IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bcp/journl/v8y2024i12p491-505.html

Bibliometric Analysis of Published Literature on Women’s Rights from Islamic Perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Mohammed R. M. Elshobake

    (Assistant Professor, Civil Law Department, Ahmad Ibrahim Kulliyyah of Laws, International Islamic University Malaysia,)

Abstract

Research on women’s rights from an Islamic perspective in the Scopus database was initiated in 1979, which discussed the role of women of the Muslim Hausa tribe in Nigeria. Since then, the research in that field has been increasingly used by researchers to examine further issues related to women’s rights from an Islamic perspective. The study aims to explore the published literature related to the topic of “women’s rights from an Islamic perspective†. The Scopus database was used to collect all relevant articles. Publish or perish was used to incorporate the obtained data, VOSviewer to visualize the data, and Microsoft Excel to examine the collected data. Standard bibliometric analysis was used to offer full information on the increase of publications, research output, and citation analysis. According to research findings, a total of 484 documents were retrieved. It was discovered that there was no gap in publications since 2000 and the annual growth rate of published material on women’s rights from an Islamic perspective has grown since 2006. Most of the articles were published in journals, mainly in English, with most of the research on women’s rights from an Islamic perspective being in the Social Sciences field. “Women’s Rights†, “Islam†and “Human Rights†were the most popular keywords and represent the primary study areas comprised in the topic of women’s rights from an Islamic perspective. Many the research related to the study field was conducted in the United States and the United Kingdom. This study shows the development of published literature on women’s rights from an Islamic perspective, the subjects related to women’s rights from an Islamic perspective in which researchers are currently interested, as well as possible directions for future research on the study field.

Suggested Citation

  • Mohammed R. M. Elshobake, 2024. "Bibliometric Analysis of Published Literature on Women’s Rights from Islamic Perspective," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 8(12), pages 491-505, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:bcp:journl:v:8:y:2024:i:12:p:491-505
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/Digital-Library/volume-8-issue-12/491-505.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/articles/bibliometric-analysis-of-published-literature-on-womens-rights-from-islamic-perspective/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Andrea Diem & Stefan C. Wolter, 2011. "The Use of Bibliometrics to Measure Research Performance in Education Sciences," Economics of Education Working Paper Series 0066, University of Zurich, Department of Business Administration (IBW), revised May 2013.
    2. Gautam Sharma, 2021. "The Makerspace Phenomenon: A Bibliometric Review of Literature (2012–2020)," International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management (IJITM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 18(03), pages 1-16, May.
    3. Shahram Akbarzadeh & Rebecca Barlow & Sanaz Nasirpour, 2021. "Registered NGOs and advocacy for women in Iran," Third World Quarterly, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 42(7), pages 1475-1488, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wu, Jiang & Ou, Guiyan & Liu, Xiaohui & Dong, Ke, 2022. "How does academic education background affect top researchers’ performance? Evidence from the field of artificial intelligence," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 16(2).
    2. Olga Pilipczuk, 2022. "Building the Cognitive Enterprise in the Energy Sector," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(24), pages 1-13, December.
    3. Bayissa Badada Badassa & Baiqing Sun & Lixin Qiao, 2020. "Sustainable Transport Infrastructure and Economic Returns: A Bibliometric and Visualization Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-24, March.
    4. Thanh Trung Pham & Thi Thanh Do & Manh Tien Vu, 2026. "Methods and Trends in Higher Education Research: Bibliographic Analysis," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 10(26), pages 1243-1255, January.
    5. José Álvarez-García & Amador Durán-Sánchez & María de la Cruz del Río-Rama & Ronny Correa-Quezada, 2019. "Older Adults and Digital Society: Scientific Coverage," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-16, June.
    6. Lukas D. Filser & Fábio Francisco Silva & Otávio José Oliveira, 2017. "State of research and future research tendencies in lean healthcare: a bibliometric analysis," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 112(2), pages 799-816, August.
    7. Alona Zharova & Janine Tellinger-Rice & Wolfgang Karl Härdle, 2018. "How to measure the performance of a Collaborative Research Center," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 117(2), pages 1023-1040, November.
    8. Kumar, Laveet & Sleiti, Ahmad K., 2025. "A comprehensive review of hydrogen safety through a metadata analysis framework," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 214(C).
    9. repec:hum:wpaper:sfb649dp2018-001 is not listed on IDEAS
    10. Yi Zhang & Mingting Kou & Kaihua Chen & Jiancheng Guan & Yuchen Li, 2016. "Modelling the Basic Research Competitiveness Index (BR-CI) with an application to the biomass energy field," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 108(3), pages 1221-1241, September.
    11. Adela Laura Popa & Naiana Nicoleta Ţarcă & Dinu Vlad Sasu & Simona Aurelia Bodog & Remus Dorel Roşca & Teodora Mihaela Tarcza, 2022. "Exploring Marketing Insights for Healthcare: Trends and Perspectives Based on Literature Investigation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-21, August.
    12. Gerhard Reichmann & Christian Schlögl, 2022. "On the possibilities of presenting the research performance of an institute over a long period of time: the case of the Institute of Information Science at the University of Graz in Austria," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 127(6), pages 3193-3223, June.
    13. Akhmat, Ghulam & Zaman, Khalid & Shukui, Tan & Javed, Yasir & Khan, Muhammad Mushtaq, 2014. "Relationship between educational indicators and research outcomes in a panel of top twenty nations: Windows of opportunity," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 8(2), pages 349-361.
    14. Lingjie Tang & Chang’an Zhang, 2023. "Global Research on International Students’ Intercultural Adaptation in a Foreign Context: A Visualized Bibliometric Analysis of the Scientific Landscape," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(4), pages 21582440231, December.
    15. Gorupec Natalia & Brehmer Nataliia & Tiberius Victor & Kraus Sascha, 2022. "Tackling uncertain future scenarios with real options: A review and research framework," The Irish Journal of Management, Sciendo, vol. 41(1), pages 69-88, July.
    16. Rørstad, Kristoffer & Aksnes, Dag W., 2015. "Publication rate expressed by age, gender and academic position – A large-scale analysis of Norwegian academic staff," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 9(2), pages 317-333.
    17. Kumar, Laveet & Sleiti, Ahmad K., 2024. "Systematic review on ammonia as a sustainable fuel for combustion," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 202(C).
    18. Fernando J. Garrigos-Simon & Yeamduan Narangajavana-Kaosiri & Ismael Lengua-Lengua, 2018. "Tourism and Sustainability: A Bibliometric and Visualization Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-23, June.
    19. Thomas E. Smith & Kat S. Jacobs & Philip J. Osteen & T. Edison Carter, 2018. "Comparing the research productivity of social work doctoral programs using the h-Index," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 116(3), pages 1513-1530, September.
    20. Lutz Bornmann, 2024. "Skewed distributions of scientists’ productivity: a research program for the empirical analysis," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 129(4), pages 2455-2468, April.
    21. Zharova, Alona & Härdle, Wolfgang Karl & Lessmann, Stefan, 2017. "Is scientific performance a function of funds?," SFB 649 Discussion Papers 2017-028, Humboldt University Berlin, Collaborative Research Center 649: Economic Risk.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bcp:journl:v:8:y:2024:i:12:p:491-505. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dr. Pawan Verma (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.