IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/uersfr/266246.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Farm Business Practices Coordinate Production With Consumer Preferences

Author

Listed:
  • Martinez, Steve
  • Davis, David E.

Abstract

Consumer pressures placed on agriculture for variety, quality, and safety are affecting how the industry is organized, including the types of buying and selling arrangements within the food supply chain and the application of information technologies. Farm production is becoming more capital intensive, with emphasis placed on adding value to commodities. Product differentiation and quality control are becoming more essential at the farm level. In some agricultural industries, contract production is becoming more common as food processors and distributors attempt to gain greater control over their products and ensure market outlets. Some contract arrangements specify particular production practices, such as the use of specific genetic strains or organic farming techniques. In other types of contracts, the food processor gains greater control over farm products by providing important inputs, such as the animals, feed, and management services. As contracts become more common, they replace traditional methods of buying and selling large supplies of homogeneous agricultural commodities. Traditionally, these products were conducive to buying and selling without prior commitments placed on producers, and with little control over the commodities by buyers. When the products were ready for sale, producers would take them to an auction market, terminal market, storage facility, or buying station and sell the products at the going market price in that region. Prices paid at these open, or spot, markets are referred to as spot prices.The extent of contracting varies widely across agricultural sectors (fig. 1). Nearly all poultry is produced under contract, but less than 15 percent of total grains are produced under contract. The changeover to contracting also varies by commodity. For example, in the broiler industry, contracting has been widely used since the 1950s and accounted for 93 percent of production by 1960. In the hog industry, increases in contracting are more recent. In grain markets, contracting represents a small, but growing, presence.

Suggested Citation

  • Martinez, Steve & Davis, David E., 2002. "Farm Business Practices Coordinate Production With Consumer Preferences," Food Review/ National Food Review, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, vol. 25(1).
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:uersfr:266246
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.266246
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/266246/files/FoodReview-249.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/266246/files/FoodReview-249.pdf?subformat=pdfa
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.266246?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Martinez, Steve W. & Reed, Al, 1996. "From Farmers to Consumers: Vertical Coordination in the Food Industry," Agricultural Information Bulletins 309735, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Goldsmith, Peter D. & Bender, Karen, 2003. "Ten Conversations about Identity Preservation: Implications for Cooperatives," 2003 Annual Meeting, October 29 31803, NCERA-194 Research on Cooperatives.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Goldsmith, Peter D. & Bender, Karen, 2003. "Ten Conversations about Identity Preservation: Implications for Cooperatives," 2003 Annual Meeting, October 29 31803, NCERA-194 Research on Cooperatives.
    2. Lipton, Kathryn L., 1998. "The Food and Fiber System: Contributing to the U.S. and World Economies," Agricultural Information Bulletins 33761, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    3. Siros Tongchure, 2013. "Cassava Smallholders’ Participation in Contract Farming in Nakhon Ratchasrima Province, Thailand," Journal of Social and Development Sciences, AMH International, vol. 4(7), pages 332-338.
    4. Charles R. Knoeber, 2000. "Les contrats de production dans l'agriculture américaine. Une caractérisation de la recherche empirique actuelle," Économie rurale, Programme National Persée, vol. 259(1), pages 3-15.
    5. Erkan Rehber, 2000. "Vertical Coordination In The Agro-Food Industry And Contract Farming: A Comparative Study Of Turkey And The Usa," Food Marketing Policy Center Research Reports 052, University of Connecticut, Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Charles J. Zwick Center for Food and Resource Policy.
    6. Sazzad Parwez, 2016. "A Conceptual Model for Integration of Indian Food Supply Chains," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 17(4), pages 834-850, August.
    7. Strzebicki, Dariusz, 2013. "Economic Considerations Of Entering Into Agricultural Procurement Contracts For Agricultural Goods," Economic and Regional Studies (Studia Ekonomiczne i Regionalne), John Paul II University of Applied Sciences in Biala Podlaska, vol. 6(4).
    8. Sara Rodríguez & Lluis Plà & Javier Faulin, 2014. "New opportunities in operations research to improve pork supply chain efficiency," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 219(1), pages 5-23, August.
    9. E. Veselská, 2005. "The process of vertical coordination and its consequences within the beer commodity chain," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 51(9), pages 419-426.
    10. Sporleder Thomas L. & Boland Michael A., 2013. "Seven fundamental economic characteristics exclusivity of agrifood supply chains (part 1)," Экономика региона, CyberLeninka;Федеральное государственное бюджетное учреждение науки «Институт экономики Уральского отделения Российской академии наук», issue 3 (35), pages 238-246.
    11. Sporleder, Thomas L. & Boland, Michael A., 2011. "Exclusivity of Agrifood Supply Chains: Seven Fundamental Economic Characteristics," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 14(5), pages 1-15, December.
    12. Martinez, Steve & Zering, Kelly, 1997. "Vertical Coordination and Consumer Welfare: The Case of the Pork Industry," Agricultural Economic Reports 262048, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    13. Hendrikse, G.W.J. & Bijman, W.J.J., 2000. "Ownership Structure in Agrifood Chains," ERIM Report Series Research in Management ERS-2000-15-ORG, Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM), ERIM is the joint research institute of the Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University and the Erasmus School of Economics (ESE) at Erasmus University Rotterdam.
    14. C. Hinrichs & Rick Welsh, 2003. "The effects of the industrialization of US livestock agriculture on promoting sustainable production practices," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 20(2), pages 125-141, June.
    15. Martinez, Stephen W., 2002. "Vertical Coordination Of Marketing Systems: Lessons From The Poultry, Egg, And Pork Industries," Agricultural Economic Reports 34051, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    16. Davies, Terry & Konisky, David M., 2000. "Environmental Implications of the Foodservice and Food Retail Industries," Discussion Papers 10761, Resources for the Future.
    17. Liang, Qiao & Hendrikse, George W. J. & Huang, Zuhui, 2010. "Value added and governance structure: Evidence from the pear industry in China's Zhejiang province," IAMO Forum 2010: Institutions in Transition – Challenges for New Modes of Governance 52708, Leibniz Institute of Agricultural Development in Central and Eastern Europe (IAMO).
    18. Clare A. Narrod & Keith O. Fuglie, 2000. "Private investment in livestock breeding with implications for public research policy," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 16(4), pages 457-470.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:uersfr:266246. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ersgvus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.