IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bdu/ojijsm/v4y2025i1p47-65id3335.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Effect of Organizational Agility on Performance of Commercial Banks in Nairobi City County, Kenya

Author

Listed:
  • Yona Israel Samo
  • Dr. Kadian Wanyonyi Wanyama
  • Dr. Michael Washika Okonda

Abstract

Purpose: To examine the effect of organizational agility on the performance of commercial banks in Nairobi City County, Kenya, in the context of adapting to market changes and evolving customer demands and regulatory requirements. Methodology: The research employed a mixed-methods design that integrated both quantitative and qualitative approaches to explore the relationship between organizational agility and bank performance in Nairobi City County, Kenya. Quantitative data was collected using structured questionnaires administered to 108 branch and operational managers, focusing on variables such as organizational agility and bank performance. Additionally, qualitative insights were gathered through semi-structured interviews with 38 Chief Executive Officers, which facilitated an in-depth examination of strategic flexibility practices. Participants were selected through stratified random sampling, resulting in a high response rate. The data collection process adhered to ethical guidelines and included a pilot study to ensure the instruments' reliability and validity. Quantitative analysis consisted of descriptive statistics, correlation, and regression analyses, while qualitative data were thematically analyzed to provide comprehensive insights. Findings: The findings on organizational agility in commercial banks in Nairobi City County reveal a high level of adaptability among respondents, with quantitative data collected via eight questionnaire items demonstrating significant agreement across various aspects of agility. The statement with the highest mean score of 4.19 (SD = 0.76) emphasized the bank's focus on actively seeking and valuing customer feedback, while the lowest mean of 4.03 (SD = 0.79) indicated potential improvements in decision-making speed related to organizational structure. Overall, all mean scores exceeded 4.00, confirming a strong perception of organizational agility. Additionally, a simple linear regression analysis illustrated that organizational agility significantly predicts bank performance, with an R-value of 0.681 and an R-squared value of 0.464, indicating that it explains 46.4% of the variance in performance. The unstandardized coefficient for organizational agility was 0.625 (SE = 0.049), suggesting that a one-unit increase in agility is associated with a 0.625-unit improvement in performance. Qualitative interviews with bank executives and managers further supported these findings, emphasizing that organizational agility directly translates into better financial performance and customer satisfaction, thus reinforcing the critical role of organizational agility in enhancing performance within the competitive banking environment. Unique Contributions to Theory, Practice and Policy: The study provides valuable insights for banking executives by highlighting the importance of organizational agility in enhancing responsiveness to market changes. Regulatory bodies can leverage these insights to formulate policies that support the adaptability and resilience of the banking sector. The findings encourage academic researchers to further explore the theoretical connections between strategic management and dynamic environments, thus contributing to the academic discourse on strategic flexibility. Key recommendations for commercial banks emphasize the need to prioritize the development of organizational agility to improve their responsiveness to market changes.

Suggested Citation

  • Yona Israel Samo & Dr. Kadian Wanyonyi Wanyama & Dr. Michael Washika Okonda, 2025. "Effect of Organizational Agility on Performance of Commercial Banks in Nairobi City County, Kenya," International Journal of Strategic Management, IPRJB, vol. 4(1), pages 47-65.
  • Handle: RePEc:bdu:ojijsm:v:4:y:2025:i:1:p:47-65:id:3335
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.iprjb.org/journals/index.php/IJSM/article/view/3335
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kathleen M. Eisenhardt & Jeffrey A. Martin, 2000. "Dynamic capabilities: what are they?," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 21(10‐11), pages 1105-1121, October.
    2. Margaret A. Peteraf & Jay B. Barney, 2003. "Unraveling the resource-based tangle," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 24(4), pages 309-323.
    3. Teece, David J, 2018. "Dynamic capabilities as (workable) management systems theory," Journal of Management & Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 24(3), pages 359-368, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Judith Cavazos-Arroyo & Rogelio Puente-Diaz, 2019. "The Influence of Marketing Capability in Mexican Social Enterprises," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(17), pages 1-15, August.
    2. Laurence Capron & Will Mitchell, 2009. "Selection Capability: How Capability Gaps and Internal Social Frictions Affect Internal and External Strategic Renewal," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 20(2), pages 294-312, April.
    3. Truyens, Jasper & De Bosscher, Veerle & Sotiriadou, Popi & Heyndels, Bruno & Westerbeek, Hans, 2016. "A method to evaluate countries’ organisational capacity: A four country comparison in athletics," Sport Management Review, Elsevier, vol. 19(3), pages 279-292.
    4. Camisón, César & Forés, Beatriz, 2011. "Knowledge creation and absorptive capacity: The effect of intra-district shared competences," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 27(1), pages 66-86, March.
    5. Chang-Geun Kim & Oh-Suk Yang, 2024. "Global Companies’ Dynamic Response to Business Environment Uncertainty through Digital Transformation: Sustainable Digital Quality–Customer Value–Market Performance Relationships," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(15), pages 1-32, July.
    6. Tan, Justin & Wang, Liang, 2010. "Flexibility-efficiency tradeoff and performance implications among Chinese SOEs," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 63(4), pages 356-362, April.
    7. Jorge Vareda Gomes & Mário José Batista Romão, 2023. "Gaining a Competitive Advantage Through Benefits Management," International Journal of Strategic Decision Sciences (IJSDS), IGI Global, vol. 14(1), pages 1-15, January.
    8. Carayannopoulos, Sofy & Auster, Ellen R., 2010. "External knowledge sourcing in biotechnology through acquisition versus alliance: A KBV approach," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(2), pages 254-267, March.
    9. Abel Duarte Alonso & Seng K. Kok & Seamus O'Brien, 2019. "Understanding Approaches To Innovation Through The Dynamic Capabilities Lens: A Multi-Country Study Of The Wine Industry," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 23(06), pages 1-30, August.
    10. John Mugambwa Serumaga-Zake & John Andrew van der Poll, 2021. "Addressing the Impact of Fourth Industrial Revolution on South African Manufacturing Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-31, October.
    11. Miikka Blomster & Timo Koivumäki, 2022. "Exploring the resources, competencies, and capabilities needed for successful machine learning projects in digital marketing," Information Systems and e-Business Management, Springer, vol. 20(1), pages 123-169, March.
    12. Vrontis, Demetris & Basile, Gianpaolo & Simona Andreano, M. & Mazzitelli, Andrea & Papasolomou, Ioanna, 2020. "The profile of innovation driven Italian SMEs and the relationship between the firms’ networking abilities and dynamic capabilities," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 313-324.
    13. Ayden, Yuksel & Tatoglu, Ekrem & Glaister, Keith W. & Demirbag, Mehmet, 2021. "Exploring the internationalization strategies of Turkish multinationals: A multi-perspective analysis," Journal of International Management, Elsevier, vol. 27(3).
    14. Nicole Coviello & Martin Cox, 2006. "The resource dynamics of international new venture networks," Journal of International Entrepreneurship, Springer, vol. 4(2), pages 113-132, September.
    15. Nicolaï Foss & Nils Stieglitz, 2012. "Modern Resource-based Theory(ies)," Chapters, in: Michael Dietrich & Jackie Krafft (ed.), Handbook on the Economics and Theory of the Firm, chapter 20, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    16. Daniel Schallmo & Christopher A. Williams & Jochen Lohse, 2019. "Digital Strategy — Integrated Approach And Generic Options," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 23(08), pages 1-24, December.
    17. Stav Fainshmidt & Amir Pezeshkan & M. Lance Frazier & Anil Nair & Edward Markowski, 2016. "Dynamic Capabilities and Organizational Performance: A Meta-Analytic Evaluation and Extension," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 53(8), pages 1348-1380, December.
    18. Víctor Hugo Nopo Olazabal & Niria Marleny Goni Avila, 2022. "Dynamic capabilities in sole proprietorships: theoretical model through grounded theory," Journal of International Entrepreneurship, Springer, vol. 20(4), pages 591-618, December.
    19. Patrick Mikalef & Ilias O. Pappas & John Krogstie & Michail Giannakos, 2018. "Big data analytics capabilities: a systematic literature review and research agenda," Information Systems and e-Business Management, Springer, vol. 16(3), pages 547-578, August.
    20. Charatsari, Chrysanthi & Michailidis, Anastasios & Lioutas, Evagelos D., 2024. "Do farm advisory organizations promote sustainability? A study in Greece," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 218(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bdu:ojijsm:v:4:y:2025:i:1:p:47-65:id:3335. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chief Editor (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://iprjb.org/journals/index.php/IJSM/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.