IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aiy/jnjaer/v24y2025i1p287-318.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessing the Risks of Employees Failing to Achieve the Organization's Performance Indicators when Implementing the Well-Being Program

Author

Listed:
  • Lev S. Mazelis
  • Gleb V. Grenkin
  • Kirill I. Lavrenyuk
  • Andrey A. Krasko

Abstract

The study was conducted within the framework of an urgent task of assessing the impact of external and internal environmental factors on the development of an organization's human capital and reducing the level of employee burnout through the prism of the formation and implementation of its corporate well-being program. The aim of the work is to develop a method for assessing the possible degree of deviation from the simulated progress towards achieving the target values of key performance indicators of the organization's employees based on the formation of an optimal structure for the distribution of investments in the areas of the well-being program. To achieve this goal, a hypothesis is put forward about the possibility of building a tool that makes it possible to assess possible degrees of deviation of the achieved employee performance indicators from those predicted by the optimization model and ranking by the strength of the influence of internal and external risks on these deviations. The proposed method consists of a simulation model based on the Monte Carlo method and an algorithm for quantifying risks. The algorithm consists of 3 stages: generation of realizations of optimization model parameters considered as random variables; building a sample of the values of the resulting indicators: the optimal structure of investment in the areas of the well-being program, an integral indicator of the effectiveness of the organization; calculating the risks of not achieving the target values of key employee performance indicators from the resulting sample. When testing the method, the uncertainties of the values of parameters of 4 types are considered: coefficients of econometric dependencies of influence channels; bounds of the intervals of gradient constancy of piecewise linear functions; bounds of categories of integral indicators; restrictions on the top of the total volume of investments in the directions. The testing showed that uncertainties of econometric dependencies and category bounds have the greatest impact on the magnitude of risks of failure to achieve key employee performance indicators. From a practical point of view, the proposed tool will allow us to assess the impact of various factors of the external and internal environment on the progress towards achieving key employee performance indicators by developing employee competence and reducing their burnout, which occurs as a result of the implementation of the corporate well-being program. Based on the assessment of this impact, it is possible to select measures that will help to mitigate the existing risks.

Suggested Citation

  • Lev S. Mazelis & Gleb V. Grenkin & Kirill I. Lavrenyuk & Andrey A. Krasko, 2025. "Assessing the Risks of Employees Failing to Achieve the Organization's Performance Indicators when Implementing the Well-Being Program," Journal of Applied Economic Research, Graduate School of Economics and Management, Ural Federal University, vol. 24(1), pages 287-318.
  • Handle: RePEc:aiy:jnjaer:v:24:y:2025:i:1:p:287-318
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.15826/vestnik.2025.24.1.010
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journalaer.ru//fileadmin/user_upload/site_15934/2025/10_Mazelis_Grenkin_Lavrenjuk_Krasko.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/https://doi.org/10.15826/vestnik.2025.24.1.010?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Olena Kakhovska & Tetiana Lositska & Katerina Kolesnikova, 2018. "Economic Efficiency Of Investments Into Personnel Development Of Enterprises," Baltic Journal of Economic Studies, Publishing house "Baltija Publishing", vol. 4(3).
    2. Aven, Terje, 2016. "Risk assessment and risk management: Review of recent advances on their foundation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 253(1), pages 1-13.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Andres Mauricio Molina Barreto & Naoyuki Ishimura, 2023. "Remarks on a copula‐based conditional value at risk for the portfolio problem," Intelligent Systems in Accounting, Finance and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 30(3), pages 150-170, July.
    2. Serpell Alfredo Federico & Ferrada Ximena & Rubio Larissa, 2019. "Measuring the performance of project risk management: a preliminary model," Organization, Technology and Management in Construction, Sciendo, vol. 11(1), pages 1984-1991, January.
    3. Simon French, 2024. "Whose Judgement? Reflections on Elicitation in Bayesian Analysis," Decision Analysis, INFORMS, vol. 21(3), pages 143-159, September.
    4. Aven, Terje & Renn, Ortwin, 2018. "Improving government policy on risk: Eight key principles," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 176(C), pages 230-241.
    5. Mazurina Mohd Ali & Nur Shazwani Ab Hamid & Erlane K Ghani, 2019. "Examining the Relationship Between Enterprise Risk Management and Firm Performance in Malaysia," International Journal of Financial Research, International Journal of Financial Research, Sciedu Press, vol. 10(3), pages 239-251, May.
    6. Bożena Babiarz, 2018. "Aspects of Heat Supply Security Management Using Elements of Decision Theory," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-14, October.
    7. Leif Inge K. Sørskår & Eirik B. Abrahamsen, 2017. "On how to manage uncertainty when considering regulatory HSE interventions," EURO Journal on Decision Processes, Springer;EURO - The Association of European Operational Research Societies, vol. 5(1), pages 97-116, November.
    8. Davide Settembre-Blundo & Rocío González-Sánchez & Sonia Medina-Salgado & Fernando E. García-Muiña, 2021. "Flexibility and Resilience in Corporate Decision Making: A New Sustainability-Based Risk Management System in Uncertain Times," Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, Springer;Global Institute of Flexible Systems Management, vol. 22(2), pages 107-132, December.
    9. Gundula Glowka & Richard Hule & Anita Zehrer, 2024. "Risk perception of SMEs: strategic risks, family-related risks, external risks," Risk Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 26(4), pages 1-27, December.
    10. Julia Eichholz & Nicole Hoffmann & Anja Schwering, 2024. "The role of risk management orientation and the planning function of budgeting in enhancing organizational resilience and its effect on competitive advantages during times of crises," Journal of Management Control: Zeitschrift für Planung und Unternehmenssteuerung, Springer, vol. 35(1), pages 17-58, March.
    11. Maria Cheveresan & Cristian Stefan Dumitriu & Maria Stoica, 2024. "Environmental Economics in Flood Mitigation for River Basins and Cities," Ovidius University Annals, Economic Sciences Series, Ovidius University of Constantza, Faculty of Economic Sciences, vol. 0(1), pages 50-57, August.
    12. Sachin Modgil & Rohit Kumar Singh & Cyril Foropon, 2022. "Quality management in humanitarian operations and disaster relief management: a review and future research directions," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 319(1), pages 1045-1098, December.
    13. Stavros Kalogiannidis & Stamatis Kontsas & Dimitrios Kalfas & Fotios Chatzitheodoridis, 2024. "Operational risk management in managerial accounting: a comprehensive examination of strategies and implementation in medium size organizations," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 24(3), pages 1-27, September.
    14. repec:arp:tjssrr:2019:p:69-75 is not listed on IDEAS
    15. Hatami-Marbini, Adel & Asu, John Otu & Hafeez, Khalid & Khoshnevis, Pegah, 2024. "DEA-driven risk management framework for oil supply chains," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).
    16. Nicola Pedroni & Enrico Zio & Alberto Pasanisi & Mathieu Couplet, 2017. "A critical discussion and practical recommendations on some issues relevant to the non-probabilistic treatment of uncertainty in engineering risk assessment," Post-Print hal-01652230, HAL.
    17. Mussard, Stéphane & Pi Alperin, María Noel, 2021. "Accounting for risk factors on health outcomes: The case of Luxembourg," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 291(3), pages 1180-1197.
    18. Mazurina Mohd Ali & Sakinah Zahra Norman & Erlane K. Ghani* & Noor Hasniza Haron, 2018. "The Influence of Risk Management on Construction Project Performance: A Case Study," The Journal of Social Sciences Research, Academic Research Publishing Group, pages 936-942:5.
    19. Dimitrios Chionis & Nektarios Karanikas, 2022. "Risk Perception and Risk Communication from a Systems Perspective: a Study on Safety Behavioural Intervention Frameworks and Functions," Systemic Practice and Action Research, Springer, vol. 35(5), pages 711-746, October.
    20. Zohreh Molamohamadi & Mahmoud Asad Samani & Marjan Karimi, 2024. "Reviewing the historical milestones of risk management," SN Business & Economics, Springer, vol. 4(12), pages 1-20, December.
    21. Huang, Wencheng & Zhang, Yue & Yu, Yaocheng & Xu, Yifei & Xu, Minhao & Zhang, Rui & De Dieu, Gatesi Jean & Yin, Dezhi & Liu, Zhanru, 2021. "Historical data-driven risk assessment of railway dangerous goods transportation system: Comparisons between Entropy Weight Method and Scatter Degree Method," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 205(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    risk assessment; corporate well-being program; key performance indicators; employee burnout; fuzzy multiple approach;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • J24 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demand and Supply of Labor - - - Human Capital; Skills; Occupational Choice; Labor Productivity

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aiy:jnjaer:v:24:y:2025:i:1:p:287-318. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Natalia Starodubets (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/seurfru.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.