IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bcp/journl/v5y2021i09p844-851.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Implementation and Efficiency of One Door Integrated Services as Public Administration Reform at the Central Jakarta State Court Class 1A Special

Author

Listed:
  • Resha Agriansyah

    (Student of Doctoral Program of Social Sciences Study Program, Postgraduate Tadulako University)

  • Muhammad Basir-Cyio

    (Lecturer of the Doctoral Program of the Social Sciences Study Program, Postgraduate Tadulako Universitas University)

  • Muhammad Nur Ali

    (Lecturer of the Doctoral Program of the Social Sciences Study Program, Postgraduate Tadulako Universitas University)

Abstract

This study aims to determine the nature of public administration reform and the implementation and efficiency of the One-Stop Integrated (PTSP) in the Central Jakarta District Court Class 1A Special. Using a qualitative method with a descriptive analysis approach, the authors explore the data through observation, interviews, and documentation studies. The interview process was carried out to twenty-six informants, while data processing and analysis were carried out in three stages: data reduction, data display, and data verification. The results showed that 1)The essence of the application of PTSP at the Central Jakarta District Court is to create an integrated form of service to realize a service process that is fast, easy, transparent, measurable following predetermined standards in a unified process starting from the initial stage to the stage of completion of service products through one door. ; 2) implementation PTSP at the Central Jakarta District Court Class 1A Special as a form of public administration reform has been running well and effectively in integrated services to realize a service process that is fast, easy, transparent, measurable following standards. The power or efficiency of PTSPCentral Jakarta District Court Class 1A Special as a form of public administration reform is following 3 (three) principal indicators of the Good Governance Bappenas 2005, and the fourth indicator is optimal resources which are divided into two criteria, namely criteria for using technology based on PTSP SOPs and interviews the informants indicate that they have been met, while the human resource criteria based on the PTSP SOP and interviews with informants suggest that they have not been achieved or have not been met.

Suggested Citation

  • Resha Agriansyah & Muhammad Basir-Cyio & Muhammad Nur Ali, 2021. "The Implementation and Efficiency of One Door Integrated Services as Public Administration Reform at the Central Jakarta State Court Class 1A Special," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 5(09), pages 844-851, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:bcp:journl:v:5:y:2021:i:09:p:844-851
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/Digital-Library/volume-5-issue-9/844-851.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://rsisinternational.org/virtual-library/papers/the-implementation-and-efficiency-of-one-door-integrated-services-as-public-administration-reform-at-the-central-jakarta-state-court-class-1a-special/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Braune, Eric & Sahut, Jean-Michel & Teulon, Fréderic, 2020. "Intangible capital, governance and financial performance," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    2. Abbink, Klaus & Wu, Kevin, 2017. "Reward self-reporting to deter corruption: An experiment on mitigating collusive bribery," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 256-272.
    3. Erbaugh, James T. & Nurrochmat, Dodik R., 2019. "Paradigm shift and business as usual through policy layering: Forest-related policy change in Indonesia (1999-2016)," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 136-146.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Moeliono, Moira & Brockhaus, Maria & Gallemore, Caleb & Dwisatrio, Bimo & Maharani, Cynthia D. & Muharrom, Efrian & Pham, Thuy Thu, 2020. "REDD+ in Indonesia: A new mode of governance or just another project?," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 121(C).
    2. Pedro Naso & Erwin Bulte & Tim Swanson, 2017. "Can there be benefits from competing legal regimes? The impact of legal pluralism in post-conflict Sierra Leone," CIES Research Paper series 56-2017, Centre for International Environmental Studies, The Graduate Institute.
    3. Charles Angelucci & Antonio Russo, 2022. "Petty Corruption And Citizen Reports," International Economic Review, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania and Osaka University Institute of Social and Economic Research Association, vol. 63(2), pages 831-848, May.
    4. Dmitriy Knyazev, 2023. "How to fight corruption: Carrots and sticks," Economic Inquiry, Western Economic Association International, vol. 61(2), pages 413-429, April.
    5. Nyreröd, Theo & Spagnolo, Giancarlo, 2017. "Myths and Numbers on Whistleblower Rewards," SITE Working Paper Series 44, Stockholm School of Economics, Stockholm Institute of Transition Economics, revised 27 Apr 2018.
    6. Peiyao Shen & Regina Betz & Andreas Ortmann & Rukai Gong, 2020. "Improving Truthful Reporting of Polluting Firms by Rotating Inspectors: Experimental Evidence from a Bribery Game," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 76(2), pages 201-233, July.
    7. Jun Hu, 2021. "Asymmetric punishment, Leniency and Harassment Bribes in China: a selective survey," Working Papers hal-03119491, HAL.
    8. Perrotta Berlin, Maria & Spagnolo, Giancarlo & Qin, Bei, 2015. "Leniency, Asymmetric Punishment and Corruption: Evidence from China," SITE Working Paper Series 34, Stockholm School of Economics, Stockholm Institute of Transition Economics, revised 25 May 2017.
    9. Paolo Buccirossi & Giovanni Immordino & Giancarlo Spagnolo, 2021. "Whistleblower rewards, false reports, and corporate fraud," European Journal of Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 51(3), pages 411-431, June.
    10. Shuguang Jiang & Marie Claire Villeval, 2022. "Dishonesty in Developing Countries -What Can We Learn From Experiments?," Working Papers hal-03899654, HAL.
    11. Jeffrey V. Butler & Danila Serra & Giancarlo Spagnolo, 2017. "Motivating Whistleblowers," CEIS Research Paper 419, Tor Vergata University, CEIS, revised 12 Dec 2017.
    12. Buckenmaier, Johannes & Dimant, Eugen & Mittone, Luigi, 2020. "Effects of institutional history and leniency on collusive corruption and tax evasion," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 175(C), pages 296-313.
    13. Raymundo M. Campos-Vazquez & Luis A. Mejia, 2016. "Does corruption affect cooperation? A laboratory experiment," Latin American Economic Review, Springer;Centro de Investigaciòn y Docencia Económica (CIDE), vol. 25(1), pages 1-19, December.
    14. Andreas C. Drichoutis & Veronika Grimm & Alexandros Karakostas, 2020. "Bribing to Queue-Jump: An experiment on cultural differences in bribing attitudes among Greeks and Germans," Working Papers 2020-2, Agricultural University of Athens, Department Of Agricultural Economics.
    15. Yuan Li & Wilfrid Azan, 2023. "Scientific knowledge production of blockchain: A bibliometric and lexicometric review," Post-Print hal-04180011, HAL.
    16. Erbaugh, James T., 2019. "Responsibilization and social forestry in Indonesia," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    17. Feess, Eberhard & Sarel, Roee, 2022. "Optimal fine reductions for self-reporting: The impact of loss aversion," International Review of Law and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    18. Theo Nyreröd & Giancarlo Spagnolo, 2021. "Myths and numbers on whistleblower rewards," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 15(1), pages 82-97, January.
    19. Gennady Vasilievich Osipov & Vladimir Ivanovich Glotov & Svetlana Gennadievna Karepova, 2018. "Population in the shadow market: petty corruption and unpaid taxes," Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 6(2), pages 692-710, December.
    20. Hans J. Czap & Natalia V. Czap, 2019. "‘I Gave You More’: Discretionary Power in a Corruption Experiment," Journal of Interdisciplinary Economics, , vol. 32(2), pages 200-217, July.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bcp:journl:v:5:y:2021:i:09:p:844-851. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dr. Pawan Verma (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.