IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ajn/jobafd/v8y2024ip6-16id236.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Technology and AI—Impact on Country’s Growth and Unemployment

Author

Listed:
  • Brij Behari Dave

Abstract

This study examines the impact of artificial intelligence (AI) adoption on economic growth and unemployment across G7 countries and India. As AI emerges as a transformative technology, there is a need to understand its effects on labour markets and develop appropriate policy frameworks. The research analyses historical patterns of automation and technological change to provide context for the current AI revolution. The study employs a mixed-methods approach, combining quantitative statistical analyses with qualitative assessments. Variables examined include GDP growth rates, R&D investment levels, AI adoption rates, and productivity gains. Descriptive statistics, correlation analyses, regression models, and cluster analyses were conducted to identify relationships between key variables. Results reveal a significant technology adoption gap between high-tech leaders and developing economies. A growth paradox was observed in developing tech economies, where rapid AI adoption did not necessarily translate to proportional economic gains. The research found complex relationships between technological advancement, unemployment rates, and investment levels across countries. Cluster analysis identified three distinct groups: Advanced Economies, Technology Leaders, and Developing Tech Economies. ANOVA and chi-square tests confirmed statistically significant differences between these clusters. Multiple regression analysis on unemployment rates provided insights into the factors influencing job displacement. Key findings include: 1) AI adoption shows potential to significantly boost GDP growth and productivity, though effects vary by country. 2) The relationship between technological progress and unemployment is nuanced, defying simplistic narratives. 3) Investment levels strongly correlate with technological advancement, but other factors also play important roles. 4) Leaders in AI adoption exhibit certain common characteristics, offering potential lessons for other nations.The study concludes that while AI presents substantial opportunities for economic growth, its benefits are not uniformly distributed. Policymakers must develop strategies for inclusive growth, equitable access to technological advancements, and robust safety nets to address potential economic stratification. Future research directions are suggested to further explore the long-term implications of AI on global economies and labour markets. This research contributes to the ongoing dialogue on AI's societal impact and provides evidence-based insights to inform policy decisions in an era of rapid technological change. The findings underscore the need for nuanced, context-specific approaches to AI adoption and regulation across different economic contexts.

Suggested Citation

  • Brij Behari Dave, 2024. "Technology and AI—Impact on Country’s Growth and Unemployment," Journal of Banking and Financial Dynamics, Eastern Centre of Science and Education, vol. 8, pages 6-16.
  • Handle: RePEc:ajn:jobafd:v:8:y:2024:i::p:6-16:id:236
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ecsenet.com/index.php/2576-6821/article/view/236/97
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mohamed Ali Trabelsi, 2024. "The impact of artificial intelligence on economic development," Journal of Electronic Business & Digital Economics, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 3(2), pages 142-155, May.
    2. Chris Freeman & Luc Soete, 1997. "The Economics of Industrial Innovation, 3rd Edition," MIT Press Books, The MIT Press, edition 3, volume 1, number 0262061953, December.
    3. Bronwyn H. Hall & Nathan Rosenberg (ed.), 2010. "Handbook of the Economics of Innovation," Handbook of the Economics of Innovation, Elsevier, edition 1, volume 1, number 1.
    4. Comin, D. & Hobijn, B., 2004. "Cross-country technology adoption: making the theories face the facts," Journal of Monetary Economics, Elsevier, vol. 51(1), pages 39-83, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mark Knell & Simone Vannuccini, 2022. "Tools and concepts for understanding disruptive technological change after Schumpeter," Jena Economics Research Papers 2022-005, Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena.
    2. Giovanni Dosi & Richard Nelson, 2013. "The Evolution of Technologies: An Assessment of the State-of-the-Art," Eurasian Business Review, Springer;Eurasia Business and Economics Society, vol. 3(1), pages 3-46, June.
    3. Attila Havas, 2016. "Social and Business Innovations: Are Common Measurement Approaches Possible?," Foresight-Russia Форсайт, CyberLeninka;Федеральное государственное автономное образовательное учреждение высшего образования «Национальный исследовательский университет «Высшая школа экономики», vol. 10(2 (eng)), pages 58-80.
    4. Luisa R. Blanco & Ji Gu & James E. Prieger, 2016. "The Impact of Research and Development on Economic Growth and Productivity in the U.S. States," Southern Economic Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 82(3), pages 914-934, January.
    5. Burcu Fazlıoğlu & Başak Dalgıç & Ahmet Burçin Yereli, 2019. "The effect of innovation on productivity: evidence from Turkish manufacturing firms," Industry and Innovation, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(4), pages 439-460, April.
    6. Edwin Goni & William F. Maloney, 2014. "Why don‚Äôt Poor Countries do R&D?," Documentos CEDE 11947, Universidad de los Andes, Facultad de Economía, CEDE.
    7. Antonelli,Cristiano, 2013. "The economics of technological congruence," Department of Economics and Statistics Cognetti de Martiis LEI & BRICK - Laboratory of Economics of Innovation "Franco Momigliano", Bureau of Research in Innovation, Complexity and Knowledge, Collegio 201304, University of Turin.
    8. Nina Czernich, 2011. "The emergence of broadband internet and consequences for economic and social development," ifo Beiträge zur Wirtschaftsforschung, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, number 37, April.
    9. Dimitris KALLIORAS & Nickolaos TZEREMES & Panayiotis TZEREMES & Maria ADAMAKOU, 2021. "Technological Change, Technological Catch-Up And Market Potential: Evidence From The Eu Regions," Regional Science Inquiry, Hellenic Association of Regional Scientists, vol. 0(1), pages 135-151, June.
    10. Antonelli, Cristiano, 2016. "Technological congruence and the economic complexity of technological change," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 38(C), pages 15-24.
    11. Havas, Attila, 2016. "Recent economic theorising on innovation: Lessons for analysing social innovation," MPRA Paper 77385, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    12. Havas, Attila, 2014. "Types of knowledge and diversity of business-academia collaborations: Implications for measurement and policy," MPRA Paper 65908, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 23 May 2015.
    13. Stefan Kipar, 2012. "Determinants of Firm Innovation - Evidence from German Panel Data," ifo Beiträge zur Wirtschaftsforschung, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, number 45, April.
    14. Rammer, Christian & Spielkamp, Alfred, 2015. "Hidden Champions - Driven by Innovation: Empirische Befunde auf Basis des Mannheimer Innovationspanels," ZEW Dokumentationen 15-03, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
    15. Christophe Pennetier & Karan Girotra & Jürgen Mihm, 2019. "R&D Spending: Dynamic or Persistent?," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 21(3), pages 636-657, July.
    16. Blanco, Iván & Wehrheim, David, 2017. "The bright side of financial derivatives: Options trading and firm innovation," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 125(1), pages 99-119.
    17. Attila Havas, 2015. "Various approaches to measuring business innovation: their relevance for capturing social innovation," CERS-IE WORKING PAPERS 1554, Institute of Economics, Centre for Economic and Regional Studies.
    18. Foxon, T. J. & Gross, R. & Chase, A. & Howes, J. & Arnall, A. & Anderson, D., 2005. "UK innovation systems for new and renewable energy technologies: drivers, barriers and systems failures," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 33(16), pages 2123-2137, November.
    19. Hickfang, Michael & Holder, Ulrike, 2018. "The impact of stock options on risk-taking: Founder-CEOs and innovation," Discussion Papers of the Institute for Organisational Economics 12/2018, University of Münster, Institute for Organisational Economics.
    20. Jan Fagerberg & Bengt-Åke Lundvall & Martin Srholec, 2018. "Global Value Chains, National Innovation Systems and Economic Development," The European Journal of Development Research, Palgrave Macmillan;European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI), vol. 30(3), pages 533-556, July.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ajn:jobafd:v:8:y:2024:i::p:6-16:id:236. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Tracy William The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask Tracy William to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://ecsenet.com/index.php/2576-6821/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.