IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bcp/journl/v9y2025issue-4p2746-2761.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Element Needed in Constructing Engineering Formative Assessment Based on Well-Defined Problems (DP) for Accreditation: A Systematic Review

Author

Listed:
  • N. S. M. Aripen

    (Centre For Diploma Studies, Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia, Pagoh Higher Education Hub, 84600 Pagoh, Johor, Malaysia Faculty Of Technical And Vocational Education, Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia, 86400 Parit Raja, Batu Pahat, Johor, Malaysia)

  • N.S. Abdullah

    (Faculty Of Technical And Vocational Education, Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia, 86400 Parit Raja, Batu Pahat, Johor, Malaysia)

Abstract

Accreditation plays a critical role in engineering technology programme because it ensures that all graduates can pursue professional engineering qualifications and that the career choice for graduates is vast. Well-defined problems (DP) are one of the attributes in the Dublin Accord involved in the implementation of the engineering formative assessment to ensure a smooth process of accreditation. At the diploma level, Dublin Accord attributes are crucial for engineering technology programs. In Malaysia, programme outcome and Dublin Accord attributes must align with the course’s learning outcome per ETAC standards requirement. Embedding these attributes into the curriculum, especially for constructing the engineering formative assessment, can be complex and would depend on the educator’s involvement. However, constructing the formative assessment based on Dublin Accord attributes can be challenging as no specific guidelines are provided to the educator. Hence, studying the elements needed in constructing engineering formative assessments based on well-defined problems (DP) attributes is crucial, especially for accreditation purposes.

Suggested Citation

  • N. S. M. Aripen & N.S. Abdullah, 2025. "The Element Needed in Constructing Engineering Formative Assessment Based on Well-Defined Problems (DP) for Accreditation: A Systematic Review," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 9(4), pages 2746-2761, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:bcp:journl:v:9:y:2025:issue-4:p:2746-2761
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/Digital-Library/volume-9-issue-4/2746-2761.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/articles/the-element-needed-in-constructing-engineering-formative-assessment-based-on-well-defined-problems-dp-for-accreditation-a-systematic-review/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sascha Kraus & Matthias Breier & Sonia Dasí-Rodríguez, 2020. "The art of crafting a systematic literature review in entrepreneurship research," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 16(3), pages 1023-1042, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Maral Mahdad & Saeed Roshani, 2025. "The open innovation kaleidoscope: navigating pathways and overcoming failures," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 19(6), pages 1637-1668, June.
    2. Raffaele Trequattrini & Matteo Palmaccio & Mario Turco & Alberto Manzari, 2024. "The contribution of blockchain technologies to anti‐corruption practices: A systematic literature review," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(1), pages 4-18, January.
    3. Matthias Filser & Sascha Kraus & Matthias Breier & Ioanna Nenova & Kaisu Puumalainen, 2021. "Business model innovation: Identifying foundations and trajectories," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(2), pages 891-907, February.
    4. Gagan Deep Sharma & Sascha Kraus & Amogh Talan & Mrinalini Srivastava & Christina Theodoraki, 2024. "Navigating the storm: the SME way of tackling the pandemic crisis," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 63(1), pages 221-241, June.
    5. Stefano D’Angelo & Angelo Cavallo & Antonio Ghezzi & Francesco Di Lorenzo, 2024. "Understanding corporate entrepreneurship in the digital age: a review and research agenda," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 18(12), pages 3719-3774, December.
    6. Scheuer, Luca Joachim & Thaler, Julia, 2023. "How do dynamic capabilities affect performance? A systematic review of mediators," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 41(6), pages 914-931.
    7. Durán-Romero, Gemma & López, Ana M. & Beliaeva, Tatiana & Ferasso, Marcos & Garonne, Christophe & Jones, Paul, 2020. "Bridging the gap between circular economy and climate change mitigation policies through eco-innovations and Quintuple Helix Model," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    8. Das, Kallol & Patel, Jayesh D. & Sharma, Anuj & Shukla, Yupal, 2023. "Creativity in marketing: Examining the intellectual structure using scientometric analysis and topic modeling," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    9. Rosa Lombardi & Raffaele Trequattrini & Federico Schimperna & Myriam Cano-Rubio, 2021. "The Impact of Smart Technologies on theManagement and Strategic Control: A Structured Literature Review," MANAGEMENT CONTROL, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2021(suppl. 1), pages 11-30.
    10. Justin R. Hall & Selen Savas-Hall & Eric H. Shaw, 2023. "A deductive approach to a systematic review of entrepreneurship literature," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 73(3), pages 987-1016, September.
    11. Kifah Imara & Fahriye Altinay, 2021. "Integrating Education for Sustainable Development Competencies in Teacher Education," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-17, November.
    12. Perez-Vega, Rodrigo & Hopkinson, Paul & Singhal, Aishwarya & Mariani, Marcello M., 2022. "From CRM to social CRM: A bibliometric review and research agenda for consumer research," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 1-16.
    13. Mikel Alayo & Txomin Iturralde & Amaia Maseda & Gloria Aparicio, 2021. "Mapping family firm internationalization research: bibliometric and literature review," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 15(6), pages 1517-1560, August.
    14. Akshita Singh & Shailendra Kumar & Utkarsh Goel & Amar Johri, 2023. "Behavioural biases in real estate investment: a literature review and future research agenda," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-17, December.
    15. Md Ahsan Uddin Murad & Dilek Cetindamar & Subrata Chakraborty, 2022. "Identifying the Key Big Data Analytics Capabilities in Bangladesh’s Healthcare Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-21, June.
    16. Bansal, Sanchita & Singh, Shifali & Nangia, Priya, 2022. "Assessing the role of natural resource utilization in attaining select sustainable development goals in the era of digitalization," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    17. Allan Dênisson Soares Silva & Wesley Vieira Silva & Luciana Santos Costa Vieira Silva & Nicholas Joseph Tavares Cruz & Zhaohui Su & Claudimar Pereira Veiga, 2025. "Interdependence between supply chains and sustainable development: global insights from a systematic review," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 19(3), pages 931-962, March.
    18. Di Paola, Nadia & Chari, Simos & Iannacci, Federico & Kraus, Sascha, 2025. "Configurational theory in business and management research: Status quo and guidelines for the application of qualitative comparative analysis (QCA)," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 211(C).
    19. Alexandra Moritz & Joern H. Block & Fuad Morina, 2024. "Entrepreneurship in post-conflict countries: a literature review," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 18(10), pages 3025-3083, October.
    20. Kirsten Visser & Irina van Aalst, 2022. "Neighbourhood Factors in Children's Outdoor Play: A Systematic Literature Review," Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Royal Dutch Geographical Society KNAG, vol. 113(1), pages 80-95, February.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bcp:journl:v:9:y:2025:issue-4:p:2746-2761. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dr. Pawan Verma (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.