IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aou/nszioz/y2018i2p131-142.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Uniwersytet przedsiębiorczy – moda czy konieczność?

Author

Listed:
  • Piotr Pietrzak

Abstract

Stale zmniejszający się poziom finansowania publicznego, rosnąca biurokratyzacja czy umasowienie kształcenia sprawiają, że uczelnie coraz częściej działają zgodnie z logiką New Public Management (nowe zarządzanie publiczne), zaś idea uniwersytetu przedsiębiorczego staje się jednym z głównych punktów odniesienia w międzynarodowych i europejskich debatach o przyszłości szkolnictwa wyższego. Terminologia używana w biznesie coraz częściej służy do opisu działalności akademickiej. Wykorzystywane są takie pojęcia jak: „produkcja wiedzy”, „podaż usług edukacyjnych”, „rynek usług edukacyjnych”, czy „efektywność funkcjonowania szkół wyższych”. Jednocześnie część środowiska akademickiego dostrzega w dokonującej się transformacji zagrożenie dla tradycyjnego modelu uczelni, eksponującego takie wartości jak: wolność intelektualna, bezinteresowna nauka, dążenie do prawdy. Celem niniejszego artykułu jest odpowiedź na pytanie, czy uniwersytet przedsiębiorczy jest chwilową modą, czy też koniecznością wynikającą z dokonujących się przemian społeczno-gospodarczych?

Suggested Citation

  • Piotr Pietrzak, 2018. "Uniwersytet przedsiębiorczy – moda czy konieczność?," Nowoczesne Systemy Zarządzania. Modern Management Systems, Military University of Technology, Faculty of Security, Logistics and Management, Institute of Organization and Management, issue 2, pages 131-142.
    • Handle: RePEc:aou:nszioz:y:2018:i:2:p:131-142
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://nsz.wat.edu.pl/pdf-129515-61609
    File Function: Full text
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tatiana Suspitsyna, 2012. "Higher Education for Economic Advancement and Engaged Citizenship: An Analysis of the U.S. Department of Education Discourse," The Journal of Higher Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 83(1), pages 49-72, January.
    2. Loet Leydesdorff & Henry Etzkowitz, 1996. "Emergence of a Triple Helix of university—industry—government relations," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 23(5), pages 279-286, October.
    3. Sadri Tahar & Roman Boutellier, 2013. "Resource Allocation in Higher Education in The Context of New Public Management," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(5), pages 687-711, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Beesley, Lisa G. A., 2003. "Science policy in changing times: are governments poised to take full advantage of an institution in transition?," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 32(8), pages 1519-1531, September.
    2. Li, Yin & Arora, Sanjay & Youtie, Jan & Shapira, Philip, 2018. "Using web mining to explore Triple Helix influences on growth in small and mid-size firms," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 76, pages 3-14.
    3. Olivier Coussi & Bastien Bernela, 2024. "Back to the Futur(oscope): a territorial development "bricolaged" by a political entrepreneur? [Retour vers le Futur(oscope) : un développement territorial « bricolé » par un entrepreneur," Post-Print hal-04452686, HAL.
    4. Paul Jackson & Reza Kiani Mavi & Yuliani Suseno & Craig Standing, 2018. "University–industry collaboration within the triple helix of innovation: The importance of mutuality," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 45(4), pages 553-564.
    5. Magerman, Tom & Looy, Bart Van & Debackere, Koenraad, 2015. "Does involvement in patenting jeopardize one’s academic footprint? An analysis of patent-paper pairs in biotechnology," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 44(9), pages 1702-1713.
    6. Leydesdorff, Loet, 2000. "The triple helix: an evolutionary model of innovations," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 29(2), pages 243-255, February.
    7. Catherine P. Slade & Saundra J. Ribando & C. Kevin Fortner, 2016. "Faculty research following merger: a job stress and social identity theory perspective," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 107(1), pages 71-89, April.
    8. Devrim Goktepe, 2003. "The Triple Helix as a model to analyze Israeli Magnet Program and lessons for late-developing countries like Turkey," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 58(2), pages 219-239, October.
    9. Lee, Young Hoon & Kim, YoungJun, 2016. "Analyzing interaction in R&D networks using the Triple Helix method: Evidence from industrial R&D programs in Korean government," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 93-105.
    10. Francesco Campanella & Maria Rosaria Della Peruta & Stefano Bresciani & Luca Dezi, 2017. "Quadruple Helix and firms’ performance: an empirical verification in Europe," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 42(2), pages 267-284, April.
    11. Grigory Viktorovich Prytkov & Natalia Yurievna Tsvetus & Artem Alexandrovich Balyakin & Andrey Sergeevich Malyshev & Sergey Borisovich Taranenko, 2017. "Scientific Cooperation between Russia and the EU in the Development and Use of Large Research Infrastructure," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(3A), pages 338-353.
    12. Jiancheng Guan & Ying He, 2007. "Patent-bibliometric analysis on the Chinese science — technology linkages," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 72(3), pages 403-425, September.
    13. Subhan Tahrima & Don Jaegal, 2013. "Applicability of Knowledge-Based Innovation System in Bangladesh," International Review of Public Administration, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(3), pages 185-208, December.
    14. Anna Jonsson & Maria Grafström & Mikael Klintman, 2022. "Unboxing knowledge in collaboration between academia and society: A story about conceptions and epistemic uncertainty [De-essentializing the Knowledge Intensive Firm: Reflections on Skeptical Resea," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 49(4), pages 583-597.
    15. Schmoch, Ulrich, 2007. "Double-boom cycles and the comeback of science-push and market-pull," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(7), pages 1000-1015, September.
    16. Wadim Strielkowski & Vyacheslav Volchik & Artyom Maskaev & Pavel Savko, 2020. "Leadership and Effective Institutional Economics Design in the Context of Education Reforms," Economies, MDPI, vol. 8(2), pages 1-15, April.
    17. Fabiano, Gianluca & Marcellusi, Andrea & Favato, Giampiero, 2021. "R versus D, from knowledge creation to value appropriation: Ownership of patents filed by European biotechnology founders," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    18. Jungwon Yoon & Joshua SungWoo Yang & Han Woo Park, 2017. "Quintuple helix structure of Sino-Korean research collaboration in science," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 113(1), pages 61-81, October.
    19. Jaelani, Aan, 2019. "Triple Helix sebagai model bagi inovasi pendidikan tinggi: Analisis logika kelembagaan dalam pengembangan kewirausahaan dan ekonomi [The Triple Helix as a model for innovation of higher education: ," MPRA Paper 95752, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 05 Jul 2019.
    20. Paola Belingheri & Filippo Chiarello & Andrea Fronzetti Colladon & Paola Rovelli, 2021. "Twenty years of gender equality research: A scoping review based on a new semantic indicatorr," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(9), pages 1-27, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aou:nszioz:y:2018:i:2:p:131-142. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Michał Jurek (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://nsz.wat.edu.pl/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.