IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bco/mbrqaa/v28y2023p1-16.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Clear or Real? The Transformation of a Japanese Business Group: How Does Ambiguity Produce Knowledge?

Author

Listed:
  • Zsuzsanna Járfás

    (Babes-Bolyai University, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Department of Marketing, Cluj-Napoca, Romania)

Abstract

This study examines the sources of continuity and change in complex organizations characterized by multiple embeddedness. The case is built on a vertical business group of Japan’s shipping industry. In a grounded study, sampling was performed in collaboration with HR and, simultaneous data collection/analysis conducted by the author. Semi-structured interviews took place with middle and top managers in the Tokyo HQ and the London subsidiary across June and July, 2019. As a result, it is argued that ambiguity is systemically inherent in organizations – notably in business groups. Ambiguity is explicated as a knowledge production unit that possesses a structure/process duality. As structure, it upholds and reinforces the dominant logic by 1) defining the moment of truth: membership criteria, control matrix, allocation of resources, norms and standards, desired behaviors, activities etc. and, by 2) control and coordination: delineates the scope of allowed informal action, allocates time, space, processes to perform these. As a process, ambiguity is manifest in the autonomous informal action of socialized and acculturated actors. The integration of informally understood and formally codified structures and processes is found effective to sustain the status quo and, to provide for adaptive continuity: ambiguity’s utility reaches as far as facilitating and reinforcing implementation. The paradox of ambiguity’s inertial and constructive aspect is dissolved in a duality which is mobilized by the organizing purpose requiring action; inertia for stability and, its active aspect to attain continuity. Practical implications: management knowledge has overly emphasized clarity and has regarded ambiguity as a risk; a problem to be clarified. Ambiguity, however, is social control & coordination that can be integrated in the formal organization; culture and identity are often more effective than explicit controls in buying support from members for organizational goals and implementing these.

Suggested Citation

  • Zsuzsanna Járfás, 2023. "Clear or Real? The Transformation of a Japanese Business Group: How Does Ambiguity Produce Knowledge?," European Journal of Studies in Management and Business, EUROKD, vol. 28, pages 1-16.
  • Handle: RePEc:bco:mbrqaa::v:28:y:2023:p:1-16
    DOI: 10.32038/mbrq.2023.28.01
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://api.eurokd.com/Uploads/Article/880/mbrq.2023.28.01.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.32038/mbrq.2023.28.01?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chahrazad Abdallah & Ann Langley, 2014. "The Double Edge of Ambiguity in Strategic Planning," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 51(2), pages 235-264, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gary T. Burke & Carola Wolf, 2021. "The Process Affordances of Strategy Toolmaking when Addressing Wicked Problems," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 58(2), pages 359-388, March.
    2. Julia VINCENT PONROY & Patrick LÊ & Camille PRADIES, 2019. "In a Family Way? A Model of Family Firm Identity Maintenance by Non-Family Members," Working Papers 2019-015, Department of Research, Ipag Business School.
    3. Marc Fréchet & Hervé Goy, 2017. "Does strategy formalization foster innovation? Evidence from a French sample of small to medium-sized enterprises," Post-Print hal-01623788, HAL.
    4. Rogerio Morais & José Dirnece Tavares Paes, 2020. "Analysis Of Factors Supporting Swot In Organizational Strategic Planning," Management Strategies Journal, Constantin Brancoveanu University, vol. 48(2), pages 38-51.
    5. Alex Wright, 2022. "I, strategist," Post-Print hal-04577428, HAL.
    6. Paul Knott & Chatchai Thnarudee, 2022. "Strategic planning as inter-unit coordination: An in depth case study in Thailand," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 39(1), pages 201-224, March.
    7. Charis Vlados & Dimos Chatzinikolaou, 2019. "Strategy Perception and Implementation on Less Developed Business Ecosystems Micro and Small Enterprises: The Service Sector of Eastern Macedonia and Thrace," Business Management and Strategy, Macrothink Institute, vol. 10(2), pages 27-63, December.
    8. Schuler, Benedikt Alexander & Orr, Kevin & Hughes, Jeffrey, 2023. "My colleagues (do not) think the same: Middle managers’ shared and separate realities in strategy implementation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    9. Gazi Islam & Marie Holm & Mira Karjalainen, 2022. "Sign of the times: Workplace mindfulness as an empty signifier," Post-Print halshs-01958800, HAL.
    10. Marion Varlet & Florence Allard-Poesi, 2015. "Les Conditions de Performativité du Discours Stratégique Analyses et apports d'Austin, Searle, Butler et Callon," Post-Print hal-01490627, HAL.
    11. Shameen Prashantham & Mark P. Healey, 2022. "Strategy as Practice Research: Reflections on its Rationale, Approach, and Contributions," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 59(8), pages 1-17, December.
    12. Md. Abdul Kaium Masud & Md. Harun Ur Rashid & Tehmina Khan & Seong Mi Bae & Jong Dae Kim, 2019. "Organizational Strategy and Corporate Social Responsibility: The Mediating Effect of Triple Bottom Line," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(22), pages 1-18, November.
    13. Kirsti Malkamäki & Esa Hiltunen & Eeva Aromaa, 2021. "The Role of Trust in the Strategic Management Process: A Case Study of Finnish Grocery Retail Company Kesko Ltd," South Asian Journal of Business and Management Cases, , vol. 10(1), pages 21-34, April.
    14. Charlotte Croft & Gerry McGivern & Graeme Currie & Andy Lockett & Dimitrios Spyridonidis, 2022. "Unified Divergence and the Development of Collective Leadership," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 59(2), pages 460-488, March.
    15. Kari Jalonen & Henri Schildt & Eero Vaara, 2018. "Strategic concepts as micro‐level tools in strategic sensemaking," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(10), pages 2794-2826, October.
    16. Devereux, Luke & Melewar, T.C. & Dinnie, Keith & Lange, Thomas, 2020. "Corporate identity orientation and disorientation: A complexity theory perspective," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 413-424.
    17. Mohamed Laid Ouakouak, 2018. "Does a strategic planning process that combines rational and adaptive characteristics pay off ? Evidence from European firms," Australian Journal of Management, Australian School of Business, vol. 43(2), pages 328-349, May.
    18. Virpi Sorsa & Eero Vaara, 2020. "How Can Pluralistic Organizations Proceed with Strategic Change? A Processual Account of Rhetorical Contestation, Convergence, and Partial Agreement in a Nordic City Organization," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 31(4), pages 839-864, July.
    19. Kari Jalonen & Henri A. Schildt & Eero Vaara, 2018. "Strategic concepts as micro‐level tools in strategic sensemaking," Post-Print hal-02312245, HAL.
    20. Lund, Anne Kamilla, 2019. "Leading knowledge-workers through situated ambiguity," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 35(3).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bco:mbrqaa::v:28:y:2023:p:1-16. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sara Gunen (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.