IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aic/saebjn/v63y2016i1p65-81n20.html

Influence Of Rules For Computing Corporate Income Tax On The Accuracy Of Financial Statements Of Lithuanian Companies

Author

Listed:
  • Gintaras CERNIUS
  • Liucija BIRSKYTE
  • Arturas BALKEVICIUS

Abstract

Companies in Lithuania have to follow Business Accounting Standards (BAS) when preparing their financial statements. Recording financial transactions according to BAS ensures that the information a company shares with potential lenders and investors gives a true and fair view of its business situation. However, the tax law prescribes its own set of accounting rules, which can result in a difference between what a business shows in financial statements and what it reports on its tax returns. This paper examines whether Lithuanian companies predominantly use tax accounting principles that migrate into their financial statements to create an inaccurate picture of business performance. The method of experts’ evaluation was chosen for that purpose. The results indicate that Lithuanian companies tend to heavily rely on accounting principles prescribed in corporate income tax law thus distorting information contained in financial statements. The paper contributes to the scarce literature on this issue of high relevance to both academics and practitioners. JEL Codes - O21, C45, P24

Suggested Citation

  • Gintaras CERNIUS & Liucija BIRSKYTE & Arturas BALKEVICIUS, 2016. "Influence Of Rules For Computing Corporate Income Tax On The Accuracy Of Financial Statements Of Lithuanian Companies," Scientific Annals of Economics and Business (continues Analele Stiintifice), Alexandru Ioan Cuza University, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, vol. 63(1), pages 65-81, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:aic:saebjn:v:63:y:2016:i:1:p:65-81:n:20
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://saeb.feaa.uaic.ro/index.php/saeb/article/view/989
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dan S. Dhaliwal & Steven E. Kaplan & Rick C. Laux & Eric Weisbrod, 2013. "The Information Content of Tax Expense for Firms Reporting Losses," Journal of Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 51(1), pages 135-164, March.
    2. Barth, ME & Clinch, G, 1998. "Revalued financial, tangible, and intangible assets: Associations with share prices and non-market-based value estimates," Journal of Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 36, pages 199-233.
    3. Eli Amir & Michael Kirschenheiter & Kristen Willard, 1997. "The Valuation of Deferred Taxes," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 14(4), pages 597-622, December.
    4. Aboody, David & Barth, Mary E. & Kasznik, Ron, 1999. "Revaluations of fixed assets and future firm performance: Evidence from the UK1," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 26(1-3), pages 149-178, January.
    5. Sonnier, Blaise M. & Hennig, Cherie J. & Everett, John O. & Raabe, William A., 2012. "Reporting of book-tax differences for financial and tax purposes: A case study," Journal of Accounting Education, Elsevier, vol. 30(1), pages 58-79.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Cernius Gintaras & Birskyte Liucija & Balkevicius Arturas, 2016. "Influence of Rules for Computing Corporate Income Tax on the Accuracy of Financial Statements of Lithuanian Companies," Scientific Annals of Economics and Business, Sciendo, vol. 63(1), pages 65-81, March.
    2. Zachary King & Thomas J. Linsmeier & Daniel D. Wangerin, 2024. "Differences in the value relevance of identifiable intangible assets," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 29(4), pages 3838-3886, December.
    3. Xiaofei Song, 2024. "Fair values in extreme markets," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 64(4), pages 3443-3467, December.
    4. Anna Görlitz & Michael Dobler, 2023. "Financial accounting for deferred taxes: a systematic review of empirical evidence," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 73(1), pages 113-165, February.
    5. Mehnaz, Laura & Rahman, Asheq & Kabir, Humayun, 2023. "Covenant violation concern and investors’ pricing of Level 3 fair value adjustments," Journal of Contemporary Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 19(3).
    6. Jincheol Bae & Jaehong Lee & Eunsoo Kim, 2019. "Does Fixed Asset Revaluation Build Trust between Management and Investors?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(13), pages 1-22, July.
    7. José Veiga & Joaquim Fernandes & Cristina Gonçalves & Georgette Andraz, 2015. "The Relevance of Fair Value Across Countries: Firms Listed in Lisbon and Madrid Stock Exchange," Journal of Tourism, Sustainability and Well-being, CinTurs - Research Centre for Tourism, Sustainability and Well-being, University of Algarve, vol. 3(1), pages 78-95.
    8. Doron Israeli, 2015. "Recognition versus disclosure: evidence from fair value of investment property," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 20(4), pages 1457-1503, December.
    9. Julie Cotter & Scott Richardson, 2002. "Reliability of Asset Revaluations: The Impact of Appraiser Independence," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 7(4), pages 435-457, December.
    10. Robert Edelstein & Steve Fortin & Desmond Tsang, 2012. "An International Exploration of Financial Reporting Practices in the Real Estate Industry," International Real Estate Review, Global Social Science Institute, vol. 15(3), pages 347-372.
    11. Jung, Boochun & Pourjalali, Hamid & Wen, Eric & Daniel, Shirley J., 2013. "The association between firm characteristics and CFO's opinions on the fair value option for non-financial assets," Advances in accounting, Elsevier, vol. 29(2), pages 255-266.
    12. Habeeb Mohamed Nijam, 2018. "Motives for Reporting Fixed Assets at Revalued Amount: Evidence from a Developing Economy," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 19(3), pages 604-622, June.
    13. Gonzalo Rodríguez‐Pérez & John Slof & Magda Solà & Margarita Torrent & Immaculada Vilardell, 2011. "Assessing the Impact of Fair‐Value Accounting on Financial Statement Analysis: A Data Envelopment Analysis Approach," Abacus, Accounting Foundation, University of Sydney, vol. 47(1), pages 61-84, March.
    14. Hans B. Christensen & Valeri V. Nikolaev, 2013. "Does fair value accounting for non-financial assets pass the market test?," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 18(3), pages 734-775, September.
    15. Cho, Hyungjin & Chung, Ju Ryum & Kim, Young Jun, 2021. "Fixed asset revaluation and external financing during the financial crisis: Evidence from Korea," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    16. Cairns, David & Massoudi, Dianne & Taplin, Ross & Tarca, Ann, 2011. "IFRS fair value measurement and accounting policy choice in the United Kingdom and Australia," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 43(1), pages 1-21.
    17. Hanlon, Dean & Navissi, Farshid & Soepriyanto, Gatot, 2014. "The value relevance of deferred tax attributed to asset revaluations," Journal of Contemporary Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 10(2), pages 87-99.
    18. Fábio Moraes da Costa & Carol Liu & Gina Cavalier Rosa & Samuel L. Tiras, 2020. "The Commitment to Income‐Decreasing Accounting Choices As a Credible Signal to Reducing Information Asymmetry: The Case of Asset Revaluations," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 37(4), pages 2501-2522, December.
    19. Greg Clinch, 2000. "Accounting Measurement and Capital Markets Research," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 10(21), pages 58-62, July.
    20. Salvatore Madonna & Greta Cestari & Francesca Giuliani, 2021. "Asset revaluation: scelte manageriali in tempo di crisi," MANAGEMENT CONTROL, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2021(3), pages 41-64.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • O21 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Development Planning and Policy - - - Planning Models; Planning Policy
    • C45 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods: Special Topics - - - Neural Networks and Related Topics
    • P24 - Political Economy and Comparative Economic Systems - - Socialist and Transition Economies - - - National Income, Product, and Expenditure; Money; Inflation

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aic:saebjn:v:63:y:2016:i:1:p:65-81:n:20. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sireteanu Napoleon-Alexandru (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/feaicro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.