IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bcp/journl/v9y2025issue-9p6023-6031.html

Ethnic Inclusivism and Exclusivism in Kenya’s Politics: A Dialectical Analysis of the Mwai Kibaki Regime, 2002–2013

Author

Listed:
  • Ngaruiya Amos Kariuki

    (Department of History, Archaeology and Political Studies, Kenyatta University)

  • Gimode Atianyi Edwin

    (Department of History, Archaeology and Political Studies, Kenyatta University)

  • Otieno Isaiah Oduor

    (Department of History, Archaeology and Political Studies, Kenyatta University)

Abstract

Ethnic exclusion by the regimes has consistently been a setback to nation-building in Kenya since it became an independent state in 1963. This has led to inequality in the society, political instability, and fragmentation of the society since each administration has been inclined towards a certain ethnic group. These exclusionary practices have a history of being in existence as a result of colonial legacies even after the democracy reforms such as the 2010 Constitution had an impact on governance, the level of trust among people and the development of the nation. The main objective of the study was to examine the dynamics of ethnic inclusivism efforts and ethnic exclusivism continuation under the Mwai Kibaki regime (2002-2013). The current study was grounded on two complementary theories namely; Ethnic identity and Political Patronage Theories. The Ethnic Identity Theory was utilized to describe the effect of ethnic affiliations on political alliances, voting patterns and resource access whereas the political patronage theory was used to describe how patronage affected the strain between attempts at ethnic inclusivism and ongoing ethnic exclusivism. This study employed a historical design as the study thoroughly examined how the regime-based ethnic exclusion affected the nation-building process in Kenya. The study used a qualitative approach based on the multi-dimensional political, historical, and social-cultural nature of ethnic exclusion. Open-ended interview schedules were also used to collect quantitative data, and it gave the respondents the freedom to discuss their responses. The study used both simple random and stratified sampling to achieve the desired sample that was representative of the diversity of Kenya in relation to ethnicity, region and professional

Suggested Citation

  • Ngaruiya Amos Kariuki & Gimode Atianyi Edwin & Otieno Isaiah Oduor, 2025. "Ethnic Inclusivism and Exclusivism in Kenya’s Politics: A Dialectical Analysis of the Mwai Kibaki Regime, 2002–2013," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 9(9), pages 6023-6031, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:bcp:journl:v:9:y:2025:issue-9:p:6023-6031
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/Digital-Library/volume-9-issue-9/6023-6031.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/articles/ethnic-inclusivism-and-exclusivism-in-kenyas-politics-a-dialectical-analysis-of-the-mwai-kibaki-regime-2002-2013/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Leonard Wantchekon, 2003. "Clientelism and voting behavior: Evidence from a field experiment in benin," Natural Field Experiments 00339, The Field Experiments Website.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gustavo J. Bobonis & Paul J. Gertler & Marco Gonzalez-Navarro & Simeon Nichter, 2022. "Vulnerability and Clientelism," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 112(11), pages 3627-3659, November.
    2. Nicole M. Mason & Thomas S. Jayne & Nicolas van de Walle, 2017. "The Political Economy of Fertilizer Subsidy Programs in Africa: Evidence from Zambia," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 99(3), pages 705-731.
    3. Grácio, Matilde & Vicente, Pedro C., 2021. "Information, get-out-the-vote messages, and peer influence: Causal effects on political behavior in Mozambique," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 151(C).
    4. Robert Akerlof & Hongyi Li & Jonathan Yeo, 2022. "Ruling the Roost: The Vicious Circle and the Emergence of Pecking Order," Discussion Papers 2023-03, School of Economics, The University of New South Wales.
    5. Hicken, Allen & Leider, Stephen & Ravanilla, Nico & Yang, Dean, 2018. "Temptation in vote-selling: Evidence from a field experiment in the Philippines," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 1-14.
    6. Robert Kubinec, 2018. "Patrons or Clients? Measuring and Experimentally Evaluating Political Connections of Firms in Morocco and Jordan," Working Papers 1280, Economic Research Forum, revised 26 Dec 2018.
    7. Catherine Ragasa & Cristina Alvarez-Mingote & Paul McNamara, 2024. "Bottom-Up Approaches and Decentralized Extension Structures for Improving Access to and Quality of Extension Services and Technology Adoption: Multi-level Analysis from Malawi," The European Journal of Development Research, Palgrave Macmillan;European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI), vol. 36(5), pages 1093-1146, October.
    8. Asongu Simplice, 2014. "The Evolving Debate on the Effect of Foreign Aid on Corruption and Institutions in Africa," Working Papers of the African Governance and Development Institute. 14/009, African Governance and Development Institute..
    9. Kenneth Shelton Aikins & Richard Ametefe, 2017. "Ethnic Factor and Politics in the Asuogyaman District of Ghana," SAGE Open, , vol. 7(3), pages 21582440177, July.
    10. Cristina Corduneanu-Huci & Michael T. Dorsch & Paul Maarek, 2017. "Learning to constrain: Political competition and randomized controlled trials in development," Thema Working Papers 2017-24, THEMA (Théorie Economique, Modélisation et Applications), CY Cergy-Paris University, ESSEC and CNRS.
    11. Samuel Adams & Kingsley S. Agomor, 2015. "Democratic politics and voting behaviour in Ghana," International Area Studies Review, Center for International Area Studies, Hankuk University of Foreign Studies, vol. 18(4), pages 365-381, December.
    12. Canen, Nathan & Ch, Rafael & Wantchekon, Leonard, 2023. "Political uncertainty and the forms of state capture," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    13. Gisselquist, Rachel & Niño-Zarazúa, Miguel, 2013. "What can experiments tell us about how to improve governance?," MPRA Paper 49300, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    14. Ebney Ayaj Rana & Mustafa Kamal, 2018. "Does Clientelism Affect Income Inequality? Evidence from Panel Data," Journal of Income Distribution, Ad libros publications inc., vol. 26(1), pages 1-24, March.
    15. Abhijit Banerjee & Nils Enevoldsen & Rohini Pande & Michael Walton, 2024. "Public Information Is an Incentive for Politicians: Experimental Evidence from Delhi Elections," American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, American Economic Association, vol. 16(3), pages 323-353, July.
    16. Ann-Sofie Isaksson & Dick Durevall, 2023. "Aid and institutions: Local effects of World Bank aid on perceived institutional quality in Africa," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 18(3), pages 523-551, July.
    17. Anindya Bhattacharya & Anirban Kar & Alita Nandi, 2016. "Local Institutional Structure and Clientelistic Access to Employment: The Case of MGNREGS in Three States of India," Working Papers id:11549, eSocialSciences.
    18. Gisselquist, Rachel & Niño-Zarazúa, Miguel, 2013. "What can experiments tell us about how to improve governance?," MPRA Paper 49300, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    19. Adrienne LeBas, 2017. "Who trusts? Ethnicity, integration, and attitudes toward elected officials in urban Nigeria," WIDER Working Paper Series 126, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    20. Nicolás Maloberti, 2019. "Markets in votes: Alienability, strict secrecy, and political clientelism," Politics, Philosophy & Economics, , vol. 18(2), pages 193-215, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bcp:journl:v:9:y:2025:issue-9:p:6023-6031. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dr. Pawan Verma (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.