IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ate/journl/ajbev5i2-1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Interrelation between Manufacturing Productivity, Maximum Sectoral Employment and National Income Per Capita

Author

Listed:
  • Rainer Przywara

Abstract

According to the three-sector hypothesis, the national share of employees in the industrial sector will be shrinking after having reached a specific peak level. In line with societal development over time, the tipping point at which deindustrialization starts should be related to a certain income per capita. Predictions from literature showed an inverted-U relationship of manufacturing employment (%) over income per capita (log) for mature countries. By regression analysis, a universal tipping point at which deindustrialization starts was calculated. In this study, this theory was tested on a sample of 12 mature (high income, tipping by 1980) and 25 emerging (upper-middle income, later tipping) countries. No single standard function for all national economies was found, but certain paths related to the general state of economic development of national economies. The tipping point is moving over time, driven by increasing sectoral productivity. Productivity rises result in a shift over time towards higher income (x-axis) and lower relative employment (y-axis). In accordance with existing theory, the country-specific maximum of relative employment in manufacturing is reached at a certain threshold productivity, which again corresponds to a specific national income per capita. As a stylized fact, two falling linear functions of maximum manufacturing employment (%) over GDP per capita (log) were identified for mature and emerging countries. Their divide follows the international division of labour between highly-productive technology owners (mature countries) and less productive sub-suppliers (emerging countries). In addition, the critical manufacturing productivity at which maximum manufacturing employment is reached was analysed as a function of time (tipping year). Corresponding to the findings on the tipping point, the critical manufacturing productivity is rising over time. Two markedly separated rising linear functions for mature and emerging countries were identified.

Suggested Citation

  • Rainer Przywara, 2019. "The Interrelation between Manufacturing Productivity, Maximum Sectoral Employment and National Income Per Capita," Athens Journal of Business & Economics, Athens Institute for Education and Research (ATINER), vol. 5(2), pages 93-122, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:ate:journl:ajbev5i2-1
    DOI: 10.30958/ajbe.5-2-1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.athensjournals.gr/business/2019-5-2-1-Przywara.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.30958/ajbe.5-2-1?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sukti Dasgupta & Ajit Singh, 2006. "Manufacturing, Services and Premature De-Industrialisation in Developing Countries: A Kaldorian Empirical Analysis," Working Papers wp327, Centre for Business Research, University of Cambridge.
    2. W.F. Lever, 1991. "Deindustrialisation and the Reality of the Post-industrial City," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 28(6), pages 983-999, December.
    3. Rainer Przywara, 2017. "Deindustrialization - Opportunity or Threat?," Athens Journal of Business & Economics, Athens Institute for Education and Research (ATINER), vol. 3(4), pages 427-462, October.
    4. Jorge Bielsa & Rosa Duarte, 2011. "Size and linkages of the Spanish construction industry: key sector or deformation of the economy?," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 35(2), pages 317-334.
    5. Michael Kitson & Jonathan Michie, 2014. "The Deindustrial Revolution: The Rise & Fall of UK Manufacturing, 1870-2010," Working Papers wp459, Centre for Business Research, University of Cambridge.
    6. Sukti Dasgupta & Ajit Singh, 2006. "Manufacturing, Services and Premature Deindustrialization in Developing Countries: A Kaldorian Analysis," WIDER Working Paper Series RP2006-49, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    7. Backhouse, Roger E., 2002. "The Macroeconomics of Margaret Thatcher," Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Cambridge University Press, vol. 24(3), pages 313-334, September.
    8. Young, Allyn A., 1928. "Increasing Returns and Economic Progress," History of Economic Thought Articles, McMaster University Archive for the History of Economic Thought, vol. 38, pages 527-542.
    9. Pohl, Hans-Joachim, 1970. "Kritik der Drei-Sektoren-Theorie," Mitteilungen aus der Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung, Institut für Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung (IAB), Nürnberg [Institute for Employment Research, Nuremberg, Germany], vol. 3(4), pages 313-325.
    10. Vernon, Raymond, 1979. "The Product Cycle Hypothesis in a New International Environment," Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, Department of Economics, University of Oxford, vol. 41(4), pages 255-267, November.
    11. Singh, Ajit, 1977. "UK Industry and the World Economy: A Case of De-industrialisation?," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 1(2), pages 113-136, June.
    12. Murata, Yasusada, 2008. "Engel's law, Petty's law, and agglomeration," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 87(1), pages 161-177, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Anu Keshiro Toriola & Emmanuel Oladapo George & Walid Gbadebo Adebosin, 2021. "The Nexus Between Commodity Terms and National Terms of Trade of Sub-Sahara African Countries: Implication for Intersectoral Linkage," South-Eastern Europe Journal of Economics, Association of Economic Universities of South and Eastern Europe and the Black Sea Region, vol. 19(1), pages 79-98.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rainer Przywara, 2017. "Deindustrialization - Opportunity or Threat?," Athens Journal of Business & Economics, Athens Institute for Education and Research (ATINER), vol. 3(4), pages 427-462, October.
    2. Peter Mayerhofer, 2007. "De-Industrialisierung in Wien(?) Zur abnehmenden Bedeutung der Sachgütererzeugung für das Wiener Beschäftigungssystem: Umfang, Gründe, Wirkungsmechanismen," WIFO Studies, WIFO, number 33120, April.
    3. Marija Beg & Martina Basarac Sertic & Ivo Druzic, 2017. "Determinants of Deindustrialisation in Developed European and Post-Communist Countries," Montenegrin Journal of Economics, Economic Laboratory for Transition Research (ELIT), vol. 13(2), pages 93-106.
    4. Maria Savona, 2021. "Revisiting High Development Theory to Explain Upgrading Prospects in Business Services Global Value Chains," The European Journal of Development Research, Palgrave Macmillan;European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI), vol. 33(2), pages 206-226, April.
    5. Kucera, David, & Roncolato, Leanne., 2012. "Structure matters : sectoral drivers of growth and the labour productivity-employment relationship," ILO Working Papers 994717343402676, International Labour Organization.
    6. Ashwani Saith, 2018. "Ajit Singh (1940–2015), the Radical Cambridge Economist: Anti†imperialist Advocate of Third World Industrialization," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 49(2), pages 561-628, March.
    7. Ajit Singh, 2005. "Forum 2005," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 36(6), pages 1219-1223, November.
    8. Alexandre Messa, 2012. "Structural Change in The Brazilian Economy in The 2000s," Discussion Papers 1770, Instituto de Pesquisa Econômica Aplicada - IPEA.
    9. Wilson Quijano & Diego Alejandro Guevara-Castañeda, 2021. "Desindustrialización: evidencias desde una mirada kaldoriana para Colombia (2005-2017)," Ensayos de Economía 19342, Universidad Nacional de Colombia Sede Medellín.
    10. Armando J. Garcia Pires & José Pedro Pontes, 2021. "(De)Industrialization, Technology and Transportation," Open Economies Review, Springer, vol. 32(3), pages 527-538, July.
    11. Yahya Z. ALSHEHHI & Jozsef POPP, 2017. "Sectoral Analysis: Growth Accounting Of Tertiary Industries," SEA - Practical Application of Science, Romanian Foundation for Business Intelligence, Editorial Department, issue 14, pages 221-230, August.
    12. Çakır, Muhammet Sait & Aydemir, Resul, 2022. "A Dutch disease approach into the premature deindustrialization," Economic Systems, Elsevier, vol. 46(4).
    13. Yazgan, Sekip & Marangoz, Cumali & Bulut, Emre, 2022. "The turning point of regional deindustrialization in the U.S.: Evidence from panel and time-series data," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 294-304.
    14. Nuvolari, Alessandro & Russo, Emanuele, 2019. "Technical progress and structural change: a long-term view," MERIT Working Papers 2019-022, United Nations University - Maastricht Economic and Social Research Institute on Innovation and Technology (MERIT).
    15. Peter Sheehan, 2008. "Beyond Industrialization: New Approaches to Development Strategy Based on the Service Sector," WIDER Working Paper Series RP2008-60, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    16. Singh, Ajit., 2007. "Globalisation, industrial revolutions in India and China and labour markets in advanced countries : implications for national and international economic policy," ILO Working Papers 993979343402676, International Labour Organization.
    17. Agustiar, Memet, 2013. "Structural Transformation in West Kalimantan Towards ASEAN Economic Community 2015," MPRA Paper 66552, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised Apr 2013.
    18. Amrita Roy, 2022. "Structural change and labour productivity trend in the non-agricultural sector: a study of Asia," European Journal of Comparative Economics, Cattaneo University (LIUC), vol. 19(2), pages 227-249, December.
    19. Gisela Di Meglio & Jorge Gallego & Andrés Maroto & Maria Savona, 2015. "Services in Developing Economies: A new chance for catching-up?," SPRU Working Paper Series 2015-32, SPRU - Science Policy Research Unit, University of Sussex Business School.
    20. Sher Singh Verick, 2016. "Manufacturing and jobs: is India different?," The Indian Journal of Labour Economics, Springer;The Indian Society of Labour Economics (ISLE), vol. 59(1), pages 57-84, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ate:journl:ajbev5i2-1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Afrodete Papanikou (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.athensjournals.gr .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.