IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bco/mbrqaa/v17y2021p31-43.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Study on the Workplace-related Corporate Social Responsibility Practices

Author

Listed:
  • Teodora A. Gorski

    (The KPI Institute, MENA, Dubai, UAE)

  • Hortensia Gorski

    (†Nicolae Balcescu" Land Forces Academy of Sibiu, Romania)

Abstract

This paper aims to explore the challenges regarding the workplace area of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR). Nowadays, organisations and their leaders are facing unprecedented pressures from both internal and external forces. Furthermore, there is a growing interest in understanding and managing issues related to sustainability. In these circumstances, organisations, regardless of their field of activity, have to implement responsible ways of doing business. Most CSR research focuses primarily on external areas: marketplace, environment, community, and external stakeholders: customers, suppliers, investors, government. Knowledge and digital economy and the fourth Industrial Revolution (4IR) greatly influence human capital. Today, there is fierce competition in attracting and retaining the best employees – as critical stakeholders. Recruiting, developing, utilising and retaining a talented workforce has become a critical success factor. In this context, it is crucial to explore the workplace as an internal dimension of CSR. Our research methodology includes a theoretical analysis based on literature regarding this topic and an online survey based on a questionnaire. The conclusions and solutions highlighted at the end of the paper can support Human Resource managers and business leaders in addressing these challenges and developing knowledge and skills to generate long†term value for businesses, society and the environment. We anticipate that our findings will shed more light on CSR workplace practices that can be integrated into the business sustainability strategy.

Suggested Citation

  • Teodora A. Gorski & Hortensia Gorski, 2021. "The Study on the Workplace-related Corporate Social Responsibility Practices," European Journal of Studies in Management and Business, EUROKD, vol. 17, pages 31-43.
    • Handle: RePEc:bco:mbrqaa::v:17:y:2021:p:31-43
    DOI: 10.32038/mbrq.2021.17.03
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://api.eurokd.com/Uploads/Article/403/mbrq.2021.17.03.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.32038/mbrq.2021.17.03?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Beringer, Claus & Jonas, Daniel & Kock, Alexander, 2013. "Behavior of Internal Stakeholders in Project Portfolio Management and Its Impact on Success," Publications of Darmstadt Technical University, Institute for Business Studies (BWL) 63280, Darmstadt Technical University, Department of Business Administration, Economics and Law, Institute for Business Studies (BWL).
    2. Yu Jia & Jinglu Yan & Tianyuan Liu & Jun Huang, 2019. "How Does Internal and External CSR Affect Employees’ Work Engagement? Exploring Multiple Mediation Mechanisms and Boundary Conditions," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(14), pages 1-17, July.
    3. Katarzyna Klimkiewicz & Victor Oltra, 2017. "Does CSR Enhance Employer Attractiveness? The Role of Millennial Job Seekers' Attitudes," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 24(5), pages 449-463, September.
    4. Duygu Turker, 2009. "How Corporate Social Responsibility Influences Organizational Commitment," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 89(2), pages 189-204, October.
    5. GORSKI Hortensia & FUCIU Mircea & DUMITRESCU Luigi, 2016. "Corporate Social Responsibility And Marketing Communication," Revista Economica, Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu, Faculty of Economic Sciences, vol. 68(2), pages 86-106, September.
    6. Shuili Du & C. B. Bhattacharya & Sankar Sen, 2011. "Corporate Social Responsibility and Competitive Advantage: Overcoming the Trust Barrier," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 57(9), pages 1528-1545, March.
    7. Beringer, Claus & Jonas, Daniel & Kock, Alexander, 2013. "Behavior of Internal Stakeholders in Project Portfolio Management and Its Impact on Success," Publications of Darmstadt Technical University, Institute for Business Studies (BWL) 63318, Darmstadt Technical University, Department of Business Administration, Economics and Law, Institute for Business Studies (BWL).
    8. Jennifer Goodman & Angelina Korsunova & Minna Halme, 2017. "Our Collaborative Future: Activities and Roles of Stakeholders in Sustainability‐Oriented Innovation," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 26(6), pages 731-753, September.
    9. Sharon Bolton & Rebecca Kim & Kevin O’Gorman, 2011. "Corporate Social Responsibility as a Dynamic Internal Organizational Process: A Case Study," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 101(1), pages 61-74, June.
    10. Chris Mason & John Simmons, 2014. "Embedding Corporate Social Responsibility in Corporate Governance: A Stakeholder Systems Approach," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 119(1), pages 77-86, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alejandro Alvarado-Herrera & Enrique Bigne & Joaquín Aldas-Manzano & Rafael Curras-Perez, 2017. "A Scale for Measuring Consumer Perceptions of Corporate Social Responsibility Following the Sustainable Development Paradigm," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 140(2), pages 243-262, January.
    2. Susanne Rank & Francoise Contreras, 2021. "Do Millennials pay attention to Corporate Social Responsibility in comparison to previous generations? Are they motivated to lead in times of transformation? A qualitative review of generations, CSR a," International Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility, Springer, vol. 6(1), pages 1-13, December.
    3. Eunice Kabahinda & Rogers Mwesigwa, 2023. "Trust Mediates the Relationship Between Stakeholder Behavior and Stakeholder Management of Public Private Partnership Projects in Uganda," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 23(1), pages 245-263, March.
    4. Swaen, Valérie & Demoulin, Nathalie & Pauwels-Delassus, Véronique, 2021. "Impact of customers’ perceptions regarding corporate social responsibility and irresponsibility in the grocery retailing industry: The role of corporate reputation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 709-721.
    5. Hermano, Víctor & Martín-Cruz, Natalia, 2016. "The role of top management involvement in firms performing projects: A dynamic capabilities approach," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(9), pages 3447-3458.
    6. A’ang Subiyakto & Abd. Rahman Ahlan & Syopiansyah Jaya Putra & Mira Kartiwi, 2015. "Validation of Information System Project Success Model," SAGE Open, , vol. 5(2), pages 21582440155, April.
    7. Ivy Hawah Taana, 2020. "A Conceptual Framework on The Successful Adoption of Project Management Methodologies in Ghana," Technium Social Sciences Journal, Technium Science, vol. 10(1), pages 409-422, August.
    8. Grama-Vigouroux, Simona & Saidi, Sana & Berthinier-Poncet, Anne & Vanhaverbeke, Wim & Madanamoothoo, Allane, 2020. "From closed to open: A comparative stakeholder approach for developing open innovation activities in SMEs," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 230-244.
    9. Pilar Fernández‐Ferrín & Sandra Castro‐González & Belén Bande, 2021. "Corporate social responsibility, emotions, and consumer loyalty in the food retail context: Exploring the moderating effect of regional identity," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(2), pages 648-666, March.
    10. Lea Wolf & Ronny Ehlen & Mona-Maria Bardmann & Caroline Ruiner & Julia Lanzl & Manfred Schoch & Henner Gimpel, 2024. "The role of internal CSR in guiding the digitalisation of work," International Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility, Springer, vol. 9(1), pages 1-17, December.
    11. Potdar, Balkrushna & Garry, Tony & McNeill, Lisa & Gnoth, Juergen & Pandey, Rakesh & Mansi, Mansi & Guthrie, John, 2020. "Retail employee guardianship behaviour: A phenomenological investigation," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 54(C).
    12. Mohammad Bilal Shaukat & Khawaja Fawad Latif & Aymen Sajjad & Gabriel Eweje, 2022. "Revisiting the relationship between sustainable project management and project success: The moderating role of stakeholder engagement and team building," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 30(1), pages 58-75, February.
    13. María Garrido‐Ruso & Beatriz Aibar‐Guzmán, 2022. "The moderating effect of contextual factors and employees' demographic features on the relationship between CSR and work‐related attitudes: A meta‐analysis," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(5), pages 1839-1854, September.
    14. Foroogh Ghasemi & Mohammad Hossein Mahmoudi Sari & Vahidreza Yousefi & Reza Falsafi & Jolanta Tamošaitienė, 2018. "Project Portfolio Risk Identification and Analysis, Considering Project Risk Interactions and Using Bayesian Networks," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-23, May.
    15. Aga, Deribe Assefa, 2016. "Factors affecting the success of development projects : A behavioral perspective," Other publications TiSEM 867ae95e-d53d-4a68-ad46-6, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    16. Soltani, Elham, 2020. "Business and project strategy alignment: ICT project success in Iran," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 63(C).
    17. Francesco Rosati & Roberta Costa & Armando Calabrese & Esben Rahbek Gjerdrum Pedersen, 2018. "Employee attitudes towards corporate social responsibility: a study on gender, age and educational level differences," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(6), pages 1306-1319, November.
    18. Laura Corazza & Dario Cottafava & Daniel Torchia & Amandeep Dhir, 2024. "Interpreting stakeholder ecosystems through relational stakeholder theory: The case of a highly contested megaproject," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(3), pages 2384-2412, March.
    19. Tian, Yuanyuan & Bai, Libiao & Wei, Lan & Zheng, Kanyin & Zhou, Xinyu, 2022. "Modeling for project portfolio benefit prediction via a GA-BP neural network," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 183(C).
    20. Ngoc Khuong Mai & Khoa Truong An Nguyen & Thanh Tung Do & Long Nhat Phan, 2023. "Corporate Social Responsibility Strategy Practices, Employee Commitment, Reputation as Sources of Competitive Advantage," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(4), pages 21582440231, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bco:mbrqaa::v:17:y:2021:p:31-43. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sara Gunen (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.