IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bcp/journl/v9y2025issue-7p2572-2579.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Challenges of Implementing Remote Work in the Manufacturing Industry: The Conceptual Analysis using SWOT-AHP Model

Author

Listed:
  • Dean Nelson Mojolou

    (Faculty of Business, Economy, and Accountancy, Universiti Malaysia Sabah)

  • Faerozh Madli

    (Faculty of Business, Economy, and Accountancy, Universiti Malaysia Sabah)

  • Ferawati Usman

    (Fakultas Ekonomi, Universitas Borneo Tarakan)

  • Nurul Hidayat

    (Fakultas Ekonomi, Universitas Borneo Tarakan)

  • Masran Tamin

    (Faculty of Business, Economy, and Accountancy, Universiti Malaysia Sabah)

Abstract

Available online Remote work has revolutionized business operations across industries, yet its implementation in manufacturing presents unique challenges due to the sector’s physical and process-driven nature. This research analyzes the conceptual framework for implementing remote work in manufacturing environments, examining challenges and potential solutions. While approximately 65% of manufacturing companies have adopted some remote work, the extent varies significantly based on organizational capabilities and production complexity. The study identifies key challenges, including the physical nature of production processes, technological infrastructure requirements, cybersecurity concerns, communication barriers, and cultural resistance. Critical solutions encompass integrating Industry 4.0 technologies such as the Industrial Internet of Things (IIoT), automation systems, and digital twins, alongside robust cybersecurity measures and comprehensive training programs. The research indicates that successful implementation requires a hybrid operational model where certain functions are performed off-site through digital interfaces while maintaining critical on-site operations. The study will use SWOT-AHP analysis to analyze the key factors in the manufacturing industry. While the transformation presents significant challenges, manufacturers that successfully navigate this transition can achieve enhanced resilience, streamlined operations, and improved access to global talent. The study concludes that effective integration of remote work capabilities will become a crucial competitive advantage in the evolving manufacturing landscape.

Suggested Citation

  • Dean Nelson Mojolou & Faerozh Madli & Ferawati Usman & Nurul Hidayat & Masran Tamin, 2025. "The Challenges of Implementing Remote Work in the Manufacturing Industry: The Conceptual Analysis using SWOT-AHP Model," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 9(7), pages 2572-2579, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:bcp:journl:v:9:y:2025:issue-7:p:2572-2579
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/Digital-Library/volume-9-issue-7/2572-2579.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/articles/the-challenges-of-implementing-remote-work-in-the-manufacturing-industry-the-conceptual-analysis-using-swot-ahp-model/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kurttila, Mikko & Pesonen, Mauno & Kangas, Jyrki & Kajanus, Miika, 2000. "Utilizing the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) in SWOT analysis -- a hybrid method and its application to a forest-certification case," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 1(1), pages 41-52, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Li, Chengjiang & Negnevitsky, Michael & Wang, Xiaolin, 2020. "Prospective assessment of methanol vehicles in China using FANP-SWOT analysis," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 60-75.
    2. Francesco Tajani & Pierluigi Morano & Felicia Di Liddo & Ivana La Spina, 2025. "An evaluation methodological approach to support the definition of effective urban projects: A case study in the city of Rome (Italy)," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 33(1), pages 771-793, February.
    3. Nermin Kişi, 2019. "A Strategic Approach to Sustainable Tourism Development Using the A’WOT Hybrid Method: A Case Study of Zonguldak, Turkey," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-19, February.
    4. Gianluigi Cardone & Annalisa De Boni & Amira Jouini & Rocco Roma, 2018. "Innovations in table grape supply chain: economic and environmental sustainability and local policy instruments," Economia agro-alimentare, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 20(2), pages 145-167.
    5. Hamid Mohammad-Beigi & Jafar Nouri & Humman Liaghati, 2015. "Strategic Analysis of Bus Rapid Transit System in Improvement of Public Transportation: Case of Tehran, Iran," Modern Applied Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 9(9), pages 169-169, September.
    6. Madjid Tavana & Mariya Sodenkamp & Leena Suhl, 2010. "A soft multi-criteria decision analysis model with application to the European Union enlargement," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 181(1), pages 393-421, December.
    7. Gözaçan Nazlıcan & Lafci Çisem, 2020. "Evaluation of Key Performance Indicators of Logistics Firms," Logistics, Supply Chain, Sustainability and Global Challenges, Sciendo, vol. 11(1), pages 24-32, February.
    8. Collins Okello & Stefania Pindozzi & Salvatore Faugno & Lorenzo Boccia, 2014. "Appraising Bioenergy Alternatives in Uganda Using Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities and Threats (SWOT)-Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) and a Desirability Functions Approach," Energies, MDPI, vol. 7(3), pages 1-22, February.
    9. Ho, William, 2008. "Integrated analytic hierarchy process and its applications - A literature review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 186(1), pages 211-228, April.
    10. Uddin, Mohammad Nizam & Hossain, Mohammad Mosharraf & Chen, Yong & Siriwong, Wapakorn & Boonyanuphap, Jaruntorn, 2019. "Stakeholders' perception on indigenous community-based management of village common forests in Chittagong hill tracts, Bangladesh," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 102-112.
    11. Qiang Wang & Thomas Dogot & Yueling Yang & Jian Jiao & Boyang Shi & Changbin Yin, 2020. "From “Coal to Gas” to “Coal to Biomass”: The Strategic Choice of Social Capital in China," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-22, August.
    12. Sabina Kordana-Obuch & Michał Wojtoń & Mariusz Starzec & Beata Piotrowska, 2023. "Opportunities and Challenges for Research on Heat Recovery from Wastewater: Bibliometric and Strategic Analyses," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-36, September.
    13. Javier Mendoza Jiménez & Montserrat Hernández López & Susana Eva Franco Escobar, 2019. "Sustainable Public Procurement: From Law to Practice," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(22), pages 1-23, November.
    14. Xiangnan Fan & Yuning Cheng & Fangqi Tan & Tianyi Zhao, 2022. "Construction and Optimization of the Ecological Security Pattern in Liyang, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-28, September.
    15. Yang Yi & Chen Zhang & Jinqi Zhu & Yugang Zhang & Hao Sun & Hongzhang Kang, 2022. "Spatio-Temporal Evolution, Prediction and Optimization of LUCC Based on CA-Markov and InVEST Models: A Case Study of Mentougou District, Beijing," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(4), pages 1-23, February.
    16. Wang, Naijiang & Bao, Yeqing, 2011. "Modeling forest quality at stand level: A case study of loess plateau in China," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 13(6), pages 488-495, July.
    17. Masozera, Michel K. & Alavalapati, Janaki R.R. & Jacobson, Susan K. & Shrestha, Ram K., 2006. "Assessing the suitability of community-based management for the Nyungwe Forest Reserve, Rwanda," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 8(2), pages 206-216, March.
    18. Grošelj, Petra & Hodges, Donald G. & Zadnik Stirn, Lidija, 2016. "Participatory and multi-criteria analysis for forest (ecosystem) management: A case study of Pohorje, Slovenia," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 80-86.
    19. Sepehr Ghazinoory & Mansoureh Abdi & Mandana Azadegan-Mehr, 2010. "Swot Methodology: A State-of-the-Art Review for the Past, A Framework for the Future," Journal of Business Economics and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 12(1), pages 24-48, November.
    20. Kaoma, Mwansa & Gheewala, Shabbir H., 2021. "Evaluation of the enabling environment for the sustainable development of rural-based bioenergy systems in Zambia," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bcp:journl:v:9:y:2025:issue-7:p:2572-2579. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dr. Pawan Verma (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.