IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bcp/journl/v9y2025issue-4p2849-2865.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Environmental Sustainability Reporting and the Performance of Listed Consumer Goods Firms in Nigeria: The Moderating Effect of Firm Size

Author

Listed:
  • Nnedu, Stanley Chinonso

    (Accounting Department, Veritas University, Abuja, Nigeria)

  • Okpanachi, Joshua

    (Accounting Department, Nigerian Defence Academy, Kaduna, Nigeria)

  • Achema, Friday

    (Accounting Department, Veritas University, Abuja, Nigeria)

Abstract

This study examines the effect of environmental sustainability reporting (EVSR) on the financial performance of Nigerian consumer goods firms, with firm size as a moderating variable. Using an ex-post facto research design, secondary data from the annual and sustainability reports of 16 listed consumer goods firms on the Nigerian Exchange Group (2014–2023) were analyzed. The study employs panel data regression using STATA 17.0, with sales turnover as the dependent variable, environmental sustainability disclosure as the independent variable, and firm size as the moderating variable. Findings reveal a significant negative relationship between EVSR and sales turnover, indicating that firms engaging in sustainability reporting may experience short-term financial strain due to compliance costs and operational adjustments. However, firm size moderates this relationship positively, as larger firms leverage sustainability reporting to enhance stakeholder trust and market competitiveness. These results underscore the need for strategic sustainability adoption, particularly among smaller firms facing financial constraints. The study recommends government incentives, standardized reporting frameworks, and cost-effective sustainability strategies to support firms in balancing environmental responsibility with financial performance.

Suggested Citation

  • Nnedu, Stanley Chinonso & Okpanachi, Joshua & Achema, Friday, 2025. "Environmental Sustainability Reporting and the Performance of Listed Consumer Goods Firms in Nigeria: The Moderating Effect of Firm Size," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 9(4), pages 2849-2865, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:bcp:journl:v:9:y:2025:issue-4:p:2849-2865
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/Digital-Library/volume-9-issue-4/2849-2865.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/articles/environmental-sustainability-reporting-and-the-performance-of-listed-consumer-goods-firms-in-nigeria-the-moderating-effect-of-firm-size/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Michael C. Jensen, 2010. "Value Maximization, Stakeholder Theory, and the Corporate Objective Function," Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, Morgan Stanley, vol. 22(1), pages 32-42, January.
    2. Dang, Chongyu & (Frank) Li, Zhichuan & Yang, Chen, 2018. "Measuring firm size in empirical corporate finance," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 159-176.
    3. Thomas P. Lyon & John W. Maxwell, 2011. "Greenwash: Corporate Environmental Disclosure under Threat of Audit," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 20(1), pages 3-41, March.
    4. M. López & Arminda Garcia & Lazaro Rodriguez, 2007. "Sustainable Development and Corporate Performance: A Study Based on the Dow Jones Sustainability Index," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 75(3), pages 285-300, October.
    5. Phillips, Robert & Freeman, R. Edward & Wicks, Andrew C., 2003. "What Stakeholder Theory is Not," Business Ethics Quarterly, Cambridge University Press, vol. 13(4), pages 479-502, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bhandari, Avishek & Javakhadze, David, 2017. "Corporate social responsibility and capital allocation efficiency," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 354-377.
    2. Woon Leong Lin & Jo Ann Ho & Murali Sambasivan, 2018. "Impact of Corporate Political Activity on the Relationship Between Corporate Social Responsibility and Financial Performance: A Dynamic Panel Data Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-22, December.
    3. Mara Del Baldo, 2012. "Corporate social responsibility and corporate governance in Italian SMEs: the experience of some “spirited businesses”," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 16(1), pages 1-36, February.
    4. Yuan Ding & Thomas Jeanjean & Hervé Stolowy, 2013. "Accounting for Stakeholders or Shareholders? The Case of R&D Reporting," Post-Print hal-01002936, HAL.
    5. Fracarolli Nunes, Mauro & Lee Park, Camila & Shin, Hyunju, 2021. "Corporate social and environmental irresponsibilities in supply chains, contamination, and damage of intangible resources: A behavioural approach," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 241(C).
    6. Saurabh Mishra & Sachin Modi, 2013. "Positive and Negative Corporate Social Responsibility, Financial Leverage, and Idiosyncratic Risk," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 117(2), pages 431-448, October.
    7. Francesco Perrini & Angeloantonio Russo & Antonio Tencati & Clodia Vurro, 2011. "Deconstructing the Relationship Between Corporate Social and Financial Performance," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 102(1), pages 59-76, March.
    8. repec:hal:spmain:info:hdl:2441/7fsnj6af7v9ncrf76qn5p5on9e is not listed on IDEAS
    9. Anagnostopoulou, Seraina C. & Tsekrekos, Andrianos E. & Voulgaris, Georgios, 2021. "Accounting conservatism and corporate social responsibility," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 53(4).
    10. Walid Ben‐Amar & Breeda Comyns & Isabelle Martinez, 2024. "Firm commitments on climate change: Effects of science‐based targets on financial outcomes during the COVID‐19 crisis," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(8), pages 7768-7787, December.
    11. Jose-Luis Godos-Díez & Roberto Fernández-Gago & Laura Cabeza-García, 2015. "Business Education and Idealism as Determinants of Stakeholder Orientation," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 131(2), pages 439-452, October.
    12. Hong Yuh Ching & Fábio Gerab & Thiago Henrique Toste, 2017. "The Quality of Sustainability Reports and Corporate Financial Performance: Evidence From Brazilian Listed Companies," SAGE Open, , vol. 7(2), pages 21582440177, June.
    13. Rezaee, Zabihollah & Tuo, Ling, 2017. "Voluntary disclosure of non-financial information and its association with sustainability performance," Advances in accounting, Elsevier, vol. 39(C), pages 47-59.
    14. Allen Kaufman & Ernie Englander, 2011. "Behavioral Economics, Federalism, and the Triumph of Stakeholder Theory," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 102(3), pages 421-438, September.
    15. David Rönnegard & N. Craig Smith, 2024. "A Rawlsian Rule for Corporate Governance," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 190(2), pages 295-308, March.
    16. Seo, Kwanglim & Moon, Joonho & Lee, Seoki, 2015. "Synergy of corporate social responsibility and service quality for airlines: The moderating role of carrier type," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 126-134.
    17. Mohanasundaram, S. & Kasilingam, R., 2024. "The sustainability factor in asset pricing: Empirical evidence from the Indian market," The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 206-213.
    18. Wei, Cui & Zhou, Hang & Zhang, Xinrui & Ouyang, Shuang, 2025. "The dark side of digital transformation: Digital washing and accounting conservatism," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    19. Martínez-Ferrero, Jennifer & Prado-Lorenzo, José Manuel & Fernández-Fernández, José Miguel, 2013. "Responsabilidad social corporativa vs. responsabilidad contable," Revista de Contabilidad - Spanish Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 16(1), pages 32-45.
    20. Jeremy Hall & Stelvia Matos & Cooper Langford, 2008. "Social Exclusion and Transgenic Technology: The Case of Brazilian Agriculture," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 77(1), pages 45-63, January.
    21. Lite J. Nartey & Witold J. Henisz & Sinziana Dorobantu, 2023. "Reciprocity in Firm–Stakeholder Dialog: Timeliness, Valence, Richness, and Topicality," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 183(2), pages 429-451, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bcp:journl:v:9:y:2025:issue-4:p:2849-2865. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dr. Pawan Verma (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.