IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bcp/journl/v9y2025issue-9p8376-8385.html

Autonomous English Learning in a Digital Context: Insights from Chinese College Educators

Author

Listed:
  • Zhu Jiang

    (Akademi Pengajian Bahasa, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Negeri Sembilan Campus)

  • Soo Kum Yoke

    (Akademi Pengajian Bahasa, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Negeri Sembilan Campus)

  • Wan Zumusni Wan Mustapha

    (Akademi Pengajian Bahasa, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Negeri Sembilan Campus)

Abstract

With an emphasis on how digital technologies, teacher beliefs, and institutional frameworks influence learner autonomy, this study explores Chinese college educators' perspectives on autonomous English learning in a digital setting. The study, which is based on qualitative data from interviews and thematic analyses (Tables 1–9), shows that students' attitudes toward autonomy are divided: some exhibit skepticism, an excessive dependence on translation software and artificial intelligence (AI) tools, and a lack of intrinsic motivation, while others show enthusiasm, resourcefulness, and goal-oriented self-direction. This disparity highlights how the digital world can be both a facilitator and a crutch, exacerbating differences in preparedness for independence. The results emphasize how important teachers are in mediating autonomy. It is widely acknowledged that autonomy is socially constructed rather than entirely individual, and that educators' views, personalities, and pedagogical decisions have a substantial impact on students' ability to self-regulate. Furthermore, while digital conveniences like smart apps, multimedia materials, and flexible access increase learning opportunities, their usefulness hinges on how well students can use them. Although extracurricular activities and curriculum structures offer encouraging environments, opportunities for independent learning are restricted when there is an excessive focus on teacher-assigned work. According to the study's findings, autonomy is a developmental process that calls for specialized support as well as an outcome. Although there is a lot of promise for enabling self-directed English learners in digital contexts, success depends on the cooperation of systemic support, teacher facilitation, and learner preparation.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhu Jiang & Soo Kum Yoke & Wan Zumusni Wan Mustapha, 2025. "Autonomous English Learning in a Digital Context: Insights from Chinese College Educators," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 9(9), pages 8376-8385, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:bcp:journl:v:9:y:2025:issue-9:p:8376-8385
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/Digital-Library/volume-9-issue-9/8376-8385.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/articles/autonomous-english-learning-in-a-digital-context-insights-from-chinese-college-educators/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zhaoxi Wei, 2024. "RETRACTED ARTICLE: Navigating Digital Learning Landscapes: Unveiling the Interplay Between Learning Behaviors, Digital Literacy, and Educational Outcomes," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 15(3), pages 10516-10546, September.
    2. Iuliana M. CHITAC, 2022. "The Rationale For Saturation In Qualitative Research: When Practice Informs Theory," CrossCultural Management Journal, Fundația Română pentru Inteligența Afacerii, Editorial Department, issue 1, pages 29-35, July.
    3. Michael A Cusumano & Annabelle Gawer & David B Yoffie, 2021. "Can self-regulation save digital platforms? [Uncertainty and the welfare economics of medical care]," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 30(5), pages 1259-1285.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Klingenberg, Cristina Orsolin & Valle Antunes Júnior, José Antônio & Müller-Seitz, Gordon, 2022. "Impacts of digitalization on value creation and capture: Evidence from the agricultural value chain," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 201(C).
    2. Gawer, Annabelle & Harracá, Martín, 2025. "Inconsistent platform governance and social contagion of misconduct in digital ecosystems: A complementors perspective," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 54(8).
    3. Victorine Verlooy & Vincent Heimburg & Maximilian Schreieck & Manuel Wiesche, 2026. "Power contestation and regulation in digital platform ecosystems—The case of the EU’s Digital Markets Act," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 36(1), pages 1-21, December.
    4. Khan, Zaheer & Zeng, Jing & Knight, Gary & Rajwani, Tazeeb & Pattnaik, Chinmay, 2023. "Non-market strategies and disruptive innovation in the platform economy," Journal of International Management, Elsevier, vol. 29(5).
    5. Valeria Cirillo & Donato Cutolo & Dario Guarascio & Martin Kenney & Jacopo Tramontano, 2025. "Leveraging Workforce Flexibility to Navigate Platform-Induced Uncertainty: A study of the Italian Restaurant and Hospitality Sectors," LEM Papers Series 2025/07, Laboratory of Economics and Management (LEM), Sant'Anna School of Advanced Studies, Pisa, Italy.
    6. Michael G Jacobides & Ioannis Lianos, 2021. "Regulating platforms and ecosystems: an introduction [Ecosystem as structure: an actionable construct for strategy]," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 30(5), pages 1131-1142.
    7. Luca Grilli & Sergio Mariotti & Riccardo Marzano, 2024. "Artificial intelligence and shapeshifting capitalism," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 34(2), pages 303-318, April.
    8. Sun, Yiwen & Pinkse, Jonatan & Bleda, Mercedes, 2025. "Social media platforms' use of nonmarket strategy to manage politically contentious issues in host countries: The case of TikTok in the US market," Journal of International Management, Elsevier, vol. 31(6).
    9. Koo, Wesley W., 2024. "Hybrid governance of platform entrepreneurs," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 53(2).
    10. Wiśniewska-Paluszak, J. & Paluszak, G. & Fiore, M. & Coticchio, A. & Galati, A. & Lira, J., 2023. "Urban agriculture business models and value propositions: Mixed methods approach based on evidence from Polish and Italian case studies," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 127(C).
    11. Tan, Weijie & Tang, Qiuyu & Sun, Wanting & Du, Xuanyu, 2025. "Unintended consequences: Examining the effects of government digital regulation on corporate fintech innovation in China," Emerging Markets Review, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    12. Soltanzadeh, Javad & Blind, Knut & Elyasi, Mehdi, 2023. "Exploring how regulators face platform business issues in the lifecycle stages: Evidence of iranian ride-hailing platform business," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 47(7).
    13. Simon Michalke & Lisa Lohrenz & Christoph Lattemann & Susanne Robra-Bissantz, 2022. "Exploring engagement, well-being, and welfare on engagement platforms: Insight into the personal service sector from the DACH region," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 32(4), pages 2429-2444, December.
    14. Lina Warnke & Anna-Lena Maier & Dirk Ulrich Gilbert, 2024. "Social media platforms’ responses to COVID-19-related mis- and disinformation: the insufficiency of self-governance," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 28(4), pages 1079-1115, December.
    15. Jovanovic, Marin & Kostić, Nikola & Sebastian, Ina M. & Sedej, Tomaz, 2022. "Managing a blockchain-based platform ecosystem for industry-wide adoption: The case of TradeLens," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).
    16. Rawhouser, Hans & Webb, Justin W. & Rodrigues, Jason & Waldron, Theodore L. & Kumaraswamy, Arun & Amankwah-Amoah, Joseph & Grady, Azucena, 2022. "“Scaling, blockchain technology, and entrepreneurial opportunities in developing countries”," Journal of Business Venturing Insights, Elsevier, vol. 18(C).
    17. Shagun Tripathi & Georgios Petropoulos & Harris Kyriakou, 2025. "Assessing the Impact of Algorithmic Quantity Regulations on Sharing Platforms: Evidence from Airbnb in Paris," CESifo Working Paper Series 11811, CESifo.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bcp:journl:v:9:y:2025:issue-9:p:8376-8385. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dr. Pawan Verma (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.