IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bdu/ojijsm/v4y2025i1p47-65id3335.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Effect of Organizational Agility on Performance of Commercial Banks in Nairobi City County, Kenya

Author

Listed:
  • Yona Israel Samo
  • Dr. Kadian Wanyonyi Wanyama
  • Dr. Michael Washika Okonda

Abstract

Purpose: To examine the effect of organizational agility on the performance of commercial banks in Nairobi City County, Kenya, in the context of adapting to market changes and evolving customer demands and regulatory requirements. Methodology: The research employed a mixed-methods design that integrated both quantitative and qualitative approaches to explore the relationship between organizational agility and bank performance in Nairobi City County, Kenya. Quantitative data was collected using structured questionnaires administered to 108 branch and operational managers, focusing on variables such as organizational agility and bank performance. Additionally, qualitative insights were gathered through semi-structured interviews with 38 Chief Executive Officers, which facilitated an in-depth examination of strategic flexibility practices. Participants were selected through stratified random sampling, resulting in a high response rate. The data collection process adhered to ethical guidelines and included a pilot study to ensure the instruments' reliability and validity. Quantitative analysis consisted of descriptive statistics, correlation, and regression analyses, while qualitative data were thematically analyzed to provide comprehensive insights. Findings: The findings on organizational agility in commercial banks in Nairobi City County reveal a high level of adaptability among respondents, with quantitative data collected via eight questionnaire items demonstrating significant agreement across various aspects of agility. The statement with the highest mean score of 4.19 (SD = 0.76) emphasized the bank's focus on actively seeking and valuing customer feedback, while the lowest mean of 4.03 (SD = 0.79) indicated potential improvements in decision-making speed related to organizational structure. Overall, all mean scores exceeded 4.00, confirming a strong perception of organizational agility. Additionally, a simple linear regression analysis illustrated that organizational agility significantly predicts bank performance, with an R-value of 0.681 and an R-squared value of 0.464, indicating that it explains 46.4% of the variance in performance. The unstandardized coefficient for organizational agility was 0.625 (SE = 0.049), suggesting that a one-unit increase in agility is associated with a 0.625-unit improvement in performance. Qualitative interviews with bank executives and managers further supported these findings, emphasizing that organizational agility directly translates into better financial performance and customer satisfaction, thus reinforcing the critical role of organizational agility in enhancing performance within the competitive banking environment. Unique Contributions to Theory, Practice and Policy: The study provides valuable insights for banking executives by highlighting the importance of organizational agility in enhancing responsiveness to market changes. Regulatory bodies can leverage these insights to formulate policies that support the adaptability and resilience of the banking sector. The findings encourage academic researchers to further explore the theoretical connections between strategic management and dynamic environments, thus contributing to the academic discourse on strategic flexibility. Key recommendations for commercial banks emphasize the need to prioritize the development of organizational agility to improve their responsiveness to market changes.

Suggested Citation

  • Yona Israel Samo & Dr. Kadian Wanyonyi Wanyama & Dr. Michael Washika Okonda, 2025. "Effect of Organizational Agility on Performance of Commercial Banks in Nairobi City County, Kenya," International Journal of Strategic Management, IPRJB, vol. 4(1), pages 47-65.
  • Handle: RePEc:bdu:ojijsm:v:4:y:2025:i:1:p:47-65:id:3335
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.iprjb.org/journals/index.php/IJSM/article/view/3335
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Margaret A. Peteraf & Jay B. Barney, 2003. "Unraveling the resource-based tangle," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 24(4), pages 309-323.
    2. Kathleen M. Eisenhardt & Jeffrey A. Martin, 2000. "Dynamic capabilities: what are they?," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 21(10‐11), pages 1105-1121, October.
    3. Teece, David J, 2018. "Dynamic capabilities as (workable) management systems theory," Journal of Management & Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 24(3), pages 359-368, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Waleczek, Peter & von den Driesch, Till & Flatten, Tessa C. & Brettel, Malte, 2019. "On the dynamic bundles behind operations management and research and development," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 37(2), pages 175-187.
    2. Víctor Hugo Nopo Olazabal & Niria Marleny Goni Avila, 2022. "Dynamic capabilities in sole proprietorships: theoretical model through grounded theory," Journal of International Entrepreneurship, Springer, vol. 20(4), pages 591-618, December.
    3. Dinko Herman BOIKANYO, 2024. "Utilization Of 4ir Technologies To Enhance Strategic Intelligence And Dynamic Capabilities For A Sustainable Competitive Advantage," Business Excellence and Management, Faculty of Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 14(1), pages 5-24, March.
    4. Parker J. Woodroof & George D. Deitz & Katharine M. Howie & Robert D. Evans, 2019. "The effect of cause-related marketing on firm value: a look at Fortune’s most admired all-stars," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 47(5), pages 899-918, September.
    5. Scheuer, Luca Joachim & Thaler, Julia, 2023. "How do dynamic capabilities affect performance? A systematic review of mediators," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 41(6), pages 914-931.
    6. Jing Zeng & Yunlu Yang & Soo Hee Lee, 2023. "Resource Orchestration and Scaling‐up of Platform‐Based Entrepreneurial Firms: The Logic of Dialectic Tuning," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 60(3), pages 605-638, May.
    7. Ilgaz Arikan & Ipek Koparan & Asli M Arikan & Oded Shenkar, 2022. "Dynamic capabilities and internationalization of authentic firms: Role of heritage assets, administrative heritage, and signature processes," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 53(4), pages 601-635, June.
    8. Alejandro J. Gutiérrez Rodríguez & Nini Johanna Barón & José Manuel Guaita Martínez, 2020. "Validity of Dynamic Capabilities in the Operation Based on New Sustainability Narratives on Nature Tourism SMEs and Clusters," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-18, January.
    9. Kraaijenbrink, Jeroen & Spender, JC & Groen, Aard, 2009. "The resource-based view: A review and assessment of its critiques," MPRA Paper 21442, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    10. Judith Cavazos-Arroyo & Rogelio Puente-Diaz, 2019. "The Influence of Marketing Capability in Mexican Social Enterprises," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(17), pages 1-15, August.
    11. Laurence Capron & Will Mitchell, 2009. "Selection Capability: How Capability Gaps and Internal Social Frictions Affect Internal and External Strategic Renewal," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 20(2), pages 294-312, April.
    12. Marcus Dejardin & Mario L. Raposo & João J. Ferreira & Cristina I. Fernandes & Pedro M. Veiga & Luís Farinha, 2023. "The impact of dynamic capabilities on SME performance during COVID-19," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 17(5), pages 1703-1729, July.
    13. Eduardo Tomé & Elizaveta Gromova, 2021. "Development of Emergent Knowledge Strategies and New Dynamic Capabilities for Business Education in a Time of Crisis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-16, April.
    14. Patrick Mikalef & Ilias O. Pappas & John Krogstie & Michail Giannakos, 2018. "Big data analytics capabilities: a systematic literature review and research agenda," Information Systems and e-Business Management, Springer, vol. 16(3), pages 547-578, August.
    15. Charatsari, Chrysanthi & Michailidis, Anastasios & Lioutas, Evagelos D., 2024. "Do farm advisory organizations promote sustainability? A study in Greece," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 218(C).
    16. Ritu Singh & Parikshit Charan & Manojit Chattopadhyay, 2019. "Dynamic capabilities and responsiveness: moderating effect of organization structures and environmental dynamism," DECISION: Official Journal of the Indian Institute of Management Calcutta, Springer;Indian Institute of Management Calcutta, vol. 46(4), pages 301-319, December.
    17. Deon Montasser & Ruslan Prijadi & Tengku Ezni Balqiah, 2023. "The Mediating Effect of IT-Enabled Dynamic Capabilities and Organizational Readiness on the Relationship Between Transformational Leadership and Digital Business Model Innovation: Evidence From Indone," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(2), pages 21582440231, June.
    18. Tomasz Obloj & Krzysztof Obloj & Michael G. Pratt, 2010. "Dominant Logic and Entrepreneurial Firms‘ Performance in a Transition Economy," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 34(1), pages 151-170, January.
    19. Viacheslav Iurkov & Gabriel R G Benito, 2020. "Change in domestic network centrality, uncertainty, and the foreign divestment decisions of firms," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 51(5), pages 788-812, July.
    20. Tze San Ong & Ah Suat Lee & Boon Heng Teh & Hussain Bakhsh Magsi, 2019. "Environmental Innovation, Environmental Performance and Financial Performance: Evidence from Malaysian Environmental Proactive Firms," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-18, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bdu:ojijsm:v:4:y:2025:i:1:p:47-65:id:3335. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chief Editor (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://iprjb.org/journals/index.php/IJSM/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.