IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/thkase/356816.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Cost of Traffic Congestion and Marginal Cost of Delay in Bangkok Metropolis

Author

Listed:
  • Beerkaew, Areerak
  • Jarungrattanapong, Rawadee
  • Nabangchang, Orapan
  • Tambunlertchai, Kanittha

Abstract

Traffic congestion in Bangkok, particularly during rush hours, imposes significant private and external economic costs on society, a problem exacerbated by the rapid increase in the number of private vehicles in the city. To the best of our knowledge, no study has estimated the cost of traffic congestion in Thailand using a survey research design. This study aims to estimate both the cost and the marginal cost of heavy traffic during rush hours, utilizing data gathered from 215 commuters in Bangkok and nearby suburbs. The findings indicate that the annual traffic congestion costs per vehicle range between THB 77,021 and THB 76,155 (USD 2,567 and USD 2,538) at 2023 price levels, depending on the greenhouse gas (GHG) damage cost discount rates used. Additionally, the marginal cost of delay per vehicle due to heavy traffic is approximately THB 646 (USD 22) at 2023 price levels. This value can serve as a proxy for the benefit (or avoided cost) that commuters could gain if the government were to implement traffic congestion mitigation measures, such as congestion charges. While imposing fees could be one potential solution to address the traffic problem in Bangkok, further research is needed to determine the appropriate amount of charges, considering factors like the price elasticity of demand for congestion charges and their acceptability to the public.

Suggested Citation

  • Beerkaew, Areerak & Jarungrattanapong, Rawadee & Nabangchang, Orapan & Tambunlertchai, Kanittha, 2024. "The Cost of Traffic Congestion and Marginal Cost of Delay in Bangkok Metropolis," Asian Journal of Applied Economics, Kasetsart University, Center for Applied Economics Research, vol. 31(2), December.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:thkase:356816
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.356816
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/356816/files/The%20Cost%20of%20Traffic%20Congestion%20and%20Marginal%20Cost%20of%20Delay.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.356816?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kolstad, Charles, 2011. "Intermediate Environmental Economics: International Edition," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, edition 2, number 9780199732654, Decembrie.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Fatima Khalid & Asma Jamil & Huda Kamal & Tahira Afzal & Tahseenullah Khan & Muhammad Babar Taj & Ahmad Raheel & Syed Ahmad Tirmizi & Muhammad Babar Taj & Muhammad Jamshed Iqbal & Muhammad Ashiq & Muh, 2019. "Multiple Impacts of Illegal Logging- A key to Deforestation Over the Globe," Biomedical Journal of Scientific & Technical Research, Biomedical Research Network+, LLC, vol. 20(5), pages 15430-15435, August.
    2. Botor, Benjamin & Böcker, Benjamin & Kallabis, Thomas & Weber, Christoph, 2021. "Information shocks and profitability risks for power plant investments – impacts of policy instruments," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    3. Tatyana Deryugina & Frances C. Moore & Richard S.J. Tol, 2020. "Applications of the Coase Theorem," Working Paper Series 0820, Department of Economics, University of Sussex Business School.
    4. Colombo, Luca & Labrecciosa, Paola & Van Long, Ngo, 2022. "A dynamic analysis of international environmental agreements under partial cooperation," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 143(C).
    5. Filippo Maria D’Arcangelo & Ilai Levin & Alessia Pagani & Mauro Pisu & Åsa Johansson, 2022. "A framework to decarbonise the economy," OECD Economic Policy Papers 31, OECD Publishing.
    6. Kualwik, Jacek, 2016. "Selected problems of farmland valuation and setting rents for its lease," Problems of Agricultural Economics / Zagadnienia Ekonomiki Rolnej 252639, Institute of Agricultural and Food Economics - National Research Institute (IAFE-NRI).
    7. Sahar Milani, 2023. "Teaching Environmental Macroeconomics to Undergraduate Students," Eastern Economic Journal, Palgrave Macmillan;Eastern Economic Association, vol. 49(3), pages 391-407, June.
    8. Dahal, Ram P. & Grala, Robert K. & Gordon, Jason S. & Petrolia, Daniel R. & Munn, Ian A., 2018. "Estimating the willingness to pay to preserve waterfront open spaces using contingent valuation," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 614-626.
    9. Li, Xing & Hu, Zhigao & Cao, Jianhua & Xu, Xing, 2022. "The impact of environmental accountability on air pollution: A public attention perspective," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    10. Oestreich, Andreas Marcel, 2017. "On optimal audit mechanisms for environmental taxes," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 62-83.
    11. Arik Levinson, 2025. "Tariffs are an obstacle to the clean energy transition," Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 44(1), pages 329-331, January.
    12. Hwang, In Chang & Son, Wonik, 2019. "The benefit of management policy of Seoul on airborne particulate matter: An application of contingent valuation," MPRA Paper 93613, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    13. Davis, Andrew, 2017. "Failures in adopting green technology under perfect pollution pricing and monopoly," International Review of Economics Education, Elsevier, vol. 26(C), pages 9-13.
    14. Daniel Kühnhenrich, 2024. "The German Environmental Tax Reform: a difference-in-differences analysis of its impacts in European comparison," Environmental Economics and Policy Studies, Springer;Society for Environmental Economics and Policy Studies - SEEPS, vol. 26(1), pages 71-99, January.
    15. Hsiao‐Chi Chen & Yunshyong Chow & Shi‐Miin Liu, 2022. "International environmental agreements under an evolutionary mechanism of imitation and asymmetric countries," International Journal of Economic Theory, The International Society for Economic Theory, vol. 18(3), pages 285-309, September.
    16. Xiaoping Zhou & Lan Yang & Xiaokun Gu & Lufa Zhang & Li Li, 2022. "Scarcity Value Assessment of Ecosystem Services Based on Changes in Supply and Demand: A Case Study of the Yangtze River Delta City Cluster, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(19), pages 1-20, September.
    17. Richard S. J. Tol, 2023. "Navigating the energy trilemma during geopolitical and environmental crises," Papers 2301.07671, arXiv.org.
    18. Jane Turpie & Gwyneth Letley & Robynne Chyrstal & Stefan Corbella & Derek Stretch, 2017. "A Spatial Valuation of the Natural and Semi-Natural Open Space Areas in eThekwini Municipality," World Bank Publications - Reports 26765, The World Bank Group.
    19. R. J. Farquharson & J. W. Freebairn & J. A. Webb & M. J. Stewardson & T. Ramilan, 2017. "An Economic Framework for Sharing Water Within a River Catchment," Water Economics and Policy (WEP), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 3(03), pages 1-19, July.
    20. Bouwe R. Dijkstra, 2022. "Payments from Households to Distant Polluting Firms," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 82(3), pages 681-715, July.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Agribusiness; Agricultural Finance;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:thkase:356816. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/darkuth.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.