IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aif/report/v10y2025i1p116-129.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Geospatial big data analytics for Precision Agriculture: Enhancing Productivity and Sustainability

Author

Listed:
  • Lodu Bosco John

    (Department of Computer Science, University of Juba, Juba, South Sudan.)

  • George Jimaga James

    (Department of Computer Science, University of Juba, Juba, South Sudan.)

Abstract

Geospatial big data analytics is rapidly reshaping the landscape of precision agriculture by enabling more informed, efficient, and sustainable farming practices. This review critically examines the convergence of geospatial technologies such as remote sensing, Geographic Information Systems (GIS), and unmanned aerial systems with big data analytics techniques, including machine learning, predictive modeling, and cloud computing. Key applications explored include crop health monitoring, site-specific soil management, climate and weather analytics, and sustainability assessment, all of which support data-driven decision-making across the agricultural value chain. The paper synthesizes recent developments from 2022 to 2025, highlighting how these innovations are enhancing yield prediction, resource optimization, and environmental stewardship. It also addresses prevailing challenges related to data integration, interoperability, infrastructure scalability, data privacy, and user adoption. In response, the review outlines emerging research priorities, including the deployment of edge computing for real-time analytics, the integration of artificial intelligence and blockchain for secure and transparent data ecosystems, and the advancement of climate-resilient and socially inclusive agricultural models. Collectively, these directions are vital for achieving global food security and promoting sustainable agricultural systems in an era of climatic and demographic uncertainty.

Suggested Citation

  • Lodu Bosco John & George Jimaga James, 2025. "Geospatial big data analytics for Precision Agriculture: Enhancing Productivity and Sustainability," Journal of Scientific Reports, IJSAB International, vol. 10(1), pages 116-129.
    • Handle: RePEc:aif:report:v:10:y:2025:i:1:p:116-129
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ijsab.com/wp-content/uploads/1119.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.ijsab.com/jsr-volume-10-issue-1/8074
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jonathan A. Foley & Navin Ramankutty & Kate A. Brauman & Emily S. Cassidy & James S. Gerber & Matt Johnston & Nathaniel D. Mueller & Christine O’Connell & Deepak K. Ray & Paul C. West & Christian Balz, 2011. "Solutions for a cultivated planet," Nature, Nature, vol. 478(7369), pages 337-342, October.
    2. Wolfert, Sjaak & Ge, Lan & Verdouw, Cor & Bogaardt, Marc-Jeroen, 2017. "Big Data in Smart Farming – A review," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 69-80.
    3. Leslie Lipper & Philip Thornton & Bruce M. Campbell & Tobias Baedeker & Ademola Braimoh & Martin Bwalya & Patrick Caron & Andrea Cattaneo & Dennis Garrity & Kevin Henry & Ryan Hottle & Louise Jackson , 2014. "Climate-smart agriculture for food security," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 4(12), pages 1068-1072, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ascui, Francisco & Ball, Alex & Kahn, Lewis & Rowe, James, 2021. "Is operationalising natural capital risk assessment practicable?," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 52(C).
    2. Iban, Muzaffer Can & Aksu, Oktay, 2020. "A model for big spatial rural data infrastructure in Turkey: Sensor-driven and integrative approach," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    3. Piancharoenwong, Assanee & Badir, Yuosre F., 2024. "IoT smart farming adoption intention under climate change: The gain and loss perspective," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 200(C).
    4. Rolf, Werner & Diehl, Katharina & Zasada, Ingo & Wiggering, Hubert, 2020. "Integrating farmland in urban green infrastructure planning. An evidence synthesis for informed policymaking," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    5. Mockshell, Jonathan & Kamanda, Josey Ondieki, 2017. "Beyond the agroecological and sustainable agricultural intensification debate: is blended sustainability the way forward?," IDOS Discussion Papers 16/2017, German Institute of Development and Sustainability (IDOS).
    6. Morteza Akbari & Pantea Foroudi & Mohana Shahmoradi & Hamid Padash & Zahra Shahabaldini Parizi & Ala Khosravani & Pouria Ataei & Maria Teresa Cuomo, 2022. "The Evolution of Food Security: Where Are We Now, Where Should We Go Next?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-27, March.
    7. Chamara, Nipuna & Islam, Md Didarul & Bai, Geng (Frank) & Shi, Yeyin & Ge, Yufeng, 2022. "Ag-IoT for crop and environment monitoring: Past, present, and future," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 203(C).
    8. M. Saravanan & Satheesh K. Perepu, 2019. "Realizing Social-Media-Based Analytics for Smart Agriculture," The Review of Socionetwork Strategies, Springer, vol. 13(1), pages 33-53, June.
    9. Lin Xie & Biliang Luo & Wenjing Zhong, 2021. "How Are Smallholder Farmers Involved in Digital Agriculture in Developing Countries: A Case Study from China," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-16, March.
    10. Emily L. Pakhtigian & Subhrendu K. Pattanayak & Jie-Sheng Tan-Soo, 2024. "Forest Fires, Smoky Kitchens, and Human Health in Indonesia," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 87(8), pages 2115-2141, August.
    11. Krishna Bahadur KC & Iftekharul Haque & Alexander F. Legwegoh & Evan D. G. Fraser, 2016. "Strategies to Reduce Food Loss in the Global South," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(7), pages 1-13, June.
    12. Rommel, Jens & Anggraini, Eva, 2018. "Spatially explicit framed field experiments on ecosystem services governance," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 34(PB), pages 201-205.
    13. Oliver Falck & Johannes Koenen, 2020. "Rohstoff „Daten“: Volkswirtschaflicher Nutzen von Datenbereitstellung – eine Bestandsaufnahme," ifo Forschungsberichte, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, number 113, July.
    14. World Bank Group, 2016. "Making Climate Finance Work in Agriculture," World Bank Publications - Reports 25366, The World Bank Group.
    15. Hrosul, Viktoriia & Kruhlova, Olena & Kolesnyk, Alina, 2023. "Digitalization of the agricultural sector: the impact of ICT on the development of enterprises in Ukraine," Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, vol. 9(4), December.
    16. Huo, Dongyang & Malik, Asad Waqar & Ravana, Sri Devi & Rahman, Anis Ur & Ahmedy, Ismail, 2024. "Mapping smart farming: Addressing agricultural challenges in data-driven era," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 189(PA).
    17. John M. Wallace & Alwyn Williams & Jeffrey A. Liebert & Victoria J. Ackroyd & Rachel A. Vann & William S. Curran & Clair L. Keene & Mark J. VanGessel & Matthew R. Ryan & Steven B. Mirsky, 2017. "Cover Crop-Based, Organic Rotational No-Till Corn and Soybean Production Systems in the Mid-Atlantic United States," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 7(4), pages 1-21, April.
    18. Mathy Sane & Miroslav Hajek & Chukwudi Nwaogu & Ratna Chrismiari Purwestri, 2021. "Subsidy as An Economic Instrument for Environmental Protection: A Case of Global Fertilizer Use," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-20, August.
    19. Maleki, Tahereh & Koohestani, Hossein & Keshavarz, Marzieh, 2022. "Can climate-smart agriculture mitigate the Urmia Lake tragedy in its eastern basin?," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 260(C).
    20. Tadas Limba & Andrejus Novikovas & Andrius Stankevičius & Antanas Andrulevičius & Manuela Tvaronavičienė, 2020. "Big Data Manifestation in Municipal Waste Management and Cryptocurrency Sectors: Positive and Negative Implementation Factors," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-14, April.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aif:report:v:10:y:2025:i:1:p:116-129. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Farjana Rahman (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.