IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bcp/journl/v9y2025issue-14p610-618.html

Assessing the Impact of Service Quality, Perceived Usefulness, and Ease of Use on E-Filing Adoption: A Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) Perspective on Taxpayer Satisfaction and Compliance

Author

Listed:
  • Audilia Ersa Iramaidha

    (Department of Business Administration, Brawijaya University)

  • Kadarisman Hidayat

    (Department of Business Administration, Brawijaya University)

  • Agung Nugroho Luthfi Imam Fahrudi

    (Department of Business Administration, Brawijaya University)

  • Rosyid Nurrohman

    (Department of Business Administration, Mulawarman University)

Abstract

This research investigates the factors affecting tax compliance among individual taxpayers registered at the Singosari Regency Pratama Tax Service Office (TSO) by applying the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) introduced by Davis (1986), with additional variables of service quality and satisfaction. A quantitative research method is utilized, with data gathered through an online survey via Google Forms from 169 individual taxpayers. The collected data is analyzed using the SEM-PLS method with the support of SmartPLS 3.0 software. The results of this study can provide valuable insights for the Singosari Regency Pratama Tax Service Office (TSO) in improving tax compliance through the e-Filing system. The Technology Acceptance Model, derived from Davis’ framework, is widely used to assess technological adoption across various industries. This study applies TAM to examine how individual taxpayers at the Singosari Regency Pratama Tax Service Office (TSO) adopt electronic tax reporting systems. By incorporating TAM into the e-Filing system, this research aims to enhance system performance and user experience. Ultimately, taxpayer satisfaction with the e-Filing system plays a crucial role in increasing tax compliance. The results indicate that one hypothesis was found to be insignificant, namely the effect of perceived ease of use on information system adoption. This is evidenced by a t-statistic value of 0.543, which is lower than the threshold of 1.96, and a p-value of 0.587, which exceeds the significance level of 0.08. This suggests that ease of use is not a key factor in e-Filing adoption, as its usage is more influenced by service quality and perceived usefulness. The segmentation of respondents based on demographic factors such as age and digital literacy is recommended for future studies. Additionally, the study acknowledges its limitations, including potential sampling bias, which should be addressed in subsequent research.

Suggested Citation

  • Audilia Ersa Iramaidha & Kadarisman Hidayat & Agung Nugroho Luthfi Imam Fahrudi & Rosyid Nurrohman, 2025. "Assessing the Impact of Service Quality, Perceived Usefulness, and Ease of Use on E-Filing Adoption: A Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) Perspective on Taxpayer Satisfaction and Compliance," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 9(14), pages 610-618, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:bcp:journl:v:9:y:2025:issue-14:p:610-618
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/Digital-Library/volume-9-issue-14/610-618.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/articles/assessing-the-impact-of-service-quality-perceived-usefulness-and-ease-of-use-on-e-filing-adoption-a-technology-acceptance-model-tam-perspective-on-taxpayer-satisfaction-and-compliance/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Doddy Setiawan & Bobby Kurniawan & Payamta Payamta, 2018. "Dampak penggunaan e-filling terhadap kepatuhan wajib pajak: peran perilaku wajib pajak sebagai variabel mediasi," Jurnal Akuntansi dan Auditing Indonesia, Accounting Department, Faculty of Business and Economics, Universitas Islam Indonesia, vol. 22(1), pages 12-24.
    2. repec:uii:jaaife:v:22:y:2018:i:1:p:12-24 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. James, Simon & Alley, Clinton, 2002. "Tax compliance, self-assessment and tax administration," MPRA Paper 26906, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    4. Rowley, Jennifer, 2011. "e-Government stakeholders—Who are they and what do they want?," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 31(1), pages 53-62.
    5. Weerakkody, Vishanth & El-Haddadeh, Ramzi & Al-Sobhi, Faris & Shareef, Mahmud Akhter & Dwivedi, Yogesh K., 2013. "Examining the influence of intermediaries in facilitating e-government adoption: An empirical investigation," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 33(5), pages 716-725.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Agumas Alamirew Mebratu, 2024. "Theoretical foundations of voluntary tax compliance: evidence from a developing country," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-8, December.
    2. Sangjae Lee & Byung Gon Kim, 2025. "Factors Affecting the Intention to Use Blockchain: A Technology Acceptance Perspective," SAGE Open, , vol. 15(4), pages 21582440251, November.
    3. repec:eur:ejesjr:373 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Şebnem Çoban & Sami Fethi & Cem Tanova & Ogechi Obaegbulam, 2024. "Adoption of e-Government Services in the Northern Part of Cyprus: The Role of Blockchain Technology Awareness," SAGE Open, , vol. 14(4), pages 21582440241, October.
    5. Carolina Pontones-Rosa & Rosario Perez-Morote & Montserrat Nunez-Chicharro & Inmaculada Alonso-Carrillo, 2023. "E-government in Depopulated Rural Areas. An Approach to the Reality of Spanish Municipalities," Population Research and Policy Review, Springer;Southern Demographic Association (SDA), vol. 42(4), pages 1-34, August.
    6. Liu, Bofan & Guo, Ruifei & Shi, Huaqin, 2025. "Digital government and corporate investment: Effects and mechanisms," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 151(C).
    7. Aladwani, Adel M., 2016. "Corruption as a source of e-Government projects failure in developing countries: A theoretical exposition," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 36(1), pages 105-112.
    8. Queiroz, Maciel M. & Fosso Wamba, Samuel, 2019. "Blockchain adoption challenges in supply chain: An empirical investigation of the main drivers in India and the USA," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 70-82.
    9. Kirchler, Erich & Wahl, Ingrid, 2010. "Tax compliance inventory TAX-I: Designing an inventory for surveys of tax compliance," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 31(3), pages 331-346, June.
    10. Koroseczné Pavlin Rita & Parádi-Dolgos Anett & Koponicsné Györke Diána, 2019. "The effects of employment policy measures on the labour demand of persons with changed working abilities," Acta Universitatis Sapientiae, Economics and Business, Sciendo, vol. 7(1), pages 37-46, December.
    11. Wiwiek Prihandini, 2018. "The Optimum Level of Tax Compliance Based on Power of Authority and Trust in an Antagonistic Climate," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(1), pages 362-373.
    12. Egidijus Bikas & Greta Bagdonaitė, 2020. "Tax avoidance: the aspect of value added tax," Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 8(2), pages 590-605, December.
    13. Vanina Adoriana Trifan & Silviu Gabriel Szentesi & Lavinia Denisia Cuc & Mioara Florina Pantea, 2023. "Assessing Tax Compliance Behavior Among Romanian Taxpayers: An Empirical Case Study," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(3), pages 21582440231, September.
    14. Thomas Appiah & Daniel Domeher & Joseph Akadeagre Agana, 2024. "Tax Knowledge, Trust in Government, and Voluntary Tax Compliance: Insights From an Emerging Economy," SAGE Open, , vol. 14(2), pages 21582440241, April.
    15. Larissa M. Batrancea & Anca Nichita & Ruggero Agostini & Fabricio Batista Narcizo & Denis Forte & Samuel Paiva Neves Mamede & Ana Maria Roux-Cesar & Bozhidar Nedev & Leoš Vitek & József Pántya & Aidin, 2022. "A self-employed taxpayer experimental study on trust, power, and tax compliance in eleven countries," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 8(1), pages 1-23, December.
    16. Lian, Jiunn-Woei, 2015. "Critical factors for cloud based e-invoice service adoption in Taiwan: An empirical study," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 35(1), pages 98-109.
    17. Fadi Alasfour, 2019. "Costs of Distrust: The Virtuous Cycle of Tax Compliance in Jordan," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 155(1), pages 243-258, March.
    18. Anamaria-Geanina MACOVEI & Mihaela TULVINSCHI, 2020. "Econometric Analysis Of The Evolution Of Vat In Romania And Of The Directions To Follow For A Sustainable Economy," European Journal of Accounting, Finance & Business, "Stefan cel Mare" University of Suceava, Romania - Faculty of Economics and Public Administration, West University of Timisoara, Romania - Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, vol. 14(24), pages 110-117, October.
    19. Siglé, Maarten A. & Goslinga, Sjoerd & Speklé, Roland F. & van der Hel, Lisette E.C.J.M., 2022. "The cooperative approach to corporate tax compliance: An empirical assessment," Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, Elsevier, vol. 46(C).
    20. Mardhiah Mardhiah & Riyana Miranti & Robert Tanton, 2019. "The Slippery Slope Framework: Extending the Analysis by Investigating Factors Affecting Trust and Power," CESifo Working Paper Series 7494, CESifo.
    21. Batrancea, Larissa M. & Kudła, Janusz & Błaszczak, Barbara & Kopyt, Mateusz, 2022. "Differences in tax evasion attitudes between students and entrepreneurs under the slippery slope framework," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 200(C), pages 464-482.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bcp:journl:v:9:y:2025:issue-14:p:610-618. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dr. Pawan Verma (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.