IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/beo/ekidpr/y2026i60p59-73.html

EVALUATING FISCAL REFORM EFFECT ОN INFLATION: DIFFERENCE IN DIFFERENCES INSIGHTS FROM 'Europe Now!' IN MONTENEGRO

Author

Listed:
  • Stevan Đurić
  • Nemanja Popović
  • Vera Gojčaj
  • Milivoje Radović

Abstract

This paper examines the economic impact of Montenegro’s fiscal program, Europe Now!, implemented in 2022, using a Difference-in-Difference (DiD) approach. The program, aimed at increasing wages and stimulating economic growth, is evaluated for its contribution to inflation dynamics between Montenegro and the Euro Area. Leveraging monthly inflation rate data from 2011 to 2025, the study estimates that Europe Now! caused an additional 2.6 percentage point increase in inflation in Montenegro during the post-intervention period, compared to the Euro Area. While Montenegro's inflation remained persistently high the program’s relative contribution to inflation was modest, especially when compared with the substantial increase in average wages. Robustness checks and model diagnostics affirm the validity of these findings. Additionally, a nonparametric bootstrap methodology provided reliable confidence intervals for the DiD coefficient, yielding a 95% interval of (0.609, 4.430). This further substantiated the statistical significance of the program’s inflationary impact while accounting for non-normal residual distributions. A placebo test, employing a fictitious pre-treatment year (2015), confirmed that the observed effects were specific to the intervention in 2022 and not driven by spurious patterns or preexisting trends. The study highlights the trade-off inherent in fiscal reforms, demonstrating that the Europe Now! program successfully boosted wages substantially while contributing a relatively small, manageable rise in inflation. These findings underscore the importance of robust econometric techniques in evaluating policy impacts and provide a framework for analyzing similar fiscal interventions in other contexts.

Suggested Citation

  • Stevan Đurić & Nemanja Popović & Vera Gojčaj & Milivoje Radović, 2026. "EVALUATING FISCAL REFORM EFFECT ОN INFLATION: DIFFERENCE IN DIFFERENCES INSIGHTS FROM 'Europe Now!' IN MONTENEGRO," Ekonomske ideje i praksa, Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Belgrade, issue 60, pages 59-73, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:beo:ekidpr:y:2026:i:60:p:59-73
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.ekof.bg.ac.rs/journals/eip/60/414.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yilmaz Bayar, 2017. "Public Governance And Financial Development In Central And Eastern European Countries," Ekonomske ideje i praksa, Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Belgrade, issue 24, pages 53-65, March.
    2. Cribari-Neto, Francisco, 2004. "Asymptotic inference under heteroskedasticity of unknown form," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 45(2), pages 215-233, March.
    3. Altissimo, Filippo & Benigno, Pierpaolo & Rodriguez Palenzuela, Diego, 2005. "Long-Run Determinants of Inflation Differentials in a Monetary Union," CEPR Discussion Papers 5149, Centre for Economic Policy Research.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Benoît Le Maux & Federica Minardy & Charlotte Magalhaes, 2011. "Determinants of Electoral Outcomes: A simple Test of Meltzer and Richard's Hypothesis," Economics Working Paper from Condorcet Center for political Economy at CREM-CNRS 2011-03-ccr, Condorcet Center for political Economy.
    2. Pami Dua & Deepika Goel, 2021. "Inflation Persistence in India," Journal of Quantitative Economics, Springer;The Indian Econometric Society (TIES), vol. 19(3), pages 525-553, September.
    3. repec:ags:aaea22:335733 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Harashima, Taiji, 2011. "A Mechanism of Inflation Differentials and Current Account Imbalances in the Euro Area," MPRA Paper 28121, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    5. Szafranek, Karol, 2017. "Flattening of the New Keynesian Phillips curve: Evidence for an emerging, small open economy," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 334-348.
    6. Katarzyna Jabłońska, 2018. "Dealing With Heteroskedasticity Within The Modeling Of The Quality Of Life Of Older People," Statistics in Transition New Series, Polish Statistical Association, vol. 19(3), pages 423-452, September.
    7. Patrick K Piekarski & Stephany Valdés-Rodríguez & Daniel J C Kronauer, 2023. "Conditional indirect genetic effects of caregivers on brood in the clonal raider ant," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 34(4), pages 642-652.
    8. Iulia Siedschlag, 2008. "Macroeconomic Differentials and Adjustment in the Euro Area," SUERF Studies, SUERF - The European Money and Finance Forum, number 2008/3 edited by Morten Balling, May.
    9. Andrzej Toroj, 2009. "Macroeconomic adjustment and heterogeneity in the euro area," NBP Working Papers 54, Narodowy Bank Polski.
    10. Cheng, Tsung-Chi, 2012. "On simultaneously identifying outliers and heteroscedasticity without specific form," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 56(7), pages 2258-2272.
    11. Pötscher, Benedikt M. & Preinerstorfer, David, 2025. "Valid Heteroskedasticity Robust Testing," Econometric Theory, Cambridge University Press, vol. 41(2), pages 249-301, April.
    12. Consolo, Agostino & Koester, Gerrit & Nickel, Christiane & Porqueddu, Mario & Smets, Frank, 2021. "The need for an inflation buffer in the ECB’s price stability objective – the role of nominal rigidities and inflation differentials," Occasional Paper Series 279, European Central Bank.
    13. Rand R. Wilcox, 2017. "Linear regression: robust heteroscedastic confidence bands that have some specified simultaneous probability coverage," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 44(14), pages 2564-2574, October.
    14. Zeileis, Achim, 2006. "Implementing a class of structural change tests: An econometric computing approach," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 50(11), pages 2987-3008, July.
    15. Mirko Abbritti; Sebastian Weber, 2008. "Labor Market Rigidities and the Business Cycle: Price vs. Quantity Restricting Institutions," IHEID Working Papers 01-2008, Economics Section, The Graduate Institute of International Studies, revised Jan 2008.
    16. Florio, Anna & Siena, Daniele & Zago, Riccardo, 2025. "Global value chains and the Phillips curve: A challenge for monetary policy," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    17. Benedikt M. Potscher & David Preinerstorfer, 2024. "A Necessary and Sufficient Condition for Size Controllability of Heteroskedasticity Robust Test Statistics," Papers 2412.17470, arXiv.org, revised Jun 2026.
    18. Pötscher, Benedikt M. & Preinerstorfer, David, 2023. "How Reliable Are Bootstrap-Based Heteroskedasticity Robust Tests?," Econometric Theory, Cambridge University Press, vol. 39(4), pages 789-847, August.
    19. Francisco Cribari-Neto & Maria da Gloria Lima, 2010. "Approximate inference in heteroskedastic regressions: A numerical evaluation," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(4), pages 591-615.
    20. MacKinnon, James G., 2011. "Thirty Years of Heteroskedasticity-Robust Inference," Queen's Economics Department Working Papers 273816, Queen's University - Department of Economics.
    21. Lyócsa, Štefan & Molnár, Peter, 2017. "The effect of non-trading days on volatility forecasts in equity markets," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 23(C), pages 39-49.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • E62 - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics - - Macroeconomic Policy, Macroeconomic Aspects of Public Finance, and General Outlook - - - Fiscal Policy; Modern Monetary Theory
    • C21 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Single Equation Models; Single Variables - - - Cross-Sectional Models; Spatial Models; Treatment Effect Models

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:beo:ekidpr:y:2026:i:60:p:59-73. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Marina Lečei (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/efbeoyu.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.