basedow, 2022. "Why de‐judicialize? Explaining state preferences on judicialization in World Trade Organization Dispute Settlement Body and Investor‐to‐State Dispute Settlement reforms," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 16(4), pages 1362-1381, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bfr:bullbf:2021:234:05. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Michael brassart (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/bdfgvfr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.