IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aip/access/v3y2022i3p292-306.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Initial states and transitional expenses in production and transport systems optimization

Author

Listed:
  • Anatoliy KHOLODENKO

    (Odessa National Maritime University, Odessa, Ukraine)

  • Victoria GUSAK

    (Odessa National Maritime University, Odessa, Ukraine)

Abstract

The production and transport systems optimization models, as well as classical transport or distributive problems, mainly concentrate on finding of the plan, optimum according to own characteristics, and don't take into account costs on system transition from its given (initial) state to defined as optimum. The neglect of such transitional expenses leads to certain losses of the corresponding models’ adequacy and to obtaining the absolutely-optimal solution, which is invariant to initial system state. In our paper we introduce and investigate the notion of relatively-optimal plans. The basic types of dependences of relatively-optimal plans and maximum achievable profit on the production and transport system initial state under the different functions of transitional expenses are determined. Corresponding computer calculations are also carried out and confirmed our theoretical results and conclusions. From the mathematical point of view, the accounting of initial states and the transitional expenses, on the one hand, complicates the corresponding models and computing processes, however on the other hand – does the models even more interesting, creates additional non-trivial effects

Suggested Citation

  • Anatoliy KHOLODENKO & Victoria GUSAK, 2022. "Initial states and transitional expenses in production and transport systems optimization," Access Journal, Access Press Publishing House, vol. 3(3), pages 292-306, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:aip:access:v:3:y:2022:i:3:p:292-306
    DOI: 10.46656/access.2022.3.3(8)
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journal.access-bg.org/journalfiles/journal/issue-3-3-2022/initial_states_and_transitional_expenses_in_production_and_transport_systems_optimization.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.46656/access.2022.3.3(8)?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Grazia Speranza, M., 2018. "Trends in transportation and logistics," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 264(3), pages 830-836.
    2. Guajardo, Mario & Rönnqvist, Mikael & Flisberg, Patrik & Frisk, Mikael, 2018. "Collaborative transportation with overlapping coalitions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 271(1), pages 238-249.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Margaretha Gansterer & Richard F. Hartl, 2020. "Shared resources in collaborative vehicle routing," TOP: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 28(1), pages 1-20, April.
    2. Zhang, Xuemei & Zhou, Gengui & Cao, Jian & Wu, Anqi, 2020. "Evolving strategies of e-commerce and express delivery enterprises with public supervision," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
    3. Mancini, Simona & Gansterer, Margaretha & Hartl, Richard F., 2021. "The collaborative consistent vehicle routing problem with workload balance," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 293(3), pages 955-965.
    4. Eikenbroek, Oskar A.L. & Still, Georg J. & van Berkum, Eric C., 2022. "Improving the performance of a traffic system by fair rerouting of travelers," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 299(1), pages 195-207.
    5. Heydari, Jafar & Momeni, Behnam, 2021. "Retailers’ coalition and quantity discounts under demand uncertainty," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 61(C).
    6. Ritzinger, Ulrike & Puchinger, Jakob & Rudloff, Christian & Hartl, Richard F., 2022. "Comparison of anticipatory algorithms for a dial-a-ride problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 301(2), pages 591-608.
    7. Bouchery, Yann & Hezarkhani, Behzad & Stauffer, Gautier, 2022. "Coalition formation and cost sharing for truck platooning," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 165(C), pages 15-34.
    8. Chin-Ling Chen & Dong-Peng Lin & Hsing-Chung Chen & Yong-Yuan Deng & Chin-Feng Lee, 2019. "Design of a Logistics System with Privacy and Lightweight Verification," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(16), pages 1-22, August.
    9. Hrabec, Dušan & Hvattum, Lars Magnus & Hoff, Arild, 2022. "The value of integrated planning for production, inventory, and routing decisions: A systematic review and meta-analysis," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 248(C).
    10. Ulmer, Marlin W. & Soeffker, Ninja & Mattfeld, Dirk C., 2018. "Value function approximation for dynamic multi-period vehicle routing," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 269(3), pages 883-899.
    11. Daus, Denis & Barros, Ana Cristina & Kalaitzi, Dimitra & Muerza, Victoria & Marchiori, Irene, 2018. "Alternative development paths for Supply Chains in 2030," Chapters from the Proceedings of the Hamburg International Conference of Logistics (HICL), in: Kersten, Wolfgang & Blecker, Thorsten & Ringle, Christian M. (ed.), The Road to a Digitalized Supply Chain Management: Smart and Digital Solutions for Supply Chain Management. Proceedings of the Hamburg International C, volume 25, pages 121-141, Hamburg University of Technology (TUHH), Institute of Business Logistics and General Management.
    12. Shejun Deng & Yingying Yuan & Yong Wang & Haizhong Wang & Charles Koll, 2020. "Collaborative multicenter logistics delivery network optimization with resource sharing," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(11), pages 1-31, November.
    13. Cláudia A. Soares Machado & Nicolas Patrick Marie De Salles Hue & Fernando Tobal Berssaneti & José Alberto Quintanilha, 2018. "An Overview of Shared Mobility," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-21, November.
    14. Aleksandr Saprykin & Ndaona Chokani & Reza S. Abhari, 2021. "Uncertainties of Sub-Scaled Supply and Demand in Agent-Based Mobility Simulations with Queuing Traffic Model," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 21(2), pages 261-290, June.
    15. Schwerdfeger, Stefan & Boysen, Nils, 2020. "Optimizing the changing locations of mobile parcel lockers in last-mile distribution," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 285(3), pages 1077-1094.
    16. Liu, Weihua & Wang, Siyu & Lin, Yong & Xie, Dong & Zhang, Jiahui, 2020. "Effect of intelligent logistics policy on shareholder value: Evidence from Chinese logistics companies," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 137(C).
    17. Åse Jevinger & Carl Magnus Olsson, 2021. "Introducing an Intelligent Goods Service Framework," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 5(3), pages 1-20, August.
    18. Basso, Franco & Basso, Leonardo J. & Rönnqvist, Mikael & Weintraub, Andres, 2021. "Coalition formation in collaborative production and transportation with competing firms," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 289(2), pages 569-581.
    19. Margaretha Gansterer & Richard F. Hartl, 2021. "The Prisoners’ Dilemma in collaborative carriers’ request selection," Central European Journal of Operations Research, Springer;Slovak Society for Operations Research;Hungarian Operational Research Society;Czech Society for Operations Research;Österr. Gesellschaft für Operations Research (ÖGOR);Slovenian Society Informatika - Section for Operational Research;Croatian Operational Research Society, vol. 29(1), pages 73-87, March.
    20. Shrutika Mishra & A. R. Tripathi, 2020. "Literature review on business prototypes for digital platform," Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Springer, vol. 9(1), pages 1-19, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    absolutely and relatively optimal plans; optimization models; profit;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C51 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric Modeling - - - Model Construction and Estimation
    • C61 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Mathematical Methods; Programming Models; Mathematical and Simulation Modeling - - - Optimization Techniques; Programming Models; Dynamic Analysis
    • O21 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Development Planning and Policy - - - Planning Models; Planning Policy

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aip:access:v:3:y:2022:i:3:p:292-306. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Mariana Petrova (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://access-bg.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.